Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:00:51.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finite-time break-up can occur in any unsteady interacting boundary layer

Part of:Incompressible viscous fluids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

F. T. Smith
F. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT
Get access

Summary

This theoretical work shows formally that unsteady interactive boundary layers can break up within a finite time by encountering a nonlinear localized singularity. The theory is an extension of, and is guided to a large extent by, Brotherton-Ratcliffe and Smith's (1987) work on a special case. Two major types of singularity are proposed, a “moderate” type yielding a singular pressure gradient and a “severe” type associated with a pressure discontinuity. Each type produces a singular response in the skin friction in the case of wall-bounded flows. The present finite-time singularity applies to any unsteady interactive flow, e.g., incompressible or compressible boundary layers, internal flows, wakes, in two or three dimensions; and the singularity and its associated change in flow structure have numerous repercussions, which are discussed, physically and theoretically, concerning boundary-layer transition in particular.

MSC classification

Secondary:76D10: Boundary-layer theory, separation and reattachment, higher-order effects

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematika , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , December 1988, pp. 256 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brotherton-Ratcliffe, R. V. and Smith, F. T.. Mathematika, 34 (1987), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovgal, A. V., Kozlov, V. V. and Simonov, O. A.. Boundary Layer Separation, eds. Smith, F. T. and Brown, S. N. (Springer, 1987).Google Scholar
Duck, P. W.. J. Fluid Mech., 160 (1985), 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasel, H.. Turbulence and Chaotic Phen. in Fluids ed. Tatsumi, T. (Elsevier Sci. Pub. B.V., 1984).Google Scholar
Fasel, H.. Trans. A.S.M.E., meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio (1987), June. [See also K. Gruber, H. Bestek and H. Fasel. A.I.A.A. paper no. 87–1256].Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Smith, F. T.. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 417 (1988), 255–282. Also other papers in preparation, based on ICASE Repts. 88–45, 88–46.Google Scholar
Henkes, R. A. W. M. and Veldman, A. E. P.. Boundary-Layer Separation, eds. Smith, F. T. and Brown, S. N. (Springer, 1987); see also J. Fluid Mech., 179 (1987), 513–529.Google Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S., Tidstrom, K. D. and Sargent, L. M.. J. Fluid Mech., 12 (1962), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBalleur, J.-C. and Girodroux-Lavigne, P.. Boundary Layer Separation, eds. Smith, F. T. and Brown, S. N. (Springer, 1987).Google Scholar
Peridier, V. J., Smith, F. T. and Walker, J. D. A.. A.I.A.A. paper (1988) no. 88–0604, presented January 1988, Reno, Nevada.Google Scholar
Ryzhov, O. S.. Private communications (1987).Google Scholar
Smith, F. T., Papageorgiou, D. T. and Elliott, J. W.. J. Fluid Mech., 146 (1984), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. T.. A.I.A.A. paper (1984) no. 84–1582, presented June 1984, Snowmass, Colorado.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T.. Utd. Tech. Res. Cent., E. Hartford, Conn., U.S.A., Rept. (1985) UT 85–36; see also J. Fluid Mech., 169 (1986), 353–377.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T.. UTRC Rept., 87–52 and “On the first-mode instability in subsonic, supersonic and hypersonic boundary layers”, J. Fluid Mech., in the press (1988a).Google Scholar
Smith, F. T.. UTRC Rept. 88–12 and Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 420 (1988b), 21–52.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T.. Computers and Fluids (1988c). To appear. “Steady and unsteady 3D interacting boundary layers”, based on a presentation at the R. T. Davis Memorial Symposium, Cincinnati, Ohio, June, 1987.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. and Bodonyi, R. J.. Aeron. J., 89 (1985), 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. T. and Bodonyi, R. J.. Stud, in Appl. Math., 77 (1987), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. T. and Burggraf, O. R.. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 399 (1985), 25–55.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. and Doorly, D. J.. J. Fluid Mech. (1989). To appear. “On displacement-thickness, wall-layer and mid-flow slugs of vorticity in channel and pipe flows”.Google Scholar
Tutty, O. R. and Cowley, S. J.. J. Fluid Mech., 168 (1986), 431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. D. A., Smith, C. R., Cerra, A. W. and Doligalski, T. L.. J. Fluid Mech., 179 (1987), 513–529.Google Scholar