Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:26:51.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decomposition of Universal AC Ionic Conductivity Response into Two Ranges with Constant Exponents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

B.S. Lim and
A.S. Nowick
B.S. Lim
Affiliation:
Columbia University, Henry Krumb School of Mines, New York, NY 10027.
A.S. Nowick
Affiliation:
Columbia University, Henry Krumb School of Mines, New York, NY 10027.
Get access

Abstract

Many disordered materials both crystalline and glasses show universal dynamic response [1], which is characterized by appropriate power-laws. The ac-conductivity as a function of frequency, is given by: σ(ω)=σ(0)+ Aωs where σ(0) is the dc-conductivity and the exponent s (≤1) generally decreases with increasing temperature. In previous work on ionically conducting crystals and glasses, we have observed two ranges in which s = constant, independent of temperature: at high temperatures, s=so (a value between 0.5 and 0.6) and, at low temperatures, s = 1. Further for the s = so region, the parameter A is activated with activation energy related to that of σ(0), while for the s = 1 region, A varies only slowly with temperature. For the cases of borate and silicate glasses as well as for crystalline CaTiO3 doped with 30% A13+, careful analysis was carried out over the region in which the effective s falls from 1.0 to so. The results show that this region can be described by the relation: σ(ω)= σ(0) + Aωs0 + A'ωl.0 with parameters A and A’ consistent with those obtained from the high and low- temperature regions, respectively. Thus, we conclude that two separate types of universal behavior are superimposed throughout the entire temperature region; each is described by a constant value of s, and is due to an independent mechanism of non-Debye relaxational behavior.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 293: Symposium U – Solid State Ionics III , 1992, 219
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Jonscher, A.K., Dielectric Relaxation in Solids (Chelsea Dielectric Press, London, 1983).Google Scholar
2. Ngai, K.L., Comments on Solid State Physics 9 127 (1979); 2, 141 (1980).Google Scholar
3. See references in [4].Google Scholar
4. Lee, W.K., Lim, B.S., Liu, J.F. and Nowick, A.S., Solid State Ionics, 53–56 (1992), 831.Google Scholar
5. Lee, W.K., Liu, J.F. and Nowick, A.S., Phy. Rev. Letters, 67 (1991), 1559.Google Scholar
6. Almond, D.P. and West, A.R., Solid State Ionics 8, 159 (1983); 9/10, 277 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Bums, A., Chryssikos, G.D., Tombari, E., Cole, R.H., and Risen, W.M. Jr., Physics. Chem. Glasses 30, 264 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Lim, B.S., Vaysleyb, A.V., and Nowick, A.S., Applied Phys. A 56, (1992).Google Scholar
9. Ngai, K.L., Mundy, J.N., Jain, H., Kanert, O., and Balzer-Jollenbeck, G., Phys. Rev. B39, 6169 (1989) and references therein.Google Scholar
10. Funke, K. and Hoppe, R., Solid State Ionics 40/41, 200 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Funke, K., Prog. Solid State Chem. 22, 111 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Lim, B.S. and Nowick, A.S., to be published.Google Scholar