Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T03:56:34.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to the special issue on evaluating word sense disambiguation systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2003

PHILIP EDMONDS
Affiliation:
Sharp Laboratories of Europe, Oxford Science Park, Oxford OX4 4GB, UK e-mail: phil@sharp.co.uk
ADAM KILGARRIFF
Affiliation:
Information Technology Research Institute, University of Brighton, Lewes Road, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK e-mail: Adam.Kilgarriff@itri.brighton.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Has system performance on Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) reached a limit? Automatic systems don't perform nearly as well as humans on the task, and from the results of the SENSEVAL exercises, recent improvements in system performance appear negligible or even negative. Still, systems do perform much better than the baselines, so something is being done right. System evaluation is crucial to explain these results and to show the way forward. Indeed, the success of any project in WSD is tied to the evaluation methodology used, and especially to the formalization of the task that the systems perform. The evaluation of WSD has turned out to be as difficult as designing the systems in the first place.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2002 Cambridge University Press