Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T02:30:26.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paperlike Microencapsulated Electrophoretic Materials and Displays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Peter T. Kazlas and
Michael D. McCreary
Get access

Abstract

Microencapsulated electrophoretic (MEP) materials exhibit high optical reflectance and contrast, wide viewing angle, high resolution, and excellent image stability. MEP materials can be easily printed on large plastic sheets and laminated to a variety of electronic backplanes to construct displays. The combination of a MEP material with flexible transistor technologies enables displays that offer both the look and form of the printed page. This article reviews the basic architecture and properties of MEP materials and describes the integration of MEP materials with transistor backplanes to produce high-resolution, low-power, paperlike displays. Recent developments in ultrathin flexible displays are also reported.

Keywords

colloidal materialselectro-optic materialselectrophoretic materialsflat-panel displaysmicroencapsulated electrophoretic (MEP) materialsoptical propertiesultrathin flexible displays.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 27 , Issue 11: Advanced Flat-Panel Displays and Materials , November 2002, pp. 894 - 897
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Comiskey, B., Albert, J.D., and Jacobson, J., in SID Int. Symp. Digest of Tech. Papers, Boston, 1997 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 1997) p. 75.Google Scholar
2.Comiskey, B., Albert, J.D., Yoshizawa, H., and Jacobson, J., Nature 394 (1998) p. 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Drzaic, P., Comiskey, B., Albert, J.D., Zhang, L., Loxley, A., Feeney, R., and Jacobson, J., in SID Int. Symp. Digest of Tech. Papers, Anaheim, 1998 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 1998) p. 1131.Google Scholar
4.Nakamura, E., Kawai, H., Kanae, N., and Yamamoto, H., in SID Int. Symp. Digest of Tech. Papers, Anaheim, 1998 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 1998) p. 1014.Google Scholar
5.Danner, G.M., Fiske, T.G., and Silverstein, L.D., in Proc. 21st Int. Display Research Conf., Nagoya, 2001 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 2001) p. 1653.Google Scholar
6.Pitt, M., Zehner, R.W., Amundson, K.R., and Gates, H., in SID Int. Symp. Digest of Tech. Papers, Boston, 2002 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 2002) p. 1378.Google Scholar
7.Webber, R.M., in SID Int. Symp. Digest of Tech. Papers, Boston, 2002 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 2002) p. 126.Google Scholar
8.Kazlas, P., Au, J., Geramita, K., Gates, H., Steiner, M., Honeyman, C., Drzaic, P., Schleupen, K., Wisnieff, B., Horton, R., and John, R., in SID Int. Symp. Digest of Tech. Papers, San Jose, 2001 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 2001) p. 152.Google Scholar
9.Inoue, S., Sadao, K., Ozawa, T., Kobashi, Y., Kawai, H., Kitagawa, T., and Shimoda, T., in Proc. IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscat-away, NJ, 2000) p. 197.Google Scholar
10.Chen, Y., Kazlas, P., Denis, K., and Drzaic, P., in SID Int. Symp. Digest of Tech. Papers, San Jose, 2001 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 2001) p. 157.Google Scholar
11.Amundson, K., Ewing, J., Kazlas, P., McCarthy, R., Albert, J.D., Zehner, R., Drzaic, P., Rogers, J., Bao, Z., and Baldwin, K., in SID Int. Symp. Digest of Tech. Papers, San Jose, 2001 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 2001) p. 160.Google Scholar
12.Duthaler, G., Au, J., Davis, M., Gates, H., Hone, B., Knaian, A., Pratt, E., Suzuki, K., Yoshida, S., Ueda, M., and Nakamura, T., in SID Int. Symp. Digest of Tech. Papers, Boston, 2002 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 2002) p. 1374.Google Scholar
13.Theiss, S.D., Wu, C.C., Lu, M., Sturm, J.C., and Wagner, S., in Flat-Panel Display Materials III, edited by Fulks, R.T., Parsons, G.N., Slobodin, D.E., and Yuzuriha, T.H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 471, Pittsburgh, 1997) p. 21.Google Scholar
14.Gleskova, H. and Wagner, S., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 20 (1999) p. 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Wu, C.C., Theiss, S.D., Gu, G., Lu, M.H., Sturm, J.C., Wagner, S., and Forrest, S.R., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 18 (1997) p. 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Kazlas, P., Ritenour, A., Au, J., Chen, Y., Goodman, J., Paolini, R., and Gates, H., in Proc. 22nd Int. Display Research Conf., Nice, 2002 (Society for Information Display, San Jose, 2002) p. 259.Google Scholar
17.E Ink Corporation, electronic ink technology page, http://www.eink.com/technology/ (accessed October 2002).Google Scholar
18.Kumar, A. and Whitesides, G.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 (1993) p. 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Sirringhaus, H., Tessler, N., and Friend, R.H., Science 280 (1998) p. 1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Rogers, J.A., Bao, Z., and Makhija, A., Adv. Mater. 11 (1999) p. 741.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Ridley, B.A., Nivi, B., and Jacobson, J.M., Science 286 (1999) p. 746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar