Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T22:33:30.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sliver Solar Cell Technology: Pushing the Material Boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

Evan Franklin,
Andrew Blakers,
Klaus Weber and
Vernie Everet
Evan Franklin
Affiliation:
The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia.
Andrew Blakers
Affiliation:
The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia.
Klaus Weber
Affiliation:
The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia.
Vernie Everet
Affiliation:
The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia.
Get access

Abstract

One of the primary objectives of the global photovoltaic research community is to effect significant manufacturing cost reductions, either by reducing material and processing costs or by increasing solar cell efficiency. One very promising technology for achieving both of these goals is Sliver technology, which offers potential for a 10- to 20-fold reduction in the consumption of purified silicon, while at the same time achieving very high cell efficiencies by fully exploiting the advantages of mono-crystalline silicon.

Sliver solar cells are thin, mono-crystalline silicon solar cells fabricated using a combination of micro-machining techniques and standard silicon device fabrication technologies. Rather than fabricating a single solar cell on the surface of a wafer, many hundreds to several thousand individual Sliver solar cells are fabricated within a single wafer. The dimensions of a Sliver cell depend upon wafer size, wafer thickness, and the micro-machining method employed.Cells typically have a length of 5 – 12cm, a width of 0.5 – 2mm, and a thickness of 20 – 60 micron. 20% efficient Sliver solar cells using standard cell processing methods and a robust processing sequence, have been fabricated at ANU. Current research efforts are directed towards developing and establishing new fabrication techniques to further simplify the fabrication sequence and to improve cell efficiency.

This paper presents an overview of Sliver technology. The fabrication method and some key challenges in producing Sliver cells is presented along with the measured performance of cells fabricated in the ANU solar research laboratory.

Keywords

photovoltaicSimachining

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Hering, G., ‘Cell Production Survey 2010, Photon International Magazine, 03/2011 p.186–218, (2011)Google Scholar
2. Solarbuzz, ‘Marketbuzz 2011’, accessed at www.solarbuzz.com [last accessed 24 March 2011], (2011)Google Scholar
3. Breyer, C., Birkner, C., et al. ., ‘Research and development investments in PV – a limiting factor for a fast PV diffusion?’, Proceedings of the 25th PV solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain, (2010)Google Scholar
4. Roder, T., Eisele, S., et al. ., ‘Add-on laser tailored selective emitter solar cells’, Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 18: p.505–510, (2010)Google Scholar
5. Antoniadis, H., Jiang, F., Shan, W. and Liu, Y., ‘All screen-printed mass produced silicon ink selective emitter solar cells’, Proceedings of the 35th IEEE PV Specialists Conference’, Honolulu, USA, (2010)Google Scholar
6. Kray, D., Bay, N. et al. ., ‘High-efficiency large area inducstrial LCP selective emitter solar cells ready for production’, Proceedings of the 25th PV solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain, (2010)Google Scholar
7. Shi, Z., Wenham, S. and Ji, J., ‘Mass production of the innovative PLOTO solar cell technology’, Proceedings of the 34th IEEE PV Specialists Conference’, Philadelphia, USA, (2009)Google Scholar
8. Schmich, E., Gassenbauer, Y., et al. ., ‘Industrial multi-crystalline silicon solar cells with dielectrically passivated rear side and efficiencies above 18%’, Proceedings of the 25th PV solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain, (2010)Google Scholar
9. Kerschaver, E. and Beaucarne, G., ‘Back-contact solar cells: a review’, Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 14: p.107–123, (2006)Google Scholar
10. MWT or similar cell ref, ‘Screen-printed emitter-wrap-through solar cell with single step side selective emitter with 18.8% efficiency’, Progress in Photovoltaics, Article in print / published online August 2010, (2010) Google Scholar
11. Green, M., ‘The Path to 25% Silicon Solar Cell Efficiency: History of Silicon Cell Evolution’, Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 17: p.183–189, (2009)Google Scholar
12. Green, M., ‘Estimates of Te and In Prices from Direct Mining of Known Ores’, Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 17: p.347–359, (2009)Google Scholar
13. Reber, S., Eyer, A., et al. ., ‘Progress in Crystalline Silicon Thin-Film Solar Cell Work at Fraunhofer ISE’, 20th European Photovoltaics Solar Energy Conference, Barcelona, (2005)Google Scholar
14. Terheiden, B., Horbelt, R., and Brendel, R., ‘Thin-film Solar Cells and Modules from the Porous Silicon Process Using 6” Si Substrates’, 21st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Dresden (2006)Google Scholar
15. Aberle, A., ‘Progress in Evaporated Crystalline Silicon Thin-Film Solar Cells on Glass’, 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Hawaii, USA, (2006)Google Scholar
16. Weber, K.J. and Blakers, A.W, Semiconductor Processing PCT/AU01/01546, 2001 Google Scholar
17. Weber, K.J., Blakers, A.W., Stocks, M.J., Babaei, J. H., Everett, V.A., Neuendorf, A.J, and Verlinden, P.J., “A Novel Low Cost, High Efficiency Micromachined Silicon Solar Cell”, Electron Device Letters 25, 37, 2004 Google Scholar
18. Blakers, A.W., Stocks, M.J., Weber, K.J., Everett, V., Babaei, J., Verlinden, P., Kerr, M., Stuckings, M. and Mackey, P., “Sliver® Solar Cells”, 13th NREL workshop on Crystalline Si Materials and Processing, Vail Colorado, 2003 Google Scholar
19. Weber, K.J., Blakers, A.W., Everett, V. and Franklin, E., “Results of a cost model for Sliver® cells”, 21st EC Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Dresden, September 2006 Google Scholar
20. Transform Solar website, www.transformsolar.com, [last accessed 24 March 2011], (2011)Google Scholar
21. Weber, K.J., MacDonald, J., Everett, V.A., Deenapanray, P.N.K., Stocks, M.J. and Blakers, A.W., “Modelling of Sliver® Modules incorporating a lambertian rear reflector”, 19th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Paris, 2004 Google Scholar
22. Franklin, E., Everett, V., Blakers, A. & Weber, K., ‘Sliver Solar Cells: high-efficiency, low-cost PV technology’, Advances in OptoElectronics, Volume 2007, Article ID 35383, doi:10.1155/2007/35383, (2007)Google Scholar
23. Shikida, M., Sato, K., Tokoro, K., and Uchikawa, D., ‘Differences in anisotropic etching properties of KOH and TMAH solutions’, Sensors and actuators, vol. 80: p.179–188, (2000).Google Scholar
24. Steinsland, E., Finstad, T., and Hanneborg, A., ‘Etch rates of (100), (111) and (110) single-crystal silicon in TMAH measured in-situ by laser reflectance interferometry’, Sensors and actuators, vol. 86: p.73–80, (2000)Google Scholar
25. Weber, K. and Blakers, A., Patent number: US2005104163, ‘Semiconductor Texturing Process’, US Patent Office, [Country: USA], (2005).Google Scholar
26. Weber, K. and Blakers, A., ‘A Novel Silicon Texturisation Method Based on Etching Through a Silicon Nitride Mask’, Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 13: p.691–695, (2005).Google Scholar