Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T03:53:46.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A spectral order for infinite-dimensional quantum spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2012

JOE MASHBURN
JOE MASHBURN*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Dayton, Dayton OH 45469-2316, U.S.A. Email: joe.mashburn@udayton.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper we extend the spectral order of Coecke and Martin to infinite-dimensional quantum states. Many properties present in the finite-dimensional case are preserved, but some of the most important are lost. The order is constructed and its properties analysed. Most of the useful measurements of information content are lost. Shannon entropy is defined on only a part of the model, and that part is not a closed subset of the model. The finite parts of the lattices used by Birkhoff and von Neumann as models for classical and quantum logic appear as subsets of the models for infinite classical and quantum states.

Information

Type
Paper
Information
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 95 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

References

Abramsky, S. and Jung, A. (1994) Domain Theory. In: Abramsky, S., Gabbay, D. M. and Maibaum, T. S. E. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, Volume III, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birkhoff, G. and von Neumann, J. (1936) The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics 37 823–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brukner, C. and Zeilinger, A. (1999) Operationally Invariant Information in Quantum Measurements. Physical Review Letters 83 (17)3354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brukner, C. and Zeilinger, A. (2001) Conceptual inadequacy of the Shannon information in quantum measurements. Physical Review A 63 022113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bub, J. (2005) Quantum theory is about quantum information. Foundations of Physics 35 (4)541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, R., Bub, J. and Halvorson, H. (2003) Characterizing Quantum Theory in terms of Information-Theoretic Constraints. Foundations of Physics 33 1561–1591. (Available at arXive:quant-ph/0211089.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coecke, B. and Martin, K. (2002) A partial order on classical and quantum states. Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Research Report PRG-RR-02-07. (Available at http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/publications/tr/rr-02-07.html.)Google Scholar
Coecke, B. and Martin, K. (2004) Partiality in Physics. Invited paper in: Quantum theory: reconsideration of the foundations 2, Vaxjo, Sweden, Vaxjo University Press.Google Scholar
van Enk, S. J. (2007) A Toy Model for Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics 37 1447–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fano, G. (1971) Mathematical Methods of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. (2002) Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more). (Available at arXive:quant-ph/0205039.)Google Scholar
Hagar, A. and Hemmo, M. (2006) Explaining the Unobserved – Why Quantum Mechanics Ain't Only About Information. Foundations of Physics 36 (9)1295–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E. and Pólya, G. (1952) Inequalities, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. W. and Olkin, I. (1979) Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. Mathematics in Science and Engineering 143, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Martin, K. (2000) A Foundation for Computing, Ph.D. Thesis, Tulane University. (Available at http://www.math.tulane.edu/~martin/).)Google Scholar
Martin, K. (2004) A continuous domain of classical states. Research Report RR-04-06, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Programming Research Group. (Available at http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/techreports/oucl/rr-04-06.html.)Google Scholar
Mashburn, J. (2008) A comparison of three topologies on ordered sets. Topology Proceedings 31 (1)197–217.Google Scholar
Mashburn, J. (2008) An Order Model for Infinite Classical States. Foundations of Physics 38 (1)47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, M. A. (1999) Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations. Physical Review Letters 83 (2)436–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. (1970) Outline of a mathematical theory of computation, Technical Monograph PRG-2.Google Scholar
Spekkens, R. (2007) In the defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory. Physical Reviews A 75 032110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timpson, C. G. (2003) On a supposed conceptual inadequacy of the Shannon information in quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (4)441–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uffink, J. B. M. (1990) Measures of Uncertainty and the Uncertainty Principle, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utrecht. (Available at http://www.phys.uu.nl/igg/jos/publications/proefschrift.pdf.)Google Scholar