^{page 86 note 1} Grant, R. M., Gnosticism, a Sourcebook of Heretical Writings from the Early Christian Period (New York, 1961), p. 70; see also the editio princeps of W. Till, Die gnostischen Schriften des koptischen Papyrus Berolinensis 8502 (Texte und Untersuchungen, vol. LX), (Berlin, 1955), p. 85.Google Scholar

^{page 86 note 2} Puech, H. Ch., ‘Gnostische Evangelien und verwandte Dokumente’, in E. Hennecke-W. Schneemelcher, Neutestamentliche Apokryphen³ (Tübingen, 1959), pp. 235f.Google Scholar

^{page 86 note 3} Grant, R. M., in loc., p. 85 (the text of Puech, loc. cit. p. 241, from another codex is slightly different).Google Scholar

^{page 87 note 1} Bousset, W., Die Offenbarung Johannis⁶ (Göttingen, 1906)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Swete, H. B., The Apocalypse of St John (London, 1906)Google Scholar; Charles, R. H., The Revelation of St John (Edinburgh, 1920)Google Scholar; Lohmeyer, E., Die Offenbarung des Johannes² (Tübingen, 1953), all in loc. (this exegesis is already found in the ‘Annotationes’ of Hugo Grotius in the middle of the seventeenth century).Google Scholar

^{page 87 note 2} Moffatt, J., ‘The Revelation of St John the Divine’, The Expositor's Greek Testament, vol. v (London, 1910), in loc.Google Scholar

^{page 88 note 1} Windisch, H., Der Barnabasbrief (Tübingen, 1920), p. 307 (he gives the texts of Theophilus, Irenaeus, Ps.-Clem. ii, 6, Hippolytus [Blessing of Jacob], Philo and the papyrus which will be quoted in the following pages).Google Scholar

^{page 89 note 1} Cf. also Hom. ii, 10, 1, εί προφήτης έστìν καì δύναται είδέναι ώς έγένετο ό κόσμος καì τ⋯ έν αύτ γινόμενα καì τ⋯ είς τέλος έσόμενα άν ήμīν τι προειρηκώς ε⋯ς τέλος έγνώκαμεν γεγενημένον, καλς αύτ έκτν ήδη γεγενημένων κα⋯ τά έσόμενα ἔσεσθαι πιστεύομεν ού μόνον ώς γινώσκοντι, άλλά και προγινώσκαντι.

^{page 90 note 1} Dibelius, M., Der Hirt des Hermas (Tübingen, 1923), pp. 1538 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 90 note 2} See the note of Heinemann, I., Philo von Alexandria, die Werke in deutscher Übersetzung (Breslau, 1910), 11, p. 103, n. 2.Google Scholar

^{page 90 note 3} Windisch only gives an abstract; the text from Kenyon, Greek Papyri, was reprinted in a more extensive form in Reitzenstein, R., Die hellenistischen Mysterienreligionen³ (Leipzig, 1927), p. 239.Google Scholar

^{page 91 note 1} Weinreich, O., ‘Aion in Eleusis’, Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, xix (1918), 178 ff., has collected some Greek texts, but does not mention the Latin texts, except for Ps.-Apuleius, nor the ‘prophetic aspect in Greek literature’. Some of the new material I owe to the assistance of my collaborator for the ‘Corpus Hellenisticum’, Mr G. Mussies, litt. hum. dr.Google Scholar

^{page 91 note 2} Almquist, H., Plutarch und das Neue Testament (Uppsala, 1946), p. 138.Google Scholar

^{page 91 note 3} Cf. also Lucretius, De rerum natura, 460–1, about ‘time’ as an abstraction:

… transactum quid sit in aevo

turn quae res instet: quod porro deinde sequatur.

^{page 92 note 1} The use of Homer and Hesiod in the teaching of the schools is well known; see also the remark of Hanfmann, G. M. A., ‘Muses’, in Oxford Classical Dictionary (Oxford, 1949), p. 583: ‘Throughout antiquity the prevailing conception of the Muses follows Hesiod.’Google Scholar

^{page 92 note 2} Cf. Nilsson, M. P., ‘Orphic Literature’, in Oxford Classical Dictionary, p. 627: ‘a number of Hymns to various gods, probably composed in Asia Minor in the Roman age.’Google Scholar

^{page 92 note 3} Weinreich, O., loc. cit. p. 178.Google Scholar

^{page 93 note 1} Published by Buresch, K., Klaros, Untersuchungen zum Orakelwesen des späteren Altertums (Leipzig, 1889), p. 100.Google Scholar

^{page 94 note 1} van Unnik, W. C., ‘De la règle Μήτε προσθεīναι μήτε άφελεἴν dans l'histoire du Canon’, in Vigiliae Christianae, iii (1949), 1 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 94 note 2} See e.g. Lohmeyer, , loc. cit. pp. 7, 201.Google Scholar

^{page 94 note 3} Liechtenhahn, R., Die Offenbarung im Gnosticismus (Göttingen, 1901), pp. 5ff.Google Scholar

^{page 94 note 4} See my ‘Second Report on the Corpus Hellenisticum’, New Testament Studies, iii (1956–1957), 254 ff.Google Scholar