Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:48:15.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Electron-Hole Interaction and Linear Optical Constants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

L. X. Benedict
L. X. Benedict*
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

We present an ab initio computational scheme to calculate ε(ω) including the screened electron-hole interaction. Results are presented for GaP and optically-pumped GaAs. We also discuss a time-dependent formulation which has some conceptual advantages.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 579: Symposium B – The Optical Properties of Materials , 1999 , 21
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Onida, G., Reining, L., Godby, R.W., Sole, R. Del, Andreoni, W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 818 (1995); S. Albrecht, G. Onida, and L. Reining, Phys. Rev. B 55, 10278 (1997); S. Albrecht, L. Reining, R. Del Sole, and G. Onida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4510 (1998); S. Albrecht, L. Reining, G. Onida, R. Del Sole, Nuovo Cimento D 20D, 949 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Rohlfing, M. and Louie, S.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3320 (1998); Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2312 (1998); Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1959 (1999); Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 856 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Benedict, L.X., Shirley, E.L., and Bohn, R.B., Phys. Rev. B (RC) 57, 9385 (1998); Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4514 (1998); L.X. Benedict and E.L. Shirley, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5441 (1999); L.X. Benedict, T. Wethkamp, K. Wilmers, C. Cobet, N. Esser, E.L. Shirley, W. Richter, and M. Cardona, Sol. Stat. Com. 112, 129 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Sham, L.J. and Rice, T.M., Phys. Rev. 144, 708 (1965); W. Hanke and L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 582 (1974); W. Hanke and L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. B 21, 4656 (1980).Google Scholar
5. More precisely, k is the wave vector of the hole. The wave vector of the electron is k + q, where hq is the photon momentum. It is assumed that q = 0.Google Scholar
6. Levine, Z.H. and Louie, S.G., Phys. Rev. B 25, 6310 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Hybertsen, M.S. and Louie, S.G., Phys. Rev. B 37, 2733 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Haydock, R., Comp. Phys. Com. 20, 11 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited by Hellwege, K.H., Landolt-Bornstein Tables (Springer, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
10. Shirley, E.L., Phys. Rev. B 54, 16464 (1996).Google Scholar
11. For these calculations we use a k-point shift, so that the F-point (k= 0) is shifted to . Such symmetry breaking is not problematic, because it becomes irrelevant when results are converged.Google Scholar
12. The band stretching is taken from the calculation appearing in Zhu, X. and Louie, S.G., Phys. Rev. B 43, 14142 (1991), while the band gap is from the experimental result listed in Ref. 9.Google Scholar
13. Kittel, C., Introduction to Solid State Physics, (John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1986).Google Scholar
14. The data appearing here are the T = 15 K data in Zollner, S., Garriga, M., Kirchner, J., Humlicek, J., Cardona, M., and Neuhold, G., Phys. Rev. B 48, 7915 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Meskini, N., Mattausch, H.J., and Hanke, W., Sol. Stat. Com. 48, 807 (1983).Google Scholar
16. Hughes, J.L.P. and Sipe, J.E., Phys. Rev. B 53, 10751 (1996).Google Scholar
17. Strictly speaking, ø(τ)) describes a fictitious dynamics of an electron-hole pair, since |ø(τ = 0)) ξ|P) = H−λ J|0) involves the Hamiltonian. Viewed differently, |P) can be thought of as frequency-dependent (H−1 in the expression for |P) arises from the I/ω2 prefactor of Eq. 5).Google Scholar
18. The author has not found a single, simple reason for this trend. It may be a combi- nation of variations in electron density, band width (and therefore electron and hole hopping parameters), bond length, etc.Google Scholar
19. The quantity fo dωωτ2 (ω) is equal for non-interacting theories and conserving in- teracting theories, due to the cancellation of repulsive and attractive terms of the interaction. It should be mentioned, however, that the theory we use (characterized by Eqs. 1, 2 and known as the Tamm-Dancoff approximation) is not a conserving approximation. Whether conserving or non-conserving, an attractive term, Hattr, can be defined for which (P|Hattr|P) is non-zero, measuring the downward shift of oscillator strength.Google Scholar
20. Chemla, D.S., Semiconductors and Semimetals, 58, 175 (1999), and references therein.Google Scholar
21. Huang, L., Callan, J.P., Glezer, E.N., and Mazur, E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 185 (1998).Google Scholar
22. LX. Benedict, unpublished.Google Scholar
23. This approximation neglects contributions from virtual transitions between excited electron and hole states. Such contributions can be thought of as giving rise to a widened gap, which would alter tBG(q), particularly near q = 0. Since the free carrier terms dominate at small q, we neglect this correction. We hasten to add that the static screening approximation is not as justified here as it is in the n = 0 case, due to the presence of excited charge-carrier plasmons. Unfortunately, the difficulty of solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation with a dynamically screened interaction for an infinite system precludes the possibility of taking this important effect into account in this work.Google Scholar