^{page 77 note 1} It may be mentioned here that the Geneva version includes a conjectural emendation in the margin at Mark, xvi. 2Google Scholar; opposite the difficult statement that the women ‘came vnto the sepulchre, when the sunne was yet rising’, the margin reads ‘Or, not risen’. (This variant is not mentioned in the list given above because it is introduced, not by the siglum of two parallel lines, but by ‘Or’ as though it were like other alternative renderings, and because it is not printed in the large type characteristic of the alternative readings.) Undoubtedly its presence is due to Beza's proposal that, since one manuscript known of his reads έτι άνατείλαντος. perhaps we should read ούκ έτι άνατείλαντς, according to Luke, xxiv. 1 and John, xx. 1, the women arrive before the sun had risen.Google Scholar

^{page 77 note 2} More precisely, the 1611 version had one comment of this kind; in the margin opposite Luke, xvii. 36Google Scholar (cf. number 1 in the list above) is the note, ‘Thu verse 36. is wanting in most of the Greek copies’. It may also be mentioned that the Bishops' Bible printed the second half of I John, ii. 23 in small type and within square brackets, but with no comment in the margin. In the 1611 version these words were printed in Roman type, which, it will be recollected, served as our italics in a book otherwise printed in black-letter type. There is no doubt that these words belong to the text of I John; it is only in the later Greek text that they have fallen out owing to homoeoteleuton.Google Scholar

^{page 77 note 3} (This paper was read at the annual meeting of S.N.T.S. held at Aarhus in August 1960.—Ed.)

^{page 78 note 1} Walter, C. Till, Die Gnostischen Schriften des koptischen Papyrus Berolinensis 8502 (T. und U. 60), (1955). Hereafter cited as BG.Google Scholar

^{page 78 note 2} Pahor, Labib, Coptic Gnostic Papyri in the Coptic Museum at Old Cairo, vol. 1 (Cairo, 1956). Hereafter cited as CGPI.Google Scholar

^{page 78 note 3} Henri, Charles Puech, ‘The Jung Codex and the other Gnostic Documents from Nag Hammadi’, p. 22Google Scholar of The Jung Codex, transl. and ed. by Frank, L. Cross (London, 1955).Google Scholar

^{page 78 note 4} So Robert, McL. Wilson, ‘Gnostic Origins’, Vig. Chr. IX, 207. The references to Quispel and Till are from this article.Google Scholar