Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:52:29.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems In Realistic Modelling Of Interfacial Reactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Charles W. Allen and
Gordon A Sargent
Charles W. Allen
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556
Gordon A Sargent
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556
Get access

Abstract

For modelling the reaction of chemically distinct materials in which intermediate alloy phases are formed a simple thermodynamic description is not adequate. Despite thermodynamic prediction of multiple product phases, a single phase generally forms first which is not necessarily that of greatest thermodynamic stability or of simplest structure. Such initial reaction processes may be modelled as metastable perltectoid (solid-solid) or perltectlc (solid-liquid) reactions, characterized by large thermodynamic driving forces with superimposed kinetic and morphological constraints. The interfacial reaction problem is reviewed in light of heterogeneous nucleation theory with emphasis on non-classical aspects.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 54: Symposium E – Thin Films–Interfaces and Phenomena , 1985, 97
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1] Gõsele, U. and Tu, K. N., J. Appl. Phys., 53, 3252 (1982).Google Scholar
[2] Ottavianl, G., in Thin Films and Interfaces II, edited by Baglin, J. E. E., Campbell, D. R. and Chu, W. K. (North-Holland Publishers, New York, 1984), p. 21.Google Scholar
[3] Pretorlus, R., in Thin Films and Interfaces II, edited by Baglin, J. E. E., Campbell, D. R. and Chu, W. K. (North-Holland Publishers, New York, 1984), pp. 15–20.Google Scholar
[4] Cahn, J. W. and Hilliard, J. E., J. Chem. Phys., 28, 258 (1958).Google Scholar
[5] Aaronson, H. I. and Russell, K. C., in Solid→Solid Phase Transformations, edited by Aaronson, H. I. et al, (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, 1982), pp. 371–397.Google Scholar
[6] Cahn, J. W. and Hilliard, J. E., J. Chem. Phys., 31, 688 (1959).Google Scholar
[7] Cahn, J. W., Acta Met., 9, 795 (1961); 10, 179 (1962).Google Scholar
[8] Russell, K. C., Adv. in Colloid and Interface Sci., 13, 205 (1980).Google Scholar
[9] Hilliard, J. E., in Phase Transformations, (ASM, Metals Park, 1970), pp.497–560.Google Scholar
[10] Allen, C.W., Fulcher, M. R., Rai, A. S., Sargent, G. A. and Miller, A. E., inElectronic Packaging Materials Science, edited by Geiss, E. A., Tu, K.-N. and Uhlmann, D. R. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1985), pp. 139–144.Google Scholar