Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T05:11:42.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biodegradable Microfluidic Scaffolds with Tunable Degradation Properties from Amino Alcohol-based Poly(ester amide) Elastomers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2011

Jane Wang,
Tatiana Kniazeva,
Carly F. Campbell,
Robert Langer,
Jeffrey S. Ustin and
Jeffrey T. Borenstein
Jane Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 02139Biomedical Engineering, Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA, 02139Program of Polymer Science and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 02139
Tatiana Kniazeva
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering, Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA, 02139
Carly F. Campbell
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering, Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA, 02139
Robert Langer
Affiliation:
Program of Polymer Science and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 02139Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 02139
Jeffrey S. Ustin
Affiliation:
Trauma Surgery, Cleveland MetroHealth Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA, 44106
Jeffrey T. Borenstein
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering, Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA, 02139
Get access

Abstract

Biodegradable polymers with high mechanical strength, flexibility and optical transparency, optimal degradation properties and biocompatibility are critical to the success of tissue engineered devices and drug delivery systems. In this work, microfluidic devices have been fabricated from elastomeric scaffolds with tunable degradation properties for applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Most biodegradable polymers suffer from short half life resulting from rapid and poorly controlled degradation upon implantation, exceedingly high stiffness, and limited compatibility with chemical functionalization. Here we report the first microfluidic devices constructed from a recently developed class of biodegradable elastomeric poly(ester amide)s, poly(1,3-diamino-2-hydroxypropane-co-polyol sebacate)s (APS), showing a much longer and highly tunable in vivo degradation half-life comparing to many other commonly used biodegradable polymers. The device is molded in a similar approach to that reported previously for conventional biodegradable polymers, and the bonded microfluidic channels are shown to be capable of supporting physiologic levels of flow and pressure. The device has been tested for degradation rate and gas permeation properties in order to predict performance in the implantation environment. This device is high resolution and fully biodegradable; the fabrication process is fast, inexpensive, reproducible, and scalable, making it the approach ideal for both rapid prototyping and manufacturing of tissue engineering scaffolds and vasculature and tissue and organ replacements.

Keywords

biomaterialmicroelectro-mechanical (MEMS)polymer

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1299: Symposium S – Microelectromechanical Systems—Materials and Devices IV , 2011, mrsf10-1299-s11-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Borenstein, J. T., Terai, H., King, K. R., Weinberg, E. J., Kaazempur-Mofrad, M. R. and Vacanti, J. P., Biomedical Microdevices 4(3), 167–175 (2002).10.1023/A:1016040212127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Armani, D. K. and Liu, C., Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 10(1), 80–84 (2000).Google Scholar
3. King, K. R., Wang, C. C. J., Kaazempur-Mofrad, M. R., Vacanti, J. P. and Borenstein, J. T., Advanced Materials 16(22), 2007–12 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Liu Tsang, V., Chen, A. A., Cho, L. M., Jadin, K. D., Sah, R. L., DeLong, S., West, J. L. and Bhatia, S. N., FASEB J 21(3), 790–801 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Wang, Y. D., Ameer, G. A., Sheppard, B. J. and Langer, R., Nature Biotechnology 20(6), 602–606 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Bettinger, C. J., Bruggeman, J. P., Borenstein, J. T. and Langer, R. S., Biomaterials 29(15), 2315–2325 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bettinger, C. J., Pure and Applied Chemistry 81(12), 2183–2201 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bettinger, C. J., Weinberg, E. J., Kulig, K. M., Vacanti, J. P., Wang, Y. D., Borenstein, J. T. and Langer, R., Advanced Materials 18(2), 165–9 (2006).Google Scholar
9. Fidkowski, C., Kaazempur-Mofrad, M. R., Borenstein, J., Vacanti, J. P., Langer, R. and Wang, Y. D., Tissue Engineering 11(1-2), 302–309 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Borenstein, J. T., Tupper, M. M., Mack, P. J., Weinberg, E. J., Khalil, A. S., Hsiao, J. and Garcia-Cardena, G., Biomedical Microdevices 12(1), 71–79 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Bettinger, C. J., Cyr, K. M., Matsumoto, A., Langer, R., Borenstein, J. T. and Kaplan, D. L., Advanced Materials 19(19), 2847–50 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Borenstein, J. T., Weinberg, E. J., Vacanti, J. P. and Kaazempur-Mofrad, M. R., in Micro and Nanoengineering of the Cell Microenvironment, edited by Khademhosseini, A., Borenstein, J. T., Toner, M. and Takayama, S. (Artech House, Boston, 2008).Google Scholar
13. Bettinger, C. J., Kulig, K. M., Vacanti, J. P., Langer, R. and Borenstein, J. T., Tissue Engineering Part A 15(6), 1321–1329 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar