Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T07:35:27.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invention by evolution: Functional analysis in paleobiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2019

Roy E. Plotnick and
Tomasz K. Baumiller
Roy E. Plotnick
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor, Chicago, Illinois 60607. E-mail: plotnick@uic.edu
Tomasz K. Baumiller
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences and Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079. E-mail: tomaszB@umich.edu
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Functional analysis of fossils is and should remain a key component of paleobiological research. Despite recently expressed doubts, conceptual and methodological developments over the past 25 years indicate that robust and testable claims about function can be produced. Functional statements can be made in at least three different hierarchical contexts, corresponding to the degree of structural information available, the position in the phylogenetic hierarchy, and the degree of anatomical specificity. The paradigm approach, which dominated thinking about function in the 1960s and 1970s, has been supplanted with a methodology based on biomechanics. Paleobiomechanics does not assume optimality in organismal design, but determines whether structures were capable of carrying out a given function. The paradigm approach can best be viewed as a way of generating, rather than testing, functional hypotheses. Hypotheses about function can also be developed and supported by well-corroborated phylogenetic arguments. Additional functional evidence can be derived from studies of trace fossils and of taphonomy. New computer techniques, including “Artificial Life” studies, have the potential for producing far more detailed ideas about function and mode of life than have been previously possible. Functional analysis remains the basis for studies of the history of adaptation. It is also an essential component of many paleoecological and paleoenvironmental studies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 26 , Issue S4: Deep Time: Paleobiology's Perspective , 2000, pp. 305 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Alexander, R. M. 1989. Mechanics of fossil vertebrates. Journal of the Geological Society, London 146:41–52.Google Scholar
Allen, T. F. H., and Hoekstra, T. W. 1992. Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1983. Ecospace utilization and guilds in marine communities through the Phanerozoic. Pp. 719–746 in Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L., eds. Biotic interactions in fossil and Recent benthic communities. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1994. Seafood through time: changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology 19:372–397.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1990. Physical modeling of the batocrinid anal tube: functional analysis and multiple hypothesis-testing. Lethaia 23:399–408.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1992. Importance of hydrodynamic lift to crinoid autecology, or, could crinoids function as kites. Journal of Paleontology 66:658–665.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1993. Survivorship analysis of Paleozoic Crinoidea: effect of filter morphology on evolutionary rates. Paleobiology 19:304–321.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., and Ausich, W. I. 1992. The broken-stick model as a null hypothesis for crinoid stalk taphonomy and as a guide to the distribution of connective tissue in fossils. Paleobiology 18:288–298.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., and Hagdorn, H. 1995. Taphonomy as a guide to functional morphology of Holocrinus, the first post-Paleozoic crinoid. Lethaia 28:221–228.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., Llewellyn, G., Messing, C. G., and Ausich, W. I. 1995. Taphonomy of isocrinid stalks: influence of decay and autotomy. Palaios 10:87–95.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K., and Kidwell, S. M. 1985. Taphonomy's contributions to paleobiology. Paleobiology 11:105–119.Google Scholar
Bock, W. J., and Wahlert, G. von. 1965. Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19:269–299.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1990. Evolutionary paleobiology of behavior and coevolution. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Boyajian, G. E., and LaBarbera, M. 1987. Biomechanical analysis of passive flow of stromatoporoids—morphological, paleoecological, and systematic implications. Lethaia 20:223–229.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., Dalingwater, J. E., and Seiden, P. A. 1991. Biomechanics of locomotion in fossil arthropods. Pp. 37–56 in Rayner and Wootton 1991.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G. 1990. Trace fossils. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Coddington, J. A. 1988. Cladistic tests of adaptational hypotheses. Cladistics 2:53–67.Google Scholar
Cowen, R. 1975. ‘Flapping valves’ in brachiopods. Lethaia 8:23–29.Google Scholar
Cowen, R. 1979. Functional morphology. Pp. 487–489 in Fairbridge, R. and Jablonski, D., eds. Encyclopedia of paleontology. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Stroudsburg, Penn.Google Scholar
