Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:25:20.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deciding the future of Uganda's tropical forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2009

Gary M. Tabor,
Andrew D. Johns and
John M. Kasenene
Gary M. Tabor
Affiliation:
African Wildlife Foundation, P.O. Box 48177, Nairobi, Kenya.
Andrew D. Johns
Affiliation:
Makerere University Biological Field Station, P.O. Box 10066, Kampala, Uganda.
John M. Kasenene
Affiliation:
Makerere University Biological Field Station, P.O. Box 10066, Kampala, Uganda.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The FFPS has been involved for some time in conservation activities in the diminishing montane forests of east-central Africa. These montane forests form an upper sector of an even more endangered medium-altitude forest formation. Throughout their distribution, medium-altitude forests have been extensively disturbed by ever-increasing human activities. Extensive areas remain only in eastern Zaire, where there ststus is uncertain, and in Uganda. The Ugandan forests are now the focus of a major internationally financed development programme.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , October 1990, pp. 208 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1990

References

Earl, D.E. 1968. Latest techniques in the treatment of natural high forest in the South Mengo District. Paper presented in Ninth Commonwealth Forestry Conference, India.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A.C. 1974. Distribution patterns of forest trees in Uganda and their historical significance. Vegetation, 29, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A.C. 1984. Deforestation in Uganda. Oxford University Press, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Huart, d' J.P. 1989. Bases for the development of a co-ordinated management of contiguous protected areas in Zaire and Uganda. Unpubl. report to the European Development Fund, Headquarters of the European Community, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
IUCN. 1980. World Conservation Strategy. Ed. IUCN, UNDP and WWF. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
IUCN. 1986. IUCN Directory of Afrotropical Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kasenene, J.M. 1987. The influence of mechanized selective logging, felling intensity and gap-size on the regeneration of a tropical moist forest in the Kibale Forest Reserve, Uganda. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, USA.Google Scholar
Ledec, G. and Goodland, R.J.A. 1987. Wildlands: their Protection and Management in Economic Development. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Leslie, A.J. 1987. A second look at the economics of natural management systems in tropical mixed forests. Unasylva, 155 (39), 46–58.Google Scholar
Plumptre, R.A. and Earl, D.E. 1984. Integrating small industries with management of tropical forest for improved utilization and higher future productivity. Paper presented to IUFRO Meeting on Properties and Utilization of Tropical Timbers, Manaus, Brazil.Google Scholar
Roche, L. 1979. Forestry and the conservation of plants and animals in the tropics. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorupa, J.P. and Kasenene, J.M. 1983. Tropical forest management:can rates of natural treefalls help guide us? Oryx, 18, 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, J. and Dyson, M. 1988. Options for World Bank Intervention to Protect Tropical Rainforests. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, T.T. 1987. Forestry issues and conservation in Uganda. Biol. Cons. 39, 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 1986. The World Bank's Operational Policy on Wildlands: their Protection and Management in Economic Development. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Wyatt-Smith, J. 1987. The management of tropical moist forest for the sustained production of timber. Report to IUCN/IIED/WWF. IIED, London.Google Scholar