Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T04:20:24.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supramolecular Abrasive-free System for Cu CMP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jason Keleher,
Ken Rushing,
Joe Zhao,
Bill Wojtczak and
Yuzhuo Li
Jason Keleher
Affiliation:
Center for Advance Materials Processing, Department of Chemistry, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699
Ken Rushing
Affiliation:
Center for Advance Materials Processing, Department of Chemistry, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699
Joe Zhao
Affiliation:
Center for Advance Materials Processing, Department of Chemistry, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699
Bill Wojtczak
Affiliation:
SACHEM, 821 East Woodward, Austin, Texas 78704
Yuzhuo Li
Affiliation:
Center for Advance Materials Processing, Department of Chemistry, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699
Get access

Abstract

Key issues in CMP today include reduction of surface defectivity and enhancement of planarization efficiency. More specifically, the polished surface should be free of defects such as scratches, pits, corrosion spots, trench copper loss, and residue particles. For copper/low k CMP, one of the most promising strategies to accomplishing these goals is an Abrasive-Free Process (AFP). By eliminating abrasive particles from the process, either free or fixed to the pad, it has been anticipated and realized that defects such as severe scratching, particle contamination and slurry instability via particle aggregation or settling will be significantly reduced. In addition, with proper formulation, an abrasive free process can also yield an excellent over polishing window and desired step function of pressure for material removal rate. Coupled with a supramolecular design, some of the characteristic advantages seen in abrasive containing system such as step height reduction efficiency can be realized without the side effects often introduced from solid particles. In this presentation, some designing principles for an abrasive free system will be first presented. The potential advantages of a supramolecular design for copper CMP will be illustrated. The CMP performance on a set of testing blanket and patterned wafers will be discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 767: Symposium F – Chemical-Mechanical Planarization , 2003, F6.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. , Kamigata, , Yasuo; , Kurata, , Yasushi; , Masuda, , Katsuyuki, and others Source: Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings {Materials Research Society}671, no. Chemical-Mechanical Polishing 2001--Advances and Future Challenges (2001): M1.3/1-M1.3/12.Google Scholar
2. Kondo, S; Sakuma, N.; Homma, Y.; Goto, Y.; Ohashi, N.; Yamaguchi, H.; Owada, N.; Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 147(10), 2000, pgs. 3907–3913 Google Scholar
3. Grief, M., Trojan, D., Murella, K.. Process Characterization of Copper Polishing Using Abrasive Free Slurry on Orbital and Rotational Platforms. 6th International Symposium on Chemical-Mechanical Polishing, 2001.Google Scholar
4. Gotkis, Y. et al. ; Selectivity Switch Concept in Cu Chemical Mechanical Planarization and its Implementation on Orbital Tools, American Vacuum Society, 2262–2271, 1999 Google Scholar
5. , Konovalov, Valery, V.; , Metzger, Robert, M.; , Zangari, , Giovanni Source: Proceedings-Electrochemical Society {Electrochemical Society}99-34, no. Electrochemical Technology Applications in Electronics (2000): 203–208 Google Scholar
6. Nguyen, J.; Martin, G.; Carpio, R.; Grief, M.; Joshi, S.; Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings {Materials Research Society}732E, Chemical-Mechanical Polishing (2002): I1.4 Google Scholar
7. Hariharaputhiran, M.; Zhang, J.; Ramarajan, S.; Keleher, J.J.; Li, Y.; Babu, S.V.; Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 147(10), 2000, pgs. 3820–3826 Google Scholar
8. Southall, Noel T.; Dill, Ken A.; Haymet, A. D. J; Journal of Physical Chemistry B {American Chemical Society}106, no. 3 (2002): 521–533 Google Scholar
9. , Zalipsky, , Samuel; Polymer Preprints (American Chemical Society, Division of Polymer Chemistry) {American Chemical Society, Division of Polymer Chemistry}38, no. 1 (1997): 539–540 Google Scholar
10. Ungar, Goran; Liu, Yongsong; Zeng, Xiangbing et al. ; Science (Washington, DC, United States) {American Association for the Advancement of Science}299, no. 5610 (2003): 1208–1211 Google Scholar
11. Laughlin, R.G.; The Aqueous Phase Behavior of Surfactants, Academic Press, 1994, ISBN#: 0-12-437760-2Google Scholar