Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:09:52.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fuels for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

D. Petti,
D. Crawford and
N. Chauvin
Get access

Abstract

Fuels for advanced nuclear reactors differ from conventional light water reactor fuels and also vary widely because of the specific architectures and intended missions of the reactor systems proposed to deploy them. Functional requirements of all fuel designs for advanced nuclear energy systems include (1) retention of fission products and fuel nuclides, (2) dimensional stability, and (3) maintenance of a geometry that can be cooled. In all cases, anticipated fuel performance is the limiting factor in reactor system design, and cumulative effects of increased utilization and increased exposure to inservice environments degrade fuel performance. In this article, the current status of each fuel system is reviewed, and technical challenges confronting the implementation of each fuel in the context of the entire advanced reactor fuel cycle (fabrication, reactor performance, recycle) are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 34 , Issue 1: Materials Challenges for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems , January 2009, pp. 40 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Konomura, M., Ichimiya, M., J. Nucl. Mater. 371, 250 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Spencer, B.W., Hill, R.N., Wade, D.C., Hill, D.J., Sienicki, J.J., Khalil, H.S., Cahalan, J.E., Farmer, M.T., Maroni, V.A., Leibowitz, L., “An Advanced Modular HLMC Reactor Concept Featuring Economy, Safety and Proliferation Resistance,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE'00) (ASME, New York, 2000), p. 8145.Google Scholar
3 Allen, T.R., Crawford, D.C., Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations 2007, 97486 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Crawford, D.C., Meyer, M.K., Hayes, S.L., Laidler, J.J., “Requirements and Long-Term Development Plan for Fast-Spectrum Transmutation Fuels in the U.S.,” in Proceedings of the Seventh Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, (OECD-NEA, Jeju, Korea, 14–16 October 2002), p. 465.Google Scholar
5 Verfondern, K., Nabielek, H., Kendall, J.M., Nucl. Eng. Technol. 39 (5), 603 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 “Fuel Performance and Fission Product Behaviour in Gas Cooled Reactors” (IAEA-TEC-DOC-978, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, November 1997).Google Scholar
7 Gontard, R., Nabielek, H., “Performance Evaluation of Modern HTR TRISO Fuels” (Tech. Rep. HTA-IB-05/90, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany, 1990).Google Scholar
8 Petti, D.A., Buongiorno, J., Maki, J.T., Hobbins, R.R., Miller, G.K., Nucl. Eng. Des. 222, 281 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Petti, D.A., Glover, S.B., Maki, J.T., “Status of the First Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Irradiation Experiment in the Advanced Test Reactor,” paper presented at 4th International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, HTR2008, Washington, D.C., 28 September–1 October 2008.Google Scholar
10 Kittel, J.H., Frost, B.R.T., Mustellier, J.P., Bagley, K.Q., Crittenden, G.C., Dievoet, J.V., J. Nucl. Mater. 204, 1 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Crawford, D.C., Porter, D.L., Hayes, S.L., J. Nucl. Mater. 371, 202 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Boltax, A., in Fuel Pin Mechanical Behavior: Ten Years of LMR Experience (American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, 11–15 November 1990) pp. 217–222.Google Scholar
13 Hofman, G.L., Walters, L.C., Bauer, T.H., Prog. Nucl. Energy 31, 83 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Matzke, H., Ed., Science of Advanced LMFBR Fuels (Elsevier, New York, 1986), chap. 10.Google Scholar
15 Raj, B., Kamath, H.S., Natarajan, R., Vasudeva, P.R. Rao, Prog. Nucl. Energy 47, 369 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Chauvin, N., Malo, J.Y., Garnier, J.C., Bertrand, F., Bosq, J.C., Ravenet, A., Lorenzo, D., Pelletier, M., Escleine, J.M., Munoz, I., Bonnerot, J.M., “GFR Fuel and Core Pre-Conceptual Design Studies,” paper presented at GLOBAL'07 Conference on Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Systems, Boise, ID, 9–13 September 2007.Google Scholar
17 Sauder, C., Lamon, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90 (4) 1146 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Mizuno, T., Crawford, D.C., Fromont, M., Lee, J.W., Abram, T., Babelot, J.-F., “Status of the Advanced Fuel Project for Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor as a Generation IV Nuclear Energy System,” paper presented at GLOBAL 2005, Tsukuba, Japan, 9–13 October 2005.Google Scholar
19 Kato, T., Uozumi, K., Inoue, T., Shirai, O., Iwai, T., Arai, Y., “Recovery of Plutonium and Uranium into Liquid Cadmium Cathodes at High Current Densities,” paper presented at GLOBAL 2003, New Orleans, LA, 16–20 November 2003.Google Scholar
20 Inoue, M., Iwai, T., Arai, Y., Asaga, T., “Irradiation Performance of. Uranium-Plutonium Mixed Nitride Fuel Pins in JOYO,” paper presented at GLOBAL 2003, New Orleans, LA, 16–20, November 2003.Google Scholar