Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:12:18.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Leed Study of Bismuth Overlayer Formation on InSb(110)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

T. Guo,
K. J. Wan and
W. K. Ford
T. Guo
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Center and the Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
K. J. Wan
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Center and the Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
W. K. Ford
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Center and the Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
Get access

Abstract

LEED and Auger electron spectroscopy have been used to studied the interface formation of bismuth on InSb(110). For the first time, well defined superstructures were observed at room temperature on metal/semimetal-III-V semiconductors. A (1×2) phase, at 0.5 ML bismuth coverage, and a (1×3) phase, at 0.4 ML bismuth coverage, appear with different thermal heat cycling. The dynamical origin of these phases is thought to be a repulsive interaction between overlayer chains due to the detailed geometry of the overlayer chain structure and to the overlayer induced strain field within the substrate.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 159: Symposium C – Atomic Scale Structure of Interfaces , 1989, 39
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Joyce, J. J., Anderson, J., Nelson, M. M., Yu, C., and Lapeyre, G. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A7, 850 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Duke, C. B., Paton, A., Ford, W. K., Kahn, A. and Carelli, J., Phys. Rev. B26, 803 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Duke, C. B., Mailhoit, C., Paton, A., Li, K., Bonapace, C. and Kahn, A., Surf. Sci. 163, 391 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Duke, C. B., Lessor, D. L., Guo, T., and Ford, W. K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. (in press).Google Scholar
9. Duke, C. B., in Surface Properties of Electronic Materialg, ed. King, D. A. and Woodruff, D. P., Chap. 3 ( Elsevier, 1988).Google Scholar
6. Guo, T., Atkinson, R. E., and Ford, W. K., Phys. Rev. B. (submitted).Google Scholar
7. Chang, S.-L., Guo, T., Ford, W. K., Bowler, A., and Hood, E. S., “Kinetics of bismuth overlayer formation on GaAs(110) studied using LEED and time dependent Monte Carlo simulation,” (this conference).Google Scholar
8. Guo, T., Atkinson, R. E., and Ford, W. K., Rev. Sci. Instr. (in press).Google Scholar
9.See, for example, Kahn, A., Surf. Sci. Repts. 1. 193 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Skeath, P., Su, C. Y., Harrison, W. A., Lindau, I. and Spicer, W. E., Phys. Rev. B27, 6246 (1983).Google Scholar
11. LaFemina, J. P., Duke, C. B., and Mailhiot, C., “New surface atomic structures for column V overlayers on the (110) surfaces of IlI-V compound semiconductors,” preprint, 1989.Google Scholar