Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T10:44:41.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Vepsians: An Administratively Divided Nationality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Ott Kurs
Ott Kurs*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, University of Tartu, Estonia
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The administrative division of late imperial Russia made few concessions to minority populations, who often found themselves divided among several provinces. The Bolshevik ascendancy to power changed the situation; Vladimir Lenin's “federal compromise” marked a breakthrough from the tsarist unitary practice to a system of governance which, at least on paper, made allowance for the ethnocultural diversity of the population. The chief designers of the Bolshevik nationality policy believed that a federal arrangement would offer a framework for controlling undesirable national sentiments during the transitional stage when class identities would gradually replace ethnic attachments. However, it turned out that for non-Russian groups the national-territorial autonomous units were not simply empty containers, free of cultural and emotional meaning, in which their political socialization would occur. These units became an integral part of their national identity; ethnicity obtained “legal” territorial roots and the various territorial units began to function as vessels of ethnic consciousness.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2001, pp. 69 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Notes

1. Kagedan Allan, “Territorial Units as Nationality Policy,” in Henry R. Huttenbach, ed., Soviet Nationality Policies. Ruling Ethnic Groups in the USSR (London: Mansell, 1990), pp. 163–64.Google Scholar

2. Kagedan, “Territorial Units,” pp. 166–167; Robert J. Kaiser, The Geography of Nationalism in Russia and the USSR (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), p. 105.Google Scholar

3. Kaiser, ibid., pp. 109–110; Yuri Slezkine, “The USSR as a Communal Apartment, or How a Socialist State Promoted Ethnic Particularism,” Slavic Review, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1994, p. 430.Google Scholar

4. A. F. Nuzhnyi, ed., Administrativo-ekonomicheskii spravochnik po Leningradskoi oblasti (Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningradskogo oblispolkoma i Lensoveta, 1936), p. 103.Google Scholar

5. The topic will be discussed on the basis of literature on the Vepsians and my own field-work in the Vepsian uplands (1963 and 1968) and in the northern part of the Vepsian ethnic territory (1976, 1994, and 1995). The results are documented in: Ott Kurs, “Itävepsäläisten vieraana,” Neuvosto-Karjala, 17 November 1968; Ott Kurs, “Vepsa kõrgustikul,” Eesti Loodus, Vol. 17, 1974, pp. 53–56; Ott Kurs, “Vepsamaa,” Kodumaa, 21 August 1974; Ott Kurs, “Vepsä ja vepsäläiset,” Maapallo, No. 4, 1981, pp. 115–124; Ott Kurs, “Indigenous Finnic Population of NW Russia,” GeoJournal, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1994, pp. 447–456; Ott Kurs, “Käynti Petroskoissa ja Äänisen Vepsässä,” Inkeri, No. 6, 1994, p. 6; Ott Kurs, “Venemaa läänemeresoome rahvaste haridus- ja haldusasutused,” Kleio. Ajaloo ajakiri, No. 2, 1995, pp. 27–31, 63-64; Ott Kurs, “Vepsäläiset: itäisin itämerensuomalainen kansa,” Terra, Vol. 107, No. 3, 1995, pp. 127–135.Google Scholar

6. In Russian medieval chronicles Zavoloch'e is the designation for areas northeast of Lake Onega and White Lake and north of the Sukhona River.Google Scholar

7. In Russian Vepsovskaia vozvyshennost'.Google Scholar

8. Tiit-Rein Viitso, “Äänisvepslastest ja nende keelest,” Saaremaast Sajaanideni ja kaugemalegi (Tallinn: Valgus, 1970), pp. 126–136.Google Scholar

9. V. V. Sedov, “Etnicheskii sostav naseleniia Novgorodskoi zemli,” Finno-ugry i slaviane (Leningrad: Nauka, 1979), pp. 74–80.Google Scholar

10. D. V. Bubrikh, “Russkoe gosudarstvo i sformirovanie karel'skogo naroda,” Pribaltiisko-finskoe iazykoznanie, Vol. 5 (Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1971), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar

11. Branch, Michael, A. J. Sjögren. Studies of the North. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran toimituksia, Vol. 152 (Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 1973), pp. 83–92.Google Scholar

12. A. H. Snellmann, Itämeren suomalaiset itsenäisyyden aikana (Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, 1894), p. 47.Google Scholar

13. Ian M. Matley, “Demographic Trends and Assimilation Among the Finnic-Speaking Peoples of North-Western Russia,” Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, Vol. 48, 1976, pp. 167–85.Google Scholar

14. Presumably, this extension was connected also with certain strategic considerations. At any rate, Russian settlement was strengthened in the areas neighboring the wharves located along the route from the Petrozavodsk gun factory to St Petersburg.Google Scholar

15. In 1897, the northern Vepsians showed a literacy rate of 18%, while among other Vepsian groups the rate was around 10%. See, Pimenov and Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsy: rasselenie, istoriia,” p. 17.Google Scholar

16. See, for example, Elias Lönnrot, Matkat 1828–1844 (Espoo: Weilin+Göös, 1980), pp. 386–87.Google Scholar

17. About S. A. Makar'ev's life and activities see: Iu. A. Savvateev, “Stepan Andreevich Makar'ev,” Vepsy: istoriia, kul'tura i mezhetnicheskie kontakty. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov (Petrozavodsk: Izd-vo Petrozavodskogo universiteta, 1999), pp. 10–41.Google Scholar

18. S. Makarjev, Vepsäläiset. Lyhyt kansatieteellinen kuvaus (Leningrad: Kirja, 1931), 39 pp.Google Scholar

19. E. Kanervo, “Vepsäläiset,” Iso tietosanakirja, Vol. 15 (Helsinki: Otava, 1939), pp. 237–38.Google Scholar

20. M. Mullonen, “Vepsskaia pis'mennost',” Pribaltiisko-finskoe iazykoznanie, Vol. 4 (Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1967), pp. 105–09; Zinaida Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsä-läisten uudellensyntyminen on alkanut,” Carelia, No. 5, 1993, p. 135.Google Scholar

21. Pimenov, Vladimir and Zinaida Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsäläisten etnisen kehityksen ongelmia,” in ed. Kaija Heikkinen and Irma Mullonen, Vepsäläiset tutuiksi. Karjalan tutkimuslaitoksen julkaisuja, No. 108, (Joensuu: University of Joensuu, 1994), pp. 32–33.Google Scholar

22. Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsäläisten uudellensyntyminen,” p. 136.Google Scholar

23. V. V. Pimenov and Z. I. Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsy: rasselenie, istoriia, problemy etnich-eskogo razvitiia,” in Problemy istorii i kul'tury vepsskoi narodnosti (Petrozavodsk: Karel'skii filial AN SSSR, 1989), p. 21.Google Scholar

24. Ibid., p. 21.Google Scholar

25. Gelb, Michael, “The Western Finnic Minorities and the Origins of the Stalinist Nationalities Deportations,” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1996, p. 256.Google Scholar

26. See, for example, V. V. Abramov, “Iussi Rainio i Vepsskii krai,” Vepsy: istoriia, kul'tura i mezhetnicheskie kontakty. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov (Petrozavodsk: Izd-vo Petrozavodskogo universiteta, 1999), pp. 52–58.Google Scholar

27. Lallukka, Seppo, The East Finnic Minorities in the Soviet Union. An Appraisal of Erosive Trends. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Ser. B, Vol. 252 (Helsinki: Suomalainen tiedeakatemia, 1990), pp. 143–44.Google Scholar

28. Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsäläisten uudelleensyntyminen,” p. 137.Google Scholar

29. Pimenov and Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsy: rasselenie, istoriia,” p. 22.Google Scholar

30. Petuhov, Anatoli, “Vepsän heimon kovat kohtalot,” Carelia, No. 7, 1994, pp. 64–73, 81-84.Google Scholar

31. Pimenov and Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsäläisten etnisen kehityksen ongelmia,” pp. 19–20.Google Scholar

32. Kurs, “Vepsä ja vepsäläiset,” pp. 121–24.Google Scholar

33. Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsäläisten uudelleensyntyminen,” p. 138.Google Scholar

34. Pimenov and Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsy: rasselenie, istoriia,” p. 22.Google Scholar

35. Vsesoiuznaia perepis' naseleniia 1926 goda, Vol. 17 (Moscow: Izdanie TsSU SSSR, 1929), table 6; Itogi Vsesoiuznoi perepisi naseleniia 1970 goda, Vol. 4 (Moscow: Statistika, 1973), table 1; Chislennost' i sostav naseleniia SSSR. Po dannym Vsesoiuznoi perepisi naseleniia 1979 goda (Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 1984), table 13; Vsesoiuznaia perepis' naseleniia 1939 goda. Osnovnye itogi (Moscow: Nauka, 1992), table 15.Google Scholar

36. Petuhov, Anatoli, “Vepsän jälkeläiset,” in ed. Mauno Jokipii, Itämerensuomalaiset. Heimokansojen historiaa ja kohtaloita (Jyväskylä: Atena, 1995), p. 397.Google Scholar

37. Pimenov and Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsy: rasselenie, istoriia,” p. 21; Z. I. Strogal'shchikova, “Ob etnodemograficheskikh tendentsiiakh, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskom i kul'turnom razvitii vepsskoi narodnosti,” in Problemy istorii i kul'tury vepsskoi narodnosti (Petrozavodsk: Karel'skii filial AN SSSR, 1989), p. 29.Google Scholar

38. Strogal'shchikova, “Ob etnodemograficheskikh tendentsiiakh,” pp. 29, 32.Google Scholar

39. Pimenov and Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsy: rasselenie, istoriia,” p. 23; Strogal'shchikova, “Ob etnodemograficheskikh tendentsiiakh,” pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

40. Petuhov, Anatoli, “Pienen kansan maallinen vaellus,” Punalippu, No. 2, 1989, pp. 99–109.Google Scholar

41. Mark D'iachkov, “Vepsy uchat vepsskii iazyk,” Kodima, No. 12, 1994.Google Scholar

42. Klementjev, Jevgeni, “Karjalan kansallisten vähemmistöjen kohtalo vaa'ankielessä,” Carelia, No. 7, 1993, pp. 128–38.Google Scholar

43. Honko, Lauri, Timonen, Senni and Branch, Michael, The Great Bear: A Thematic Anthology of Oral Poetry in the Finno-Ugrian Languages (Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 1993), p. 35.Google Scholar

44. Heikkinen, Kaija, “Mahtuvatko vepsäläiset kansalaisyhteiskuntaan,” Kahden Karjalan välillä. Kahden Riikin riitamaalla (Joensuu: University of Joensuu, 1994), pp. 279–89.Google Scholar

45. Strogal'shchikova, “Vepsäläisten uudelleensyntyminen,” p. 141.Google Scholar

46. D'iachkov, “Vepsy uchat vepsskii iazyk.”Google Scholar

47. Taagepera, Rein, The Finno-Ugric Republic and the Russian State (London: Hurst, 1999), p. 137.Google Scholar

48. Mezhetnicheskie otnosheniia i konflikty v postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh. Ezhegodnyi doklad, 1999 (Moscow: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN, 2000), p. 53.Google Scholar

49. Three in Karelia (Rybreka, Sheltozero and Shoksha), nine in Leningrad province (Kurba, Ozera, Iaroslavichi and Vinnitsy in Podporozh'e district; Podporog and Khmelozero in Lodeinoe Pole district; Alekseevo in Tikhvin district; Sidorovo and Radogoshchi in Boksitogorsk district) and three in Vologda province (Kuia and Piazhozero in Babaievo district; Oshta in Vytegra district).Google Scholar

50. Problemy ekonomicheskogo i sotsial'nogo razvitiia vepsskoi narodnosti Karel'skoi ASSR, Leningradskoi i Vologodskoi oblastei (Otdel ekonomiki Karel'skogo filiala AN SSR, Nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut ekonomiki i organizatsii sel'skokhoziastvennogo proizvodstva Nechernozemnoi zony RSFSR, Leningradskii gosudarstvennyi universitet nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut geografii, 1989, unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar

51. Kurs, “Indigenous Finnic Population,” p. 449.Google Scholar

52. Kurs, Ott, “Baltic Finnic and Sami ethnic areas in North-West Russia,” Estonia. Geographical Studies (Tallinn: Estonian Academy Publishers, 1996, p. 197.Google Scholar

53. Ibid., pp. 193–197.Google Scholar

54. Zinaida Strogal'shchikova, “Dorogu osilit idushchii …,” Kodima, No. 8, 1996.Google Scholar