No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Importance of New Processing Techniques in Tissue Engineering
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2013
Extract
Tissue engineering offers the possibility to create completely natural tissue and replace failing or malfunctioning organs. In many cases, biocompatible, biodegradable polymers are utilized to either induce surrounding tissue and cell ingrowth or to serve as a temporary scaffold for transplanted cells to attach, grow, and maintain differentiated functions. Various processing techniques have therefore been developed to fabricate polymers with specific properties to meet the needs of a particular organ.
Polymer scaffolds must possess unique physical and chemical properties for specific applications and must satisfy some basic requirements for tissue engineering. These scaffolds may be implanted without cells, and the regeneration depends on ingrowth of surrounding tissue to such materials—a process known as tissue induction. Alternatively cells may be seeded into a porous polymer. The cell-polymer construct is then transplanted. In either case, one essential criterion for the scaffold is biocompatibility—that is, the polymer scaffolds and their degradation products should not invoke an adverse immune response or toxicity.
Because of the problems associated with long-term implants, such as infection, fibrous tissue formation, and the possible need for retrieval, the role of polymer scaffolds should only be a temporary one. The degradation rate is optimized to allow transplanted cells to proliferate and secrete their own extracellular matrix (ECM) while polymer scaffolds can vanish when necessary to leave enough space for new tissue growth. Biodegradability of a polymer is determined by its composition, molecular weight (MW), MW distribution, degree of crystallinity, and environmental conditions such as temperature and pH. Mechanical loading of the scaffold may affect its degradation.
Information
- Type
- Tissue Engineering
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996
References
3.Thomson, R.C., Wake, M.C., Yaszemski, M.J., and Mikos, A.G., Adv. Polym. Sci. 122 (1995) p. 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Thompson, D.E., Agrawal, C.M., and Athanasiou, K., Tissue Eng. 2 (1996) p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Mikos, A.G., Sarakinos, G., Lyman, M.D., Ingber, D.E., Vacanti, J.P., and Langer, R., Biotech. Bioeng. 42 (1993) p. 716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Boyan, B.D., Hummert, T.W., Dean, D.D., and Schwartz, Z., Biomaterials 17 (1996) p. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Wake, M.C., Patrick, C.W. Jr., and Mikos, A.G., Cell Transplant. 3 (1994) p. 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Vacanti, C.A., Langer, R., Schloo, B., and Vacanti, J.P., Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 88 (1991) p. 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Mooney, D., Hansen, L., Vacanti, J., Langer, R., Farmer, S., and Ingber, D., J. Cell Physiol. 151 (1992) p. 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Giordano, G.G., Thomson, R.C., Ishaug, S.L., Mikos, A.G., Cumber, S., Garcia, C.A., and Lahiri-Munir, D., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. in press.Google Scholar
12.Moghe, P.V., Berthiaume, F., Ezzell, R.M., Toner, M., Tompkins, R.G., and Yarmush, M.L., Biomaterials 17 (1996) p. 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Vacanti, C.A., Kim, W., Upton, J., Vacanti, M.P., Mooney, D., Schloo, B., and Vacanti, J.P., Transplant. Proc. 25 (1993) p. 1019.Google Scholar
14.Freed, L.E., Marquis, J.C., Nohria, A., Emmanual, J., Mikos, A.G., and Langer, R., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 (1993) p. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Ishaug, S.L., Yaszemski, M.J., Bizios, R., and Mikos, A.G., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28 (1994) p. 1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Mikos, A.G., Bao, Y., Cima, L.G., Ingber, D.E., Vacanti, J.P., and Langer, R., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 (1993) p. 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Mooney, D.J., Mazzoni, C.L., Organ, G.M., Puelacher, W.C., Vacanti, J.P., and Langer, R., in Biomaterials for Drug and Cell Delivery, edited by Mikos, A.G., Murphy, R.M., Bernstein, H., and Peppas, N.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 331, Pittsburgh, 1994) p. 47.Google Scholar
19.Mikos, A.G., Thorsen, A.J., Czerwonka, L.A., Bao, Y., and Langer, R., Polymer 35 (1994) p. 1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Ishaug, S.L., Crane, G.M., Miller, M.J., Yasko, A.W., Yaszemski, M.J., and Mikos, A.G., “Bone Formation by Three-Dimensional Stromal Osteoblast Culture in Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res in press.Google Scholar
21.Wake, M.C., Gupta, P.K., and Mikos, A.G., Cell Transplant. 5 (1996) p. 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Mikos, A.G., Sarakinos, G., Leite, S.M., Vacanti, J.P., and Langer, R., Biomaterials 14 (1993) p. 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Mooney, D.J., Organ, G., Vacanti, J.P., and Langer, R., Cell Transplant. 3 (1994) p. 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Thomson, R.C., Yaszemski, M.J., Powers, J.M., and Mikos, A.G., J. Biomater. Sci. Polytn. Edn. 7 (1995) p. 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Thomson, R.C., Yaszemski, M.J., Powers, J.M., and Mikos, A.G., in Polymers in Medicine and Pharmacy, edited by Mikos, A.G., Leong, K.W., Yaszemski, M.J., Tamada, J.A., and Radomsky, M.L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 394, Pittsburgh, 1995) p. 25.Google Scholar
27.Mooney, D.J., Baldwin, D.F., Suh, N.P., Vacanti, J.P., and Langer, R., Biomaterials 17 (1996) p. 1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 196
- Cited by