No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Verification of tree-processing programs via higher-order mode checking†
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2014
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
We propose a new method to verify that a higher-order, tree-processing functional program conforms to an input/output specification. Our method reduces the verification problem to multiple verification problems for higher-order multi-tree transducers, which are then transformed into higher-order recursion schemes and model-checked. Unlike previous methods, our new method can deal with arbitrary higher-order functional programs manipulating algebraic data structures, as long as certain invariants on intermediate data structures are provided by a programmer. We have proved the soundness of the method and implemented a prototype verifier.
Information
- Type
- Paper
- Information
- Mathematical Structures in Computer Science , Volume 25 , Issue 4: APLAS 2010 , May 2015 , pp. 841 - 866
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
Footnotes
†
Revised and extended version of (Unno et al. 2010).
References
Aehlig, K., de Miranda, J. G. and Luke Ong, C.-H.. (2005) The monadic second order theory of trees given by arbitrary level-two recursion schemes is decidable. In:TLCA'05, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3461 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzaken, V., Castagna, G. and Frisch, A. (2003) CDuce: An XML-centric general-purpose language. In: ICFP '03, ACM 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, A. S., Møller, A. and Schwartzbach, M. I. (2003) Precise analysis of string expressions. In: SAS'03, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2694 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. (2005) Practical Refinement-Type Checking, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Chair-Pfenning, Frank.Google Scholar
Engelfriet, J. and Vogler, H. (1985) Macro tree transducers. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 31 (1)71–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelfriet, J. and Vogler, H. (1988) High level tree transducers and iterated pushdown tree transducers. Acta Informatica 26 (1/2)131–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, T. and Pfenning, F. (1991) Refinement types for ML. In: PLDI '91, ACM 268–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosoya, H. and Pierce, B. C. (2003) XDuce: A statically typed XML processing language. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 3 (2)117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosoya, H., Vouillon, J. and Pierce, B. C. (2000) Regular expression types for XML. In: ICFP '00, ACM 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosoya, H., Frisch, A. and Castagna, G. (2009) Parametric polymorphism for XML. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 32 (1)1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N. D. and Andersen, N. (2007) Flow analysis of lazy higher-order functional programs. Theoretical Computer Science 375 (1–3)120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapik, T., Niwinski, D. and Urzyczyn, P. (2002) Higher-order pushdown trees are easy. In: FoSSaCS'02, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2303 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, N. and Ong, C.-H. L. (2009) A type system equivalent to the modal mu-calculus model checking of higher-order recursion schemes. In: LICS '09, IEEE 179–188.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, N., Tabuchi, N. and Unno, H. (2010) Higher-order multi-parameter tree transducers and recursion schemes for program verification. In: POPL '10, ACM 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, N. (2009a) Types and higher-order recursion schemes for verification of higher-order programs. In: POPL '09, ACM 416–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, N. (2009b) Model-checking higher-order functions. In: PPDP '09, ACM 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochems, J. and Ong, C.-H. L. (2011) Improved functional flow and reachability analyses using indexed linear tree grammars. In: RTA2011.Google Scholar
Maneth, S., Berlea, A., Perst, T. and Seidl, H. (2005) XML type checking with macro tree transducers. In: PODS '05, ACM 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milo, T., Suciu, D. and Vianu, V. (2003) Typechecking for XML transformers. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 66 (1)66–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minamide, Y. (2005) Static approximation of dynamically generated web pages. In: WWW '05, ACM 432–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, C.-H. L. and Ramsay, S. J. (2011) Verifying higher-order functional programs with pattern-matching algebraic data types. In: POPL '11, ACM 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, C.-H. L. (2006) On model-checking trees generated by higher-order recursion schemes. In: LICS '06, IEEE 81–90.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A., Waas, F., Kersten, M., Carey, M. J., Manolescu, I. and Busse, R. (2002) XMark: A benchmark for XML data management. In: VLDB '02, VLDB Endowment 974–985.Google Scholar
Tabuchi, N., Kobayashi, N. and Unno, H. (2011) Inference of tree data structure invariant based on language identification from samples. (Available at http://www.kb.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~uhiro/.)Google Scholar
Tozawa, A. (2006) XML type checking using high-level tree transducer. In: FLOPS'06, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3945 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unno, H., Tabuchi, N. and Kobayashi, N. (2010) Verification of tree-processing programs via higher-order model checking. In: APLAS'10, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6461 312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access