Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T08:14:02.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Verb Second—Predication or Unification?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Robin Cooper
Robin Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Lund University, Helgonabacken 12, S-223 62, Lund, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

This paper reports work in progress. It concerns the relationship in Germanic languages between the sentence initial constituent XP, and the rest of the sentence S, assuming a rule S → XP S. An informal proposal is presented, according to which that relationship is better characterized in terms of the notion of unification than that of predication. The author is currently working with Elisabet Engdahl on producing a precise grammar of some long distance dependency constructions which should be able to embody the ideas sketched here.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1986, pp. 163 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Barwise, J. ' Cooper, R. (in preparation), Linguistic and Logical Aspects of Situation Semantics.Google Scholar
Barwise, J. ' Perry, J. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. 1983. Quantification and Syntactic Theory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. 1984. Sentence Negation in Situation Semantics. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (forthcoming). Preliminaries to the Treatment of Generalized Quantifiers in Situation Semantics. In Gärdenfors, P. (ed.) Generalized Quantifiers. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. ' Engdahl, E. (in preparation). Situation Semantics for Long Distance Dependencies.Google Scholar
Engdahl, E. 1983. Recent Approaches to wh-Constructions. Paper presented at the Second Workshop on Scandinavian Syntax, Biskops-Arnö.Google Scholar
Engdahl, E. 1986. Constituent Questions. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. 1983. The Finite Sentence in English and Swedish, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 3, Trondheim, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Shieber, S. M. 1985. Course Notes on Unification Approaches to Grammar. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. T. (forthcoming). On Verb Second and the Functional Content of Syntactic Categories. In Haider, H. and Prinzhorn, N. (eds.). Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar