Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T09:48:50.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Issues in Potential IMC Application for Aerospace Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Charles H. Ward  and
Andrew S. Culbertson
Charles H. Ward
Affiliation:
Air Force Office of Scientific Research, AFOSR/NC, Boiling AFB, DC 20332-0001
Andrew S. Culbertson
Affiliation:
Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, PO Box 7176, Trenton, NJ 08628-0176
Get access

Abstract

Intermetallic-matrix composites (IMCs) are intended for applications involving higher temperatures and stresses than conventional metallic matrix composites. Consequently, environmental effects, thermo-mechanical fatigue, interfacial thermodynamic stability, creep resistance, processing and cost are only a few of the obstacles to introduction in real products. The primary goal of current IMC development efforts is to provide ‘revolutionary’ materials for components that are enabling technologies in advanced demonstrator gas turbine engines. As compared to production applications, the hurdles for entry into demonstrator engine programs are not as high due to the limited operating time and the small number of parts to be produced. This paper examines the barriers to the introduction of IMCs in the context of application to production aerospace structures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 350: Symposium U – Intermetallic Matrix Composites III , 1994 , 3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Sprague, R., Adv. Mats. & Proc., 133 (1), 67, (1988).Google Scholar
2. Ronald, T.M.F., Adv. Mats. & Proc., 135 (5), 29, (1989).Google Scholar
3. Doychak, J., JOM, 44 (6), 46, (1992).Google Scholar
4. Williams, J.C., International Symposium on Structural Intermetallics, Champion, PA, 1993.Google Scholar
5. Larsen, J. M., Revelos, W.C. and Gambone, M.L., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites II, edited by Miracle, D.B., Anton, D.L. and Graves, J.A., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 273, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
6. Smith, P.R., Graves, J.A. and Rhodes, C.G., in Structural Intermetallics, Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Str. Intermetallics, edited by Darolia, R. et al. , (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1993), pp. 765–771.Google Scholar
7. Larsen, J.M.., Russ, S.M. and Jones, J.W., in Characterization of Fibre Reinforced Titanium Metal Matrix Composites, Report AGARD-R-796, NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD), (Specialised Printing Services Ltd., Loughton, Essex, 1994), pp. 1.1–1.21.Google Scholar
8. Miracle, D.B. and Smith, P.R., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites III, edited by Graves, J.A., Bowman, R.R. and Lewandowski, J.J., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1994).Google Scholar
9. DeBoer, G., Chesnutt, J., Grossman, T. and Sensmeier, M., “Titanium Aluminide Composites,” Final Technical Report, Contract F33657–86-C-2136, (Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 1993).Google Scholar
10. Petrovic, J.J. and Vasudevan, A.K., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites 11, edited by Miracle, D.B., Anton, D.L. and Graves, J.A., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 273, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 229–239.Google Scholar
11. Bowen, R.R., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites II, edited by Miracle, D.B., Anton, D.L. and Graves, J.A., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 273, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 145–155.Google Scholar
12. Amato, R.A., Yang, J-M. and Pank, D.R., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites III, edited by Graves, J.A., Bowman, R.R. and Lewandowski, J.J., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1994).Google Scholar
13. Revelos, W.C. and Smith, P.R., Metall. Trans. A, 23A, 587, (1992).Google Scholar
14. Brisset, F. and Vassel, A., in Structural Intermetallics, Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Str. Intermetallics, edited by Darolia, R. et al. , (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1993), pp. 739–747.Google Scholar
15. Graves, J.A., Muir, A.H. and Rhodes, C.G., “Manufacturing Science for Titanium Aluminide Composite Engine Structures,” WL-TR-92–4100, (Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB,OH, 1992).Google Scholar
16. Gambone, M.L., “Fatigue and Fracture of Titanium Aluminides, Vol. I,” WRDC-TR-89- 4145.1, (Wright Research and Development Center, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 1989).Google Scholar
17. Gambone, M.L., “Fatigue and Fracture of Titanium Aluminides, Vol. II,” WRDC-TR-89–4145.11, (Wright Research and Development Center, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 1989).Google Scholar
18. Sorensen, J., in Structural Intermetallics, Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Str. Intermetallics, edited by Darolia, R. et al. , (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1993), pp. 717–726.Google Scholar
19. Miracle, D. B. and Mendiratta, M.; in Intermetallic Compounds: Principles and Practice, edited by Westbrook, J. H. and Fleischer, R. L., (John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY 1994).Google Scholar
20. Wright, P.K., in Structural Intermetallics, Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Str. Intermetallics, edited by Darolia, R. et al. , (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1993), pp. 885–893.Google Scholar