Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T22:17:43.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure-Property Relationship of Ceramic Coatings Produced by Laser Processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J.Th.M. De Hosson and
X.B. Zhou
J.Th.M. De Hosson
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Materials Science Center, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
X.B. Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Materials Science Center, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Get access

Abstract

This paper deals with a well known puzzling observation that wetting in some instances is improved by a chemical reaction between a liquid and a solid substrate in laser processing while in other systems just the opposite effect takes place. Here, contact angles of liquid Al on SiO2 and liquid Ti on Al2O3 are reported and some results of laser melt injection of SiO2 particles into molten Al.The surface and interface structures were explored by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. According to the experimental observations, it appears that the volume change of ceramic substrates during reaction plays a key role in the effect of chemical reaction on wetting.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1 Kritsalis, P., Drevet, B. and Eustathopoulos, N., Scripta Metall. Mater. 30, 1127 (1994)Google Scholar
2 Li, J. G., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 11, 1551 (1992)Google Scholar
3 Kalogeropoulou, S., Baud, L. and Eustathopoulos, N., Acta Metall. Mater. 43 907 (1995)Google Scholar
4 Nicholas, M. G., Surfaces and interfaces of ceramic materials, Dufour, L. C. et al. (eds.), 393 (1989)Google Scholar
5 Delannay, F., Froyen, L., Deruyttere, A., J. Mater. Sci. 22,1 (1987)Google Scholar
6 Aksay, I. A., Hoge, C. E. and Pask, J. A., J. Phys. Chem. 78, 1178 (1974)Google Scholar
7 Laurent, V., Chatain, D. and Eustathopoulos, N., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A135, 89(1991),Google Scholar
8 IP, S. W., Kucharski, M. and Toguri, J. M., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 12, 1699 (1993)Google Scholar
9 Fujii, H., Nakae, H. and Okada, K., Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 2963 (1993)Google Scholar
10 Laurent, V., Chatain, D., Eustathopoulos, N., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 244 (1987)Google Scholar
11 Adda, Y., Ambroise, M. H. and Barbier, F., Materials Science Forum 155–156, 511 (1994)Google Scholar
12 Eustathopoulos, N., Chatain, D. and Coudurier, L., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A135, 83 (1991)Google Scholar
13 Zhou, X. B. and De Hosson, J. Th. M., Acta Metall et Mat., 42, 1155 (1994)Google Scholar
14 Zhou, X. B. and De Hosson, J. Th. M., J. Mat. Research.,10,1984 (1995).Google Scholar
15 Zhou, X. B. and De Hosson, J. Th. M., J. Mater. Sci. 30, 3571 (1995).Google Scholar
16 Weast, Robert C., (ed), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, The Chemical Rubber Co., (1971–1972), B73,F23Google Scholar
17 Kingery, W. D., Introduction to ceramics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 191 (1960)Google Scholar
18 Wang, D. J. and Wu, S. T., Acta Metall. Mater. 42,4029 (1994)Google Scholar
19 Ikemiya, N., Umemoto, J., Hara, S. and Ogino, K., ISIJ International 33,156 (1993)Google Scholar