Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T08:56:41.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing for linguistic injustice: territoriality and pluralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Helder De Schutter
Helder De Schutter*
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
*
∗ Email: helder.deschutter@hiw.kuleuven.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This article develops a linguistic injustice test. Language policy measures passing the test conflict with the normative ideal of equal language recognition. The first part of the test checks for external restrictions - language policies that grant more recognition to one language group than to another. The second part of the test checks for internal restrictions - language policies that grant more recognition to some members of a language group than to other members of the same group. The article then applies the linguistic injustice test to two models of linguistic justice: linguistic territoriality and linguistic pluralism. It is argued that real-life cases of linguistic territoriality tend to pass the test. It is argued that instantiations of linguistic pluralism tend to fail the test.

Keywords

linguistic justicelinguistic territoriality principlelanguage policylinguistic nationalismVan Parijs

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 42 , Issue 6 , November 2014, pp. 1034 - 1052
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

References

Boran, Idil. 2003. “Global Linguistic Diversity, Public Goods, and the Principle of Fairness.” In Language Rights and Political Theory, edited by Kymlicka, Will and Patten, Alan, 189–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brio. 2013. “Brio-taalbarometer(s): taalkennis en taalgebruik in Brussel.” www.briobrussel.be Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph. 2000. Culture, Citizenship and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulombe, Pierre. 1995. Language Rights in French Canada. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grin, François. 2003. “Diversity as Paradigm, Analytical Device, and Policy Goal.” In Language Rights and Political Theory, edited by Kymlicka, Will and Patten, Alan, 169–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grin, François. 2011. “Using Territoriality to Support Genuine Linguistic Diversity, not to Get Rid of It.” In The Linguistic Territoriality Principle: Right Violation or Parity of Esteem? Re-Bel E-book 11, edited by De Grauwe, Paul and Van Parijs, Philippe, 28–33. Brussels: University Foundation.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2001a. Politics in the Vernacular. Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2001b. “Territorial Boundaries: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective.” In Boundaries and Justice. Diverse Ethical Perspectives, edited by Miller, David and Hashmi, Sohail H., 249–275. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean. 1984. Langue et Territoire. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean. 2001. “Politics and the Law of Babel.” Social Science Information 40 (2): 179–194.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob. 2000. The Multiculturalism of Fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1986. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan. 2001. “Political Theory and Language Policy.” Political Theory 29 (5): 683–707.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan. 2003. “What Kind of Bilingualism?” In Language Rights and Political Theory, edited by Kymlicka, Will and Patten, Alan, 296–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan. 2014. Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan, and Kymlicka, Will. 2003. “Introduction: Language Rights and Political Theory: Context, Issues and Approaches.” In Language Rights and Political Theory, edited by Kymlicka, Will and Patten, Alan, 1–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Réaume, Denise. 2003. “Beyond Personality: The Territorial and Personal Principles of Language Policy Reconsidered.” In Language Rights and Political Theory, edited by Kymlicka, Will and Patten, Alan, 271–295. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Réaume, Denise. Forthcoming. “Lingua Franca Fever: Skeptical Remarks.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.Google Scholar
Réaume, Denise, and Green, Leslie. 1991. “Bilingualism, Territorialism, and Linguistic Justice.” The Network: Newsletter of the Network on the Constitution 1 (3): 9–11.Google Scholar
Stojanovic, Nenad. 2010. “Une conception dynamique du principe de territorialité linguistique. La loi sur les langues du canton des Grisons.” Politique et Sociétés 29 (1): 231–259.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe. 2000. “The Ground Floor of the World. On the Socio-Economic Consequences of Linguistic Globalisation.” International Political Science Review 21 (2): 217–233.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philppe. 2008. “Linguistic Justice for Europe, Belgium and the World.” In Lectures for the XXIst Century, edited by Raymaekers, Bart, 13–36. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe. 2011. Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Velaers, Jan. 2011. “On Territoriality, Linguistic Borders and the Protection of Minorities.” In The Linguistic Territoriality Principle: Right Violation or Parity of Esteem? Re-Bel E-book 11, edited by De Grauwe, Paul and Van Parijs, Philippe, 48–51. Brussels: University Foundation.Google Scholar