Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:58:19.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterned Polymer Nanofibers Based Biosensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2011

Timothy O. Mertz,
Vindhya Kunduru,
Prabir K. Patra,
Krishna Vattipalli and
Shalini Prasad
Timothy O. Mertz
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260, U.S.A.
Vindhya Kunduru
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27694, U.S.A.
Prabir K. Patra
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604, U.S.A.
Krishna Vattipalli
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260, U.S.A.
Shalini Prasad
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

“Label-free” biomolecule sensors for detection of inflammatory cardiovascular biomarker associated with vulnerable coronary vascular plaque were designed and fabricated using micro and nano-textured polystyrene structures that functioned as sensing elements coupled with electronic measurement equipment. We demonstrated that scaling down the surface texturing from the micro to the nanoscale enhances the amplitude of the measured signal strength. We believe that the nanoscale fiber morphology provides size matched spaces for trapping and immobilizing the protein biomolecules resulting in enhanced detection and signal strength. We selected polystyrene as the model system and demonstrated the detection of human serum C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). We employed these findings in designing a platform “lab-on-a-chip” protein sensor. Comparative studies were performed on two different polystyrene textured surfaces: a polystyrene microsphere mat, and an electrospun polystyrene nanofiber matrix.

Keywords

polymersensornanoscale

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1358: Symposium MM – Organic Bioelectronics and Photonics for Sensing and Regulation , 2011, mrss11-1358-mm03-07
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Kunduru, V, Prasad, S. Electrokinetic Formation of “Microbridges” for Protein Biomarkers as Sensors. J. Assoc. Lab. Automation 2007; 12: 311–17.10.1016/j.jala.2007.06.001Google Scholar
2. Sagvolden, G, Giaever, I, Feder, J. Characteristic protein adhesion forces on glass and polystyrene substrates by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 1998; 14: 5984–87.10.1021/la980271bGoogle Scholar
3. Bangs Laboratories Inc., “Adsoprtion to Microspheres”, retrieved from: http://www.bangslabs.com/technotes/204.pdf, 2008.Google Scholar
4. Wu, J, Fu, Z, Yan, F, Ju, H. Biomedical and clinical applications of immunoassays and immunosensors for tumor markers. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 2007; 26: 679–88.10.1016/j.trac.2007.05.007Google Scholar
5. Vulnerable Plaques: A Brief Review of the Concept and Proposed Approaches to Diagnosis and Treatment http://www.ahrq.gov/Clinic/ta/placque/placque.pdf, 2004.Google Scholar
6. American Heart Association, “Inflammation, Heart Disease and Stroke: The Role of C-Reactive Protein”, retrieved from: http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4648, 2003.Google Scholar
7. Darain, F, Park, DS, Park, JS, Shim, YB. Superoxide radical sensing using a cytochrome c- 3 immobilized conducting polymer electrode Biosens Bioelectron 2004; 19:1245–52.Google Scholar
8. Kisza, AJ. The capacitance of the electric double layer of electrodes in molten salts. Electroanal Chem 2002; 534: 99–106.10.1016/S0022-0728(02)01148-8Google Scholar
9. Bothara, M, Venkatraman, V, Reddy, RK, Barrett, T, Carruthers, J, Prasad, S. Nanomonitors: electrical immunoassays for protein biomarker profiling. Nanomedicine 2008; 3: 423–36.10.2217/17435889.3.4.423Google Scholar
10. Rivas, G, Ferrone, F, and Herzfeld, J. Life in a Crowded World. EMBO Reports 2004; 5(1):23–7.10.1038/sj.embor.7400056Google Scholar
11. Chebotareva, NA, Kurganov, BI, Livanova, NB. Biochemical Effects of Molecular Crowding. Biochemistry 2004; 69(11):1239–51.Google Scholar
12. Cheung, MS, Klimov, D, Thirumalai, T. Molecular Crowding Enhances Native State Stability and Refolding Rates of Globular Proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005; 102(13):4753–58.10.1073/pnas.0409630102Google Scholar