Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T17:00:52.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase Transformations on Aging Cu-Al-Ni β Phase Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

S. W. Husain,
P. C. Clapp and
M. Ahmed
S. W. Husain
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268, USA
P. C. Clapp
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268, USA
M. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268, USA
Get access

Abstract

The phase transformations occurring on quenching and subsequent aging of a Cu-Al-Ni β phase alloy have been studied using transmission electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction and optical microscopy. Quenching produces an ordered solid solution, β1, based on the DO3 structure of Cu3A1. X-ray and electron diffraction show satellite diffraction peaks. On aging, these satellite peaks disappear and the parent phase undergoes a martensitic transformation. It is suggested that the parent phase undergoes a process of phase separation through the mechanism of spinodal decomposition before the martensitic transformation occurs. The martensitic transformation shows isothermal kinetics for which a transformation diagram is presented. Prolonged aging results in the formation of equilibrium phases.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 21: Symposium GREECE – Phase Transformations in Solids , 1983, 729
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Husain, S. W., and Clapp, P. C., Proc. Int. Cryogenic Mat. Conf. Butterworths, 146–149 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Kurdyumov, G. V., Lobodyuk, V. A., and Khandros, L. G., Soviet Physics-Crystallography, 6, 165–170 (1961).Google Scholar
3. Otsuka, K., Japan, J. Appl. Phys. 10, 571–579 (1971).Google Scholar
4. Duggin, M. J., and Rachinger, W. A., Acta Met. 12, 529–535 (1964).Google Scholar
5. Hull, D., and Garwood, R. D., J. Inst. Metals, 86, 485–492 (1957).Google Scholar
6. Hasan, F., Jahanafrooz, A., Lorimer, G. W., and Ridley, N., Met. Trans. 13A, 1337–1345 (1982)Google Scholar
7. Bradley, A. J., and Lipson, H., Proc. Roy. Soc. A167, 431–438 (1938).Google Scholar
8. Metals Handbook, ASM, Vol. 8, 8th edition, p. 388.Google Scholar
9. Becker, and Ebert, , Z. Physik., 16, 165–169 (1923).Google Scholar
10. Andrews, K. W. and Hume-Rothery, W., Proc. Roy. Soc. A 178, 464 (1941).Google Scholar
11. Tarora, I., Nippon Kink. Gakk. 13, 1 (1949).Google Scholar
12. Bouchard, M., and Thomas, G., Acta Met. 23, 1485–1500 (1975).Google Scholar
13. Daniel, V., and Lipson, H., Proc. Roy. Soc. A181, 368–378 (1943).Google Scholar
14. Chen, C. W., AIME Trans. 194, Journal of Metals, 1202–1203 (1957).Google Scholar
15. Enami, K., and Nenno, S., Met. Trans. 2, 1487 (1971).Google Scholar