Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:12:09.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

U.S.-Uzbek Partnership and Democratic Reforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Shahram Akbarzadeh
Shahram Akbarzadeh*
Affiliation:
Global Politics at the School of Political and Social Inquiry, Monash University, Australia. Shahram.Akbarzadeh@arts.monash.edu.au
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In March 2002 the United States and Uzbekistan signed a Declaration of Strategic Partnership. This document marked a qualitative break in the international relations of Uzbekistan and, to some degree, the United States' relations with Central Asia. Uzbekistan had sought closer relations with the United States since its independence in September 1991. But the course of U.S.-Uzbek relations was not smooth. Various obstacles hindered Tashkent's progress in making a positive impression on successive U.S. administrations in the last decade of the twentieth century. Tashkent's abysmal human rights record and the snail's pace of democratic reforms made the notion of closer ties with Uzbekistan unsavoury for U.S. policy makers. At the same time, Washington was more concerned with developments in Russia. Other former Soviet republics, especially the five Central Asian states, were relegated to the periphery of the U.S. strategic outlook. But the dramatic events of September 11 and the subsequent U.S.-led “war on terror” changed the geopolitical landscape of Central Asia. The consequent development of ties between Tashkent and Washington was beyond the wildest dreams of Uzbek foreign policy makers. Virtually overnight, Uzbek leaders found themselves in a position to pursue an ambitious foreign policy without being slowed by domestic considerations.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , June 2004, pp. 271 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Notes

2. U.S. Department of State, Uzbekistan, International Religious Freedom Report (Washington, DC, 2001). The Mufti puts the number slightly higher at 2,000 mosques. He also claims that 800 pilgrims from Uzbekistan go to Mecca annually, a marked difference from only two persons per year. See “The Islamic Renaissance of Uzbekistan,” The Muslim, Nos 1/2, 1999, <www.jahon.mfa.uz/Z_P_News/muslim.html>. For a very informative assessment of the early years of independence see Fierman, William, “Policy toward Islam in Uzbekistan in the Gorbachev Era,” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1994, pp. 225–246.CrossRef.+For+a+very+informative+assessment+of+the+early+years+of+independence+see+Fierman,+William,+“Policy+toward+Islam+in+Uzbekistan+in+the+Gorbachev+Era,”+Nationalities+Papers,+Vol.+22,+No.+1,+1994,+pp.+225–246.>Google Scholar

3. Gerasimov, Mikhail, “Religioznyi narkotrafik,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 3 November 1999; International Crisis Group, Central Asia: Islamist Mobilization and Regional Security (Osh and Brussels, 2001), p. vi.Google Scholar

4. Panfilova, Viktoria, “Grazhdane yaponii obreli svobodu,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 26 October 1999.Google Scholar

5. Khanbaian, Armen and Khodarenok, Mikhail, “Pered geostrategicheskoi razvilkoi. Tashkent vinuzhden lavirovat' mezhdu Rossiei i zapodom,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 15 April 2002.Google Scholar

6. Roy, Olivier, “Qibla and the Government House: The Islamic Networks,” SAIS Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2001, p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. See for example Roy, “Qibla and the Government House.”Google Scholar

8. “Peacekeeping Mandate Extended in Tajikistan amid Deadlock in Negotiations and Rise in Tension,” Brightstar Bulletin, February 1996, <http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/53/032.html>..>Google Scholar

9. Jonson, Lena, “Russian Policy and Tajikistan,” Central Asia, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1997, <www.ca-c.org/dataeng/st_03_jonson.shtml>..>Google Scholar

10. RFE/RL Newsline, 7 April 1999.Google Scholar

11. RFE/RL Newsline, 3 and 11 February 1999.Google Scholar

12. GUUAM's official webpage is available on <www.guuam.org>..>Google Scholar

13. The Yalta Charter was signed on 7 June 2001 in Yalta and is available online: <www.ukrainaemb.lv/guuam.htm>..>Google Scholar

14. “GUUAM Teriaet Bukvu. Uzbekistan perekhodit na Storonu Ameriki,” Kommersant, 15 June 2002, pp. 1 and 4.Google Scholar

15. Shanghai Cooperation Organization Summit, Special Press Summary, <www.vic-info.org/RegionsTop.nsf/b0a93faa9a7b902f8a25682c000e4eff/cc286854507a32300a256bd10081a475?OpenDocument>..>Google Scholar

16. Kaiser, Robert, “Uzbek-US Declaration Kept Secret,” Washington Post, 1 July 2001, p. A11.Google Scholar

17. <http://www.nato.int/pfp/sig-cntr.htm>..>Google Scholar

18. For a useful account of Uzbekistan's military cooperation with the United States see Butler, Kenley, “U.S. Military Cooperation with the Central Asian States,” <cns.miis.edu/research/wtc01/uscamil.htm>..>Google Scholar

19. In addition to the ruling People's Democratic Party, there are four psudo-opposition parties that proclaim loyalty to President Karimov, Islam: Adolat (Justice) Social Democratic Party, Democratic National Rebirth Party (Milly Tiklanish), Fatherland Progress Party, and Self-Sacrificers Party or Fidokorlar National Democratic Party.Google Scholar

20. See, for example, statement by Acacia Shields from Human Rights Watch to the U.S. Congressional Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights, 7 September 2000, <http://www.house.gov/international_relations/hr/irfOOshi.htm>..>Google Scholar

21. Brzezinski, Zbigniew, “A Geostrategy for Eurasia,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 5, 1997, pp. 50–65; Starr, Fredrick S., “Making Eurasia Stable,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 75, No. 1, 1996, pp. 80–92.Google Scholar

22. “Uzbekistan, USA Sign Documents on Emergency Situations,” Uzbekistan Daily Digest, 1 February 2001, <http://www.eurasianet.org/resource/uzbekistan/hypermail/200102/0000.html>..>Google Scholar

23. “Uzbek President Meets US State Department Delegation,” Uzbekistan Daily Digest, 24 April 2001, <http://www.eurasianet.org/resource/uzbekistan/hypermail/200104/0034.html>..>Google Scholar

24. “Uzbek Human Rights violations due to Instability, Transition—Rights Chief,” Uzbekistan Daily Digest, 18 April 2001, <http://www.eurasianet.org/resource/uzbekistan/hypermail/200104/0028.html>; the actual U.N. document may be found on the official UNHCR site: <www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/NewsRoom?OpenFrameSet>.;+the+actual+U.N.+document+may+be+found+on+the+official+UNHCR+site:+.>Google Scholar

25. “Uzbek Delegation Discusses Human Rights Issues with EU,” RFE/RL NewsLine, 24 January 2001, <www.rferl.org/newsline/2001/01/240101.asp>; <www.eurasianet.org/resource/uzbekistan/hypermail/200101/0026.html>.;+.>Google Scholar

26. Kaiser, Robert, “US Ties Inspire Uzbek Reform Promises,” Washington Post, 1 July 2002, p. All.Google Scholar

27. Human Rights Watch, World Report 2002: Uzbekistan, 22 May 2002, <www.hrw.org/wr2k2/europe22.html>..>Google Scholar

28. “Uzbekistan: Dissident in Psychiatric Detention Soviet-Era Tactic Revived in Campaign against Human Rights Activists,” Uzbekistan Daily Digest, 12 April 2001, <www.eurasianet.org/resource/uzbekistan/hypermail/200104/0023.html>..>Google Scholar

29. President Karimov's address was broadcast on Uzbek television first channel on 22 January 2000. See “Uzbek president addresses parliament,” Uzbekistan Daily Digest, 24 January 2000, <www.EuasiaNet.org>..>Google Scholar

30. Hurriyat, 10 March 2000, p. 2.Google Scholar

31. Narodnoye Slovo, 27 February 2002, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

32. “Uzbekistan Moves toward Abolishing Press Censorship,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 10 May 2002.Google Scholar

33. Uzbek National News Agency, 3 July 2002, <www.uza.uz>..>Google Scholar

34. “International Committee Calls on Uzbekistan to Stop Media Restriction,” Uzbekistan Daily Digest, 21 June 2002, <www.eurasianet.org/resource/uzbekistan/hypermail/news/0010.shtml>..>Google Scholar

35. “Continued Absence of Media Freedom in Uzbekistan Criticized,” Uzbekistan Daily Digest, 21 June 2002, <www.eurasianet.org/resource/uzbekistan/hypermail/news/0007.shtml>..>Google Scholar

36. For a penetrating critique of the new U.S. agenda in relation to Central Asia see Luong, Pauline Jones and Weinthal, Erika, “New Friends, New Fears in Central Asia,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 2, 2002, pp. 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. See for example Strategic Assessment of Central Asia, p. 100.Google Scholar

38. “Uzbek Head Hails Independence, Urges Vigilance in New Year Message,” Uzbekistan Daily Digest, 2 January 2001, <www.eurasianet.org/resource/uzbekistan/hypermail/200101/0000.html>..>Google Scholar

39. RFE/RL Newsline, 17 April 2000.Google Scholar

40. International Crisis Group, Central Asia, p. vi.Google Scholar