Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T20:18:31.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technetium Behavior in Sulfide and Ferrous Iron Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Suk Y. Lee and
Ernest A. Bondietti
Suk Y. Lee
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
Ernest A. Bondietti
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
Get access

Abstract

Pertechnetate oxyanion (99TcO4 −), a potentially mobile species in leachate from a breached radioactive waste repository, was removed from a brine solution by precipitation with sulfide, iron, and ferrous sulfide at environmental pH's. Maghemite (γ-Fe23 ) and goethite (α-FeOOH) were the dominant minerals in the precipitate obtained from the TcO4 −)-ferrous iron reaction. The observation of small particle size and poor crystallinity of the minerals formed in the presence of Tc suggested that the Tc was incorporated into the mineral structure after reduction to a lower valence state. Amorphous ferrous sulfide, an initial phase precipitating in the TcOÝ-ferrous iron-sulfide reaction, was transformed to goethite and hematite (α-Fe2O3 ) on aging. The black precipitate obtained from the TcOÝ-sulfide reaction was poorly crystallized technetium sulfide (Tc2S7 ) which was insoluble in both acid and alkaline solution in the absence of strong oxidants. The results suggested that ferrous- and/or sulfide-bearing groundwaters and minerals in host rocks or backfill barriers could reduce the mobility of Tc through the formation of less-soluble Tc-bearing iron and/or sulfide minerals.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Energy Research and Development Administration, Publication 76–43, vol. 4 (ERDA, Washington, D.C. 1976).Google Scholar
2. Bondietti, E. A. and Francis, C. W., Science 203, 1337 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Allard, B., Kigatsi, H., and Torstenfelt, B., Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 37, 223 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Francis, C. W. and Bondietti, E. A., Task 4 Third Contractor Information Meeting, vol. 2, CONF-7910160 (PNL, Richland, Washington 1979) pp. 81–132.Google Scholar
5. Jacobi, E., Helv. Chim. Acta 31, 2118 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fried, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 70, 741 (1951).Google Scholar
7. van Oosterhout, G. W., Acta Crystallogr. 13, 932 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Thiel, R., Anorg, Z.. Allg. Chem. 326, 70 (1963).Google Scholar
9. Fey, M. V. and Dixon, J. B., Clays Clay Miner. 29, 91 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Rimshaw, S. J., U.S. Patent 3,005,683 (1961).Google Scholar
11. Lewis, D. G. and Schwertmann, U., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 78, 543 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Schwertmann, U. and Taylor, R. M., in: Minerals in Soil Environments, Dixon, J. B., Weed, S. B. eds. (Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, Wisconsin 1977) pp. 145–176.Google Scholar