Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T23:25:00.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multicomponent gas flow through compacted clay buffer in a higher activity radioactive waste geological disposal facility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

S. A. Masum,
P. J. Vardon,
H. R. Thomas,
Q. Chen and
D. Nicholson
S. A. Masum*
Affiliation:
Geoenvironmental Research Centre, Cardiff School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Queen's Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK
P. J. Vardon
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Geo-Engineering Section, PO Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
H. R. Thomas
Affiliation:
Geoenvironmental Research Centre, Cardiff School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Queen's Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK
Q. Chen
Affiliation:
Arup, 13 Fitzroy Street, London W1T 4BQ, UK
D. Nicholson
Affiliation:
Arup, 13 Fitzroy Street, London W1T 4BQ, UK
*
*E-mail: masumsa1@cardiff.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

At the post-closure stage of a geological disposal facility for higher activity radioactive waste several species of gas are likely to be generated in the near-field environment. These could alter the sealing and chemical properties of the bentonite buffer and the local geochemical environment significantly. The authors' attempt to simulate multicomponent gas flow through variably saturated porous media is presented. Governing equations have been developed for a reactive gas-flow model to simulate the thermo-hydro-gas-chemical-mechanical behaviour, with specific reference to the performance of highly compacted bentonite buffer subjected to repository gas generation and migration. The developed equations have been included in the bespoke numerical model COMPASS and some generic simulations are also presented. The model presented extends current capability to assess buffer performance.

Keywords

transportradioactive wasteTHCMbentonitebuffer

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 76 , Issue 8 , December 2012, pp. 3337 - 3344
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
© [2012] The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2012

References

Bonin, B., Colin, M. and Dutfoy, A. (2000) Pressure building during the early stages of gas production in a radioactive waste repository. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 281, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cussler, E.L. (1984) Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Harrington, J.F. and Horseman, S.T. (2003) Gas Migration in KBS-3 Buffer Bentonite. SKB Technical Report 03–02. SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Horseman, S.T. and Harrington, J.F. (1997) Study of Gas Migration in Mx80 Buffer Bentonite. British Geological Survey Technical Report WE/97/7. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, UK.Google Scholar
Mason, E.A. and Malinauskas, A.P. (1964) Gaseous diffusion in porous media. IV. Thermal diffusion. Journal of Chemical Physics, 41, 3815–3819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuclear Energy Agency (2001) Gas Generation and Migration in Radioactive Waste Disposal: Safetyrelevant Issues. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 192 pp.Google Scholar
Ortiz, L., Volckaert, G. and Mallants, D. (2002) Gas generation and migration in Boom Clay, a potential host rock formation for nuclear waste storage. Engineering Geology, 64, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhurst, D.L. and Appelo, C.A.J. (1999) User’s Guide to PHREEQC (version 2). US Geological Survey, Water Resource Investigation Report 99–4259.Google Scholar
Pusch, R. and Forsberg, T. (1983) Gas Migration Through Bentonite Clay. SKB Technical Report TR-83–71.SKB, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Rodwell, W.R., Harris, A.W., Horseman, S.T., Lalieux, P., Müller, W., Ortiz, L. and Pruess, K. (1999) Gas Migration Through Engineered and Geological Barriers for a Deep Repository for Radioactive Waste: Status Report. European Commission Report EUR 19122EN.Google Scholar
Seetharam, S.C., Thomas, H.R. and Cleall, P.J. (2007) Coupled thermo/hydro/chemical/mechanical model for unsaturated soils - numerical algorithm. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 70, 1480–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senger, R., Marschall, P. and Finsterle, S. (2008) Investigation of two phase flow phenomena associated with corrosion in an SF/HLW repository in Opalinus Clay, Switzerland. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, 317–326.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. and Krishna, R. (1993) Multicomponent Mass Transfer. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Thomas, H.R. and He, Y. (1998) Modelling the behaviour of unsaturated soil using an elasto plastic constitutive relationship. Géotechnique, 48, 589–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar