Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:07:56.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations of Surfaces by Electron Microscopy During STM Operation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J.C.H. Spence,
U. Knipping,
R. Norton,
W. Lo and
M. Kuwabara
J.C.H. Spence
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287
U. Knipping
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287
R. Norton
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287
W. Lo
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287
M. Kuwabara
Affiliation:
I.B.M. James Watson Lab. Yorktown Heights New York 10598.
Get access

Abstract

A scanning tunnelling microscope is described which operates inside a transmission electron microscope in the reflection mode. The device is used to study the mechanism of STM contrast in graphite and semiconductors. It allows for the observation of any strain during tunnelling, using the reflection electron diffraction contrast mechanism. The first results of our new transputer-based digital imaging system for STM are reported.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 159: Symposium C – Atomic Scale Structure of Interfaces , 1989, 275
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Binnig, G. and Smith, D.P.E.. Rev. Sci. Instruments. 57, 1688 (1986)Google Scholar
2. Spence, J.C.H., Ultramicros. 25, 165 (1988).Google Scholar
3.Designed and constructed by Knipping, U. and Norton, R..Google Scholar
4. Hsu, T. and Cowley, J.M., Ultramicros. 11, p. 293(1983).Google Scholar
5. Colton, R.J., J.Vac. Sci. Tech. A6, p.349 (1988)Google Scholar
6. Batra, I.P. and Ciraci, S.. J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A6, p.313 (1988)Google Scholar
7. Tabor, D. and Winterton, R.H.S.. Proc. Roy. Soc. A312, p. 435(1969).Google Scholar
8. Burnham, N. and Colton, R. J.. J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A7, p. 2906(1989).Google Scholar
9. Kuwabara, M., Lo, W. and Spence, J.C.H.. J. Vac. Sci Tech A7, p. 2745 (1989)Google Scholar
10. Kuwabara, M., Lo, W. and Spence, J.C.H.. Proc. 47th Ann. EMSA meeting. 1989. Bailey, G. Ed. San Francisco Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
11. Lindsay, S.M., Sankey, O.F., Li, Y., Herbst, C. and Rupprecht, A.. (1989) J. Phys. Chem. submitted.Google Scholar
12. Sneddon, I.F.. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47 (1965).Google Scholar
13. Intermolecular and surface forces. Israelachvili, J.N.. Academic Press. 1985.Google Scholar