Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T17:20:41.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The structural relation between svetlozarite and dachiardite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

L. R. Gellens,
G. D. Price and
J. V. Smith
L. R. Gellens
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA 60637
G. D. Price
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA 60637
J. V. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA 60637
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Svetlozarite, previously described as a new member of the mordenite group of zeolites, is reinterpreted as a multiply twinned and highly faulted dachiardite. X-ray diffraction study and transmission electron microscopy revealed (001) twins and (100) stacking faults. The former are attributed at least mainly to the insertion of a b glide plane between dachiardite sheets at each twin interface, which preserves the 5-ring linkages between the sheets. The latter are associated with loss of the C face-centring relation, and are attributed to replacement of shared 5-rings by linked 4-rings in the dachiardite sheets. Further study is needed to determine whether the structural faults in the dachiardite structures are chemically controlled.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 45 , Issue 337 , 1982, pp. 157 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Present address: Centrum voor Oppervlaktescheikunde en Colloidale Scheikunde, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium.

References

Alberti, A. (1975) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 49, 63-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonardi, M. (1979) Mineral. Mag. 43, 548-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli, E. (1965) Period. Mineral. 34, 129-35.Google Scholar
Gottardi, G. (1960) Ibid. 29, 183-4.Google Scholar
Gottardi, G. and Meier, W. M. (1963) Z. Kristallogr. 119, 53-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, I. S. (1963) Nature, 197, 1194-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maleyev, M. N. (1977) Int. Geol. Rev. 19, 993-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlino, S. (1975) Soc. ltal. Mineral. Petrol. Rend. 31, 513-40.Google Scholar
Merlino, S. (1976) Izvj. Jugoslav. Centr. Krist. (Zagreb), 11, 19-37.Google Scholar
Sherman, J. D., and Bennett, J. M. (1973) In Molecular Sieves (Meier, W. M., and Uytterhoeven, J. B. eds.), Advances in Chemistry Series, 121, 52-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. V. (1974) Feldspar Minerals, Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wise, W. S., and Tschernieh, R. S. (1976) In Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties and Use (Sand, L. B., and Mumpton, F. A. eds.), Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 105-11.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, T., and Wakabayashi, S. (1977) Sci. Rept. Niigata Univ., ser. E, 4, 49-65.Google Scholar