Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:32:13.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On weak concepts of stability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Gikö Ikegami*
Affiliation:
Nagoya University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The manifold in this paper is assumed to be connected differentiable of class C∞. Let Dr(M) and Ӿr(M) be the set of all diffeomorphisms and vector fields of class Cr on a manifold M with Whitney Cr topology, respectively. In [2], the concept of weak stability is defined. The definition is equivalent to the following ((2.1) of this paper); f∈Dr(M) or X ∈ Ӿr(M) is weakly (allowably) stable if and only if there is a neighborhood U of f or X in Dr(M) or Ӿr(M) such that for any (a suitable) g or Y ∈ U the set of all elements topologically equivalent to g or Y is dense in U, respectively. Here, f, g ∈ Dr(M) are said to be topologically equivalent if they are topologically conjugate and X, Y ∈ Ӿr(M) are said to be topologically equivalent if there is a homeomorphism mapping any trajectory of X onto a trajectory of Y preserving the orientations of the trajectories. Similarly, weak Ω-stability is defined for f and X.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1974