Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:46:34.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tavistockite and bialite discredited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

P. G. Embrey and
E. E. Fejer
P. G. Embrey
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History)
E. E. Fejer
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History)
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Specimens of tavistockite fall into two groups: true tavistockite from the George and Charlotte mine, Tavistock, Devon, and wavellite from the Stenna Gwyn mine, St. Austell, Cornwall. Both were sold as tavistockite by the discoverer, Richard Talling.

Tavistockite proper is a fluorapatite, as shown by optical and X-ray examination, and the alumina and water in the original analysis are certainly derived from kaolinite with which the apatite is intimately associated.

The published optical properties attributed to tavistockite were determined by E. S. Larsen on Stenna Gwyn material, and are those of wavellite.

Re-examination of a portion of Buttgenbach's type bialite, which he related to tavistockite on optical grounds, shows it to be wavellite.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 37 , Issue 285 , March 1969, pp. 123 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable