Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:02:39.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nilgiri Tribal Systems: A View From Below

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Nurit Bird-David
Nurit Bird-David
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1980, the Nilgiris of Tamil Nadu were chosen to be India's first biosphere reserve under the Man and the Environment program launched by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) in an attempt to conserve for study examples of characteristic eco-systems from each of the world's natural regions. Scholastic interest from a broad spectrum of disciplines has turned, therefore, to the Nilgiris, and it has become apparent that although the Nilgiris have been studied extensively, anthropological attention has been uneven and parts of the region have been grossly understudied. The present paper intends to provide a foundation for filling this gap in the Nilgiri scholarship.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , May 1994, pp. 339 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Appadurai, A. (ed.). 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, N. (subsequently Bird-David). 1983a. ‘Conjugal Families and Single Persons: An Analysis of the Naiken Social System’, Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
Bird, N. 1983b. ‘Wage-gathering: Socio-economic change and the case of the Naiken of South India’. In Rural South Asia: Linkages, Change and Development, ed. Robb, P.. London: Curzon Press, pp. 57–89.Google Scholar
Bird-David, N. 1987a. ‘The Kurumbas of the Nilgiris: An ethnographic myth?’ In Modern Asian Studies 21, 1, pp. 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird-David, N. 1987b. ‘Single persons and social cohesion in a hunter-gatherer society’. In Dimensions of Social Life: Essays in Honour of David Mandelbaum, ed. Hockings, P.. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bird-David, N. 1988. ‘Hunter-gatherers and other people: A re-examination’. In Hunters and Gatherers I: History, Evolution and Social Change, ed. Ingold, T., Riches, D., and Woodburn, J.. Berg: Oxford.Google Scholar
Bird-David, N. 1989. ‘The people and the ethnographic myth: An introduction to the study of the Nayaka’. In Blue Mountains: The Ethnography and Biogeography of a South Indian Region, ed. Hockings, P.. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–28.Google Scholar
Bird-David, N. 1990. ‘The giving environment: Another perspective on the economic system of gatherer-hunters’. In Current Anthropology 31(2), 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird-David, N. 1992a. ‘Beyond “The Original Affluent Society”: a culturalist reformulation’. In Current Anthropology (03).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird-David, N. 1992b. ‘Beyond the “hunting and gathering mode of subsistence”: culture-sensitive observations on the Nayaka and other modern hunter-gatherers’ in Man vol. 27:1, pp. 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeks, J. W. 1875. An Account of the Primitive Tribes and Monuments of the Niagiris. London: India Museum.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1941. ‘Language and social forms: A study of Toda kinship terms and dual descent’. In Language, Culture and Personality: Essays in Memory of Edward Sapir. Menasha: Sapir Memorial Publication Fund, 158–79.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1946. Kola Texts. University of California Publications in Linguistics 11: 191–335.Google Scholar
Fox, R. G. 1963. ‘Caste dominance and coercion in the Nilgiris’. In Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters 48, 493–512.Google Scholar
Francis, W. 1908. The Nilgiris (Madras District Gazetteers), Superintendent, Government Press.Google Scholar
Furer-Haimendorf Von, C. 1950. ‘Youth-dormitories and community houses in India. A restatement and a review’. In Anthropos 45, 119–44.Google Scholar
Furer-Haimendorf Von, C. 1952. ‘Ethnographic notes on some communities of the Wynaad’. In Eastern Anthropologist VI, 18–32.Google Scholar
Gould, H. A. 1967. ‘Priest and counterpriest: A structural analysis of Jajmani relationships in the Hindu Plains and the Nilgiri Hills’. In Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.) 1, 25–55.Google Scholar
Grigg, H. B. 1880. A Manual of the Nilgiri District in the Madras Presidency. Madras: E. Keys Government Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, H. 1832. A Description of a Singular Aboriginal Race Inhabiting the Summit of the Neilgherry Hills, or Blue Mountains of Coimbatore in the Southern Peninsula of India. London: Smith, Elder and Co.Google Scholar
Hockings, P. 1965. ‘Cultural Change among the Badaga, a community of Southern India’. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hockings, P. 1978. A Bibliography for the Nilgiri Hills of Southern India. Human Relations Area Files, New Haven, Connecticut, vols I–II.Google Scholar
Hockings, P. 1980. Ancient Hindu Refugees: Badaga Social History 1550–1975. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockings, P. (ed.). 1989. Blue Mountains: The Ethnography and Biogeography of a South Indian Region. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kapp, D. B. 1978. ‘Childbirth and name-giving among the Alu Kurumbas of South India’. In Aspects of Tribal Life in South Asia I: Strategy and Survival, ed. Moser, R. R. and Gautam, M. K.. Berne: Studia Ethnologica Bernesia 1, 167–80.Google Scholar
Kapp, D. B. and Hockings, P.. 1989. ‘The Kurumba Tribes’. In Blue Mountains: The Ethnography and Biogeography of a South Indian Region, ed. Hockings, P.. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 232–47.Google Scholar
Keys, W. 1812. A topographical description of the Neelaghery Mountains from a letter by William Keys, Assistant Revenue Surveyor to W. Garrows, Collector of Coimbatore in Grigg 1880 xlviii–li.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, D. G. 1938. ‘Polyandry in Kota society’. In American Anthropologist 40: 574–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, D. G. 1941. ‘Culture change among the Nilgiri tribes’. In American Anthropologist 43: 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, P. R. G. 1977e. Tribal Situation in Kerala. Trivandrum: Kerala Historical Society.Google Scholar
Metz, J. F. 1864. The Tribes Inhabiting the Neilgherry Hills: Their Social Customs and Religions Rites, 2nd edition. Mangalore: Basel Mission Press.Google Scholar
Misra, R. 1971. Mullu-Kurumbas of Kappala. Calcutta: Anth. Survey of India.Google Scholar
Misra, R. 1972. Inter-tribal relations in Erumad. In Eastern Anthropologist 25: 135–48.Google Scholar
Misra, R. 1989. ‘The Mulla Kurumbas’. In Blue Mountains: The Ethnography and Biogeography of a South Indian Region, ed. Hockings, P.. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 304–18.Google Scholar
Namibiar, P. K. and Baharathi, T. B. 1965. Census of India 1961, vol. IX, Madras, Part VI, Village Survey Monograph 20 Hallimoyar Delhi: Manager of Publications, Govt. of India.Google Scholar
Noble, W. A. 1976. Nilgiri Dolmens. In Anthropos 71: 90–128.Google Scholar
Ouchterlony, J. 1848. Geographical and statistical memoir of a survey of the Neilgherry Mountains, under the superintendence of CaptainGoogle Scholar
Ouchterlony, J., 1847. In Madras Journal of Literature and Science XV, 1–138 [1849].Google Scholar
Raghavan, M. D. 1929. ‘Jain-Kurumbers: An account of their life and habits.’ In Man in India, vol. IX: 54–65.Google Scholar
Richards, F. J. 1932. ‘Notes on the cultural geography of the Wynaad’. In Indian Antiquary 61: 170–4, 195–7.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. 1906. The Todas. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rooksby, R. L. 1959 ‘The Kurumbas of Malabar’. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, London.Google Scholar
Stokes, W. 1882. ‘Mission work amongst the Badagas and other hill tribes on the Nilgiris’. In Harvest Field III: 169–70.Google Scholar
Thurston, E. 1909. Castes and Tribes of Southern India, 7 vols. Madras: Government Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, E. 1912. Omens and Superstitions of Southern India. London, Leipzig: T. Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Tignous, H. P. J. A. 1911. ‘In the Nilgherries’. In Illustrated Catholic Missions XXVI: 99–102, 116–19, 154–7.Google Scholar
Vergese, I. 1969. ‘The Kota’, Bulletin of the Anthropological Survey of India 18(2): 107–82.Google Scholar
Walker, A. R. 1986. The Toda of South India: A New Look. Delhi: Hindustan.Google Scholar
Ward, B. S. 1821. ‘Geographical and statistical memoir of a survey of the Neelgherry Mountains in the Province of Coimbatore made in 1821 under the superintendence of Captain B. S. Ward, Deputy Surveyor-General’. In Grigg 1880, lx–lxxviii.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. 1812. Military Reminiscences.Google Scholar
Woodburn, J. 1980. ‘Hunters and gatherers today and reconstruction of the past’. In Soviet and Western Anthropology, ed. Gellner, E.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, K. V. 1979. The Irula (Erla) Language. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Neuindische Studien 6.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, K. V. 1981. ‘Problems of identification and classification of some Nilagiri tribes: Irula-Uralis, Kattu Nayaka/Jenu Kurumba, Solegas’. In Anthropos 76: 467–528.Google Scholar