Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:04:15.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Device processing and junction formation needs for ultra-high power Ga2O3 electronics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2019

Fan Ren
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32611, USA
J.C. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32611, USA
Chaker Fares
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32611, USA
S.J. Pearton*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32611, USA
*
Address all correspondence to S.J. Pearton at spear@mse.ufl.edu

Abstract

A review is given of the future device processing needs for Ga2O3 power electronics. The two main devices employed in power converters and wireless charging systems will be vertical rectifiers and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs). The rectifiers involve thick epitaxial layers on conducting substrates and require stable Schottky contacts, edge termination methods to reduce electric field crowding, dry etch patterning in the case of trench structures, and low resistance Ohmic contacts in which ion implantation or low bandgap interfacial oxides are used to minimize the specific contact resistance. The MOSFETs also require spatially localized doping enhancement for low source/drain contact resistance, stable gate insulators with acceptable band offsets relative to the Ga2O3 to ensure adequate carrier confinement, and enhancement mode capability. Attempts are being made to mitigate the absence of p-type doping capability for Ga2O3 by developing p-type oxide heterojunctions with n-type Ga2O3. Success in this area would lead to minority carrier devices with better on-state performance and a much-improved range of functionality, such as p-i-n diodes, Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors, and thyristors.

Information

Type
Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (top) Qualitative representation of the technology development status of the different polymorphs of Ga2O3 and (bottom left) unit cell along (010) direction and (bottom right) normal to the (100) surface of β-Ga2O3.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Evolution of Si power electronics based on both majority and minority carrier devices and the beginning of the availability of SiC and GaN devices to provide higher performance.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Schematic cross-section of GaN power transistor with integrated nanocrystalline diamond coatings for improved heat dissipation.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Schematic of processing sequence for Ga2O3 power rectifier, showing edge termination, thermally stable Schottky, and low resistance Ohmic.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Schematic of trench MOS Schottky diode. Reprinted with permission from ref. 5 (IEEE, 2018).

Figure 5

Figure 6. SIMS profiles of Mg or N implants into Ga2O3 before and after annealing at different temperatures. In (a), Mg profiles in heavily Sn-doped substrates before and annealing at 800–1000 °C, (b) Mg profiles in lightly Sn-doped substrates before and after annealing at 800–1000 °C and (c) N and Si profiles in undoped substrates before and after annealing at 1100–1200 °C. [Reprinted with permission from ref. 34 (American Institute of Physics, 2018)].

Figure 6

Figure 7. Band alignments for contact interlayer materials on Ga2O3.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Barrier height metals on Ga2O3 as a function of metal work function, showing only a weak correlation with the values expected from the Schottky–Mott relationship.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Dielectric constants and bandgaps for different dielectrics and potential contact materials on Ga2O3.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Band alignments for common dielectrics on Ga2O3.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Breakdown voltage versus drift layer thickness for vertical Ga2O3 rectifiers, with experimentally reported values.