Daniel, T. L., Helmuth, B. S., Saunders, W. B., and Ward, P. D. 1997. Septal complexity in ammonoid cephalopods increased mechanical risk and limited depth. Paleobiology 23:470–481.Google Scholar
DeMar, R. 1976. Functional morphological models: evolutionary and non-evolutionary. Fieldiana (Geology) 33:333–354.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1998. Brainchildren: essays on designing minds. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Denny, M. 1995. Predicting physical disturbance—mechanistic approaches to the study of survivorship on wave-swept shores. Ecological Monographs 65:371–418.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1979. Cladism and common sense. Pp. 165–198 in Cracraft, J. and Eldredge, N., eds. Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1985. Unfinished synthesis. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. C. 1977. Functional morphology of spines in the Pennsylvanian horseshoe crab Euproops danae. Paleobiology 3:175–195.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. C. 1985. Evolutionary morphology: beyond the analogous, the anecdotal, and the ad hoc. Paleobiology 11:120–138.Google Scholar
Frazetta, T. H. 1975. Complex adaptations in evolving populations. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
Gatesy, S. M., Middleton, K. M., Jenkins, F. A. Jr., and Shubin, N. H. 1999. Three-dimensional preservation of foot movements in Triassic theropod dinosaurs. Nature 399:141–144.Google Scholar
Gershenfeld, N. 1999. The nature of mathematical modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gislén, T. 1938. A revision of the recent Bathycrinidae. Acta Universitatis Lundensis 34:1–30.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1970. Evolutionary paleontology and science of form. Earth Science Reviews 6:77–119.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1980. The promise of paleobiology as a nomothetic, evolutionary discipline. Paleobiology 6:96–118.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205:581–598.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1972. The lophophore and feeding mechanism of the Productidina (Brachiopoda). Journal of Paleontology 46:213–249.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1975. Methods and conclusions in functional analysis: a reply. Lethaia 8:31–34.Google Scholar
Greenewalt, C. J. 1975. The flight of birds. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new series, 65(4):1–67.Google Scholar
Grzeszczuk, R., and Terzopoulos, D. 1995. Automated learning of muscle-actuated locomotion through control abstraction. SIGGRAPH (Conference 1995). Computer graphics proceedings, annual conference series, pp. 63–70. Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics, Association for Computing Machinery, New York.Google Scholar
Hagdorn, H. 1995. Triassic crinoids. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie, Teil 11:1–22.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. 1988. Analysis of form and function in fossils. American Zoologist 28:775–783.Google Scholar
Holland, N. D., Grimmer, J. C., and Wiegmann, K. 1991. The structure of the sea lily Calamocrinus diomedae, with special reference to the articulations, skeletal microstructure, symbiotic bacteria, axial organs, and stalk tissues (Crinoidea, Millericrinida). Zoomorphology 110:115–132.Google Scholar
Huebner, K. H., Thornton, E. A., and Byrom, T. G. 1995. The finite element method for engineers. Wiley-Interscience, New Work.Google Scholar
Jacob, F. 1977. Evolution and tinkering. Science 196:1161–1167.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K. 1996. Chambered cephalopod shells, buoyancy, structure and decoupling: history and red herrings. Palaios 11:610–614.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K., and Landman, N. H. 1993. Nautilus—a poor model for the function and behavior of ammonoids. Lethaia 26:101–111.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K., Landman, N. H. and Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1994. Ammonite shell shape covaries with facies and hydrodynamics: iterative evolution as a response to changes in basinal environment. Geology 22:905–908.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W., Baumiller, T. K., and Ausich, W. I. 1998. Evolutionary significance of differential species longevity in Osagean–Meramecian (Mississippian) crinoid clades. Paleobiology 24:155–176.Google Scholar
Kesel, A. B., Philippi, U., and Nachtigall, W. 1998. Biomechanical aspects of the insect wing: an analysis using the finite element method. Computers in Biology and Medicine 28:423–437.Google Scholar
Knight, G. J. 1996. Making rocks swim. In Repetski, J. E., ed. Sixth North American paleontological convention, Abstracts of papers. Paleontological Society Special Publication 8:214.Google Scholar
Labandeira, C. C. 1997. Insect mouthparts: ascertaining the paleobiology of insect feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:153–193.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M. 1983. Why the wheels won't go. American Naturalist 121:395–408.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M. 1990. Principles of design of fluid transport systems in zoology. Science 249:992–1000.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M., and Boyajian, G. E. 1991. The function of astrorhizae in stromatoporoids—quantitative tests. Paleobiology 17:121–132.Google Scholar
Lauder, G. V. 1990. Functional morphology and systematics: studying functional patterns in an historical context. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:317–340.Google Scholar
Lauder, G. V. 1991. Biomechanics and evolution: integrating physical and historical biology in the study of complex systems. Pp. 1–19 in Rayner and Wootton 1991.Google Scholar
Lauder, G. V. 1995. On the inference of function from structure. Pp. 1–18 in Thomason 1995.Google Scholar
Lauder, G. V. 1996. The argument from design. Pp. 55–91 in Rose and Lauder 1996b.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1978. Adaptation. Scientific American 239:156–169.Google Scholar
McGhee, G. 1998. Theoretical morphology: the concept and its applications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. 1974. A geometric model of reduction and emergence. Pp. 57–63 in Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T., eds. Studies in the philosophy of biology. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Messing, C. G., RoseSmyth, M. C., Mailer, S. R., and Miller, J. E. 1988. Relocation movement in a stalked crinoid (Echinodermata). Bulletin of Marine Science 42:480–487.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., and Macurda, D. B. 1977. Adaptive radiation of comatulid crinoids. Paleobiology 3:74–82.Google Scholar
Moon, B. R. 1999. Testing an inference of function from structure: snake vertebrae do the twist. Journal of Morphology 241:217–225.Google Scholar
Myhrvold, N. P., and Currie, P. J. 1997. Supersonic sauropods? Tail dynamics in the diplodocids. Paleobiology 23:393–409.Google Scholar
Padian, K. 1991. Pterosaurs: were they functional birds or functional bats? Pp. 145–160 in Rayner and Wootton 1991.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1975. A reappraisal of the paradigm method of functional analysis in fossils. Lethaia 8:15–21.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1999. The paradigm method. Pp. 25–28 in Savazzi, E., ed. Functional morphology of the invertebrate skeleton. Wiley, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
Petroski, H. 1985. To engineer is human. St. Martins, New York.Google Scholar
Petroski, H. 1993. The evolution of useful things. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Petroski, H. 1996. Invention by design. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Philippi, U., and Nachtigall, W. 1996. Functional morphology of regular echinoid tests (Echinodermata, Echinoida): a finite element study. Zoomorphology 116:35–50.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. 1985. Lift-based mechanisms for swimming in eurypterids and portunid crabs. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 76:325–337.Google Scholar
Petroski, H. 1997. Wonderful interactions: the Digital Burgess conference. American Paleontologist 5:2–4.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R., and Baumiller, T. 1988. The pterygotid telson as a biological rudder. Lethaia 21:13–27.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. 1998. Bringing fossils to life. WCB/McGraw Hill, Boston.Google Scholar
Radinsky, L. B. 1987. The evolution of vertebrate design. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Raup, D. 1972. Approaches to morphologic analysis. Pp. 28–45 in Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Ray, T. 1994. An evolutionary approach to synthetic biology: Zen and the art of creating life. Artificial Life Journal 1:179–209.Google Scholar
Rayner, J. M. V. 1991. Avian flight evolution and the problem of Archaeopteryx . Pp. 183–212 in Rayner and Wootton 1991.Google Scholar
Rayner, J. M. V., and Wootton, R. J., eds. 1991. Biomechanics in evolution. Society for Experimental Biology Seminar Series 36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rose, M. R., and Lauder, G. V. 1996a. Post-spandrel adaptationism. Pp. 1–8 in Rose and Lauder 1996b.Google Scholar
Rose, M. R., eds. 1996b. Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Roux, M. 1978. Ontogenèse, variabilité et évolution morphofonctionnelle du pédoncule et du calice chez les Millericrinida (Echinodermes, Crinoïdes). Geobios 11:213–241.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1964. The inference of function from structure in fossils. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15:27–40.Google Scholar
Savazzi, E. 1999. Introduction to functional morphology. Pp. 3–14 in Savazzi, E., ed. Functional morphology of the invertebrate skeleton. Wiley, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1964. Biogenic sedimentary structures. Pp. 293–316 in Imbrie, J. and Newell, N. D., eds. Approaches to paleoecology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1970. Arbeitskonzept zur Konstruktions-Morphologie. Lethaia 3:393–396.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A., and LaBarbera, M. 1995. Ammonites as Cartesian divers. Palaios 10:493–506.Google Scholar
Signor, P. 1982. A critical re-evaluation of the paradigm method of constructional inference. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 164:59–63.Google Scholar
Simms, M. J. 1988. The phylogeny of post-Paleozoic crinoids. Pp. 269–284 in Paul, C. R. C. and Smith, A. B., eds. