Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:14:14.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How not to prove the Alon-Tarsi conjecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2016

Douglas S. Stones
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences and Clayton School of Information Technology Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia the_empty_element@yahoo.com
Ian M. Wanless
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia ian.wanless@monash.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The sign of a Latin square is −1 if it has an odd number of rows and columns that are odd permutations; otherwise, it is +1. Let LEn and Lon be, respectively, the number of Latin squares of order n with sign +1 and −1. The Alon-Tarsi conjecture asserts that LEn ≠ Lon when n is even. Drisko showed that LEp+1 ≢ Lop+1 (mod p 3) for prime p ≥ 3and asked if similar congruences hold for orders of the form pk + 1, p + 3, or pq + 1. In this article we show that if t ≤ n, then LE n+1 ≢ L0n+1 (mod t3 ) only if t = n and n is an odd prime, thereby showing that Drisko’s method cannot be extended to encompass any of the three suggested cases. We also extend exact computation to n ≤ 9, discuss asymptotics for Lo/LE , and propose a generalization of the Alon-Tarsi conjecture.

Keywords

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 2012