Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T20:06:25.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On temperate areas, basal clades and biodiversity conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Juan J. Morrone ,
Liliana Katinas  and
Jorge V. Crisci
Juan J. Morrone
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Sistemática y Biología Evolutiva (LASBE), Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.
Liliana Katinas
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Sistemática y Biología Evolutiva (LASBE), Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.
Jorge V. Crisci
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Sistemática y Biología Evolutiva (LASBE), Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

It has been accepted traditionally that biodiversity is concentrated in the tropics. However, threatened temperate areas in southern South America, South Africa, New Caledonia, Australia and the Holarctic possess a significant number of unique taxa. Phylogenetic information encoded in cladograms can be used to develop indices for measuring biodiversity. Application of these indices to Asteraceae (Angiosperms) and Curculionoidea (Coleoptera) indicates the relevance of the temperate areas to biodiversity conservation: they are rich in phylogenetically valuable species and are environmentally threatened.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 187 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1996

References

Ackery, P.R. and Vane-Wright, R.I. 1984. Milkweed Butterflies: Their Cladistics and Biology. British Museum (Natural History), London, and Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Atkinson, I. 1989. Introduced animals and extinctions. In Conservation for the Twenty-First Century (eds Western, D. and Pearl, M.), pp. 54–69. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Barnard, J.L. 1991. Amphidological agreement with Platnick. J. Nat. Hist. 25, 1675–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, K. 1994. Asteraceae: Cladistics and Classification. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
Eggleton, P. 1994. Termites live in a pear-shaped world: a response to Platnick. J. Nat. Hist. 28, 1209–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.J. and Vane-Wright, R.I. 1994. Systematics and Conservation Evaluation. The Systematics Association Special Volume 50, Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuschel, G. 1989. The Nearctic Nemonychidae (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Ent. Scand. 20, 121–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuschel, G. 1994. Nemonychidae of Australia, New Guinea and New Caledonia. In Australian Weevils, Vol. 1. (ed. Zimmerman, E. C.), pp. 563–637. CSIRO, Canberra.Google Scholar
Myers, N. 1988. Threatened biotas: ‘hotspots’ in tropical forests. Environmentalist, 8 (3), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platnick, N.I. 1991. Patterns of biodiversity: tropical versus temperate. J. Nat. Hist. 25, 1083–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platnick, N.I. 1992. Patterns of biodiversity. In Systematics, Ecology and the Biodiversity Crisis (ed. Eldredge, N.), pp. 15–24. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Reid, J.W. 1994. Latitudinal diversity patterns of continental benthic copepod species assemblages in the Americas. Hydrobiologia, 292/293, 341–349.Google Scholar
Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. 1991. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (ed.) 1988. Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar