Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T11:53:25.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development Of Foam Glass Structural Insulation Derived from Fly Ash

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

H. Hojaji
H. Hojaji*
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
Get access

Abstract

In the first part of this study, fly ash has been used as a main component in developing glass compositions which are cellulated through carbonization and oxidation processes. The resulting foam glasses have highly uniform closed pore structure and negligible water permeability with densities ranging from 140 kg/m3 to >800 kg/m3. Foam glasses with open pore structure have also been produced and characterized. In the second part, mechanical and thermal properties are discussed. These include the stressing rate effect on the fracture strength in compressive and flexural loading for different densities. Variations of thermal conductivity and overall strength with density and pore size are also described.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 136: Symposium O – Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products V , 1988, 185
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Hojaji, H., U.S. Patent 4, 430, 108 (2/1984).Google Scholar
2. Kurz, M., U.S. Patent 3,874,861, (4/1975).Google Scholar
3. Imer, E., U.S. Patent 3,592,619, (7/1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Haller, W.G., U.S. Patent 3,758,284, (9/1973).Google Scholar
5. Johnson, D., U.S. Patent 3,945,816, (3/1976).Google Scholar
6. Cordon, W.A., Properties. Evaluation and Control of Engineering Materials, (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1979) pp. 77–78.Google Scholar
7. Williams, T., Development of a Foamed Glass Power Pole Derived from Fly Ash, Final Report, EPRI, TD–126 (1976).Google Scholar
8. Uhlmann, D. and Kreidl, N.J., Glass Science and Technoloy 1, (Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1983), pp. 158–183.Google Scholar
9. Bansal, N.P. and Doremus, R.H., Handbook of Glass Properties, (Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1986), p. 266.Google Scholar
10. Weyl, W.A., Coloured Glasses, (Soc. of Glass Technology, Sheffield, England, 1976), pp. 92–1120.Google Scholar
11. Morgan, J.S., Wood, J.L. and Bradt, R.C., Mat. Sci. Eng. 47, 37 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Zwissler, J.G. and Adams, M.A., “Fracture Mechanics of Cellular Glass,” in Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, University Park, PA, July 1981.Google Scholar
13. Wiederhorn, S.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,52., 95 (1969).Google Scholar
14. Conley, P.H., Chandan, H.C. and Bradt, R.C., in Dynamic Fatigue of Foamed Glass. In Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics. IV, edited by Bradt, R.C. et al. (Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. 1978).Google Scholar
16. Ritter, J.E. Jr., Engineering Design and Fatigue Failure of Brittle Materials. in Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics. IV, edited by Bradt, R.C. et al., (Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. 1978).Google Scholar
17. Coble, R.L., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 787 (1961).Google Scholar
18. Experimental Investigation of Effect of Porosity on Thermal Conductivity, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 32, 99 (1954).Google Scholar
19. ASTM, C 518–70, “Thermal Conductivity of Materials by Means of the Heat Flow Meter,” American National Standards Institute.Google Scholar
20. Vos, B.H., Appl. Sci. Res. A5, 425 (1956).Google Scholar
21. Bucknam, M.A. et al., The Measurement of the Thermal Conductivity of Refractories by the Laser-Flash Method, Interim Report to Office of Naval Research, NR 032588, (1982) pp. 2–15.Google Scholar
22. Boer, J., Buttler, J., Grosskopf, B. and Jeschke, P., Refract. J. No. 5, 22 (1980).Google Scholar
23. Fine, H.A., Thermal Transmission Measurements of Insulation, ASTM STP 660, edited by Tye, R.P., (Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials, 1978), pp. 147–153.Google Scholar
24. Jackson, A.J., Adams, J., and Miller, R.C., Thermal Transmission Measurements of Insulation, ASTM STP 660, edited by Tye, R.P., (Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials (1978), pp. 154–171 Google Scholar
25. Chien, Y-T., Lee, T-T. and Ko, Y-C., Ceramic Bulletin, Am. Ceram. Soc. 1, 718 (1982).Google Scholar
26. Van der Held, E.F.M. and Van Drunen, F.G., Physica 15, 865 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Loeb, A.L., J. Appl. Phys. 22, 282 (1951).Google Scholar
28. Russell, H.W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 18, 1 (1935).Google Scholar
29. Perry, R.H. and Chilton, C.H., Chemical Engineering Handbook (5th Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, N.Y., 1973), pp. 3–215.Google Scholar
30. Weast, R.C., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (64th Ed. CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida, 1984), p. E–6.Google Scholar
31. Kingery, W.D., Bowen, H.K. and Uhlmann, D.R., Introduction to Ceramics (2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., 1975), p. 626.Google Scholar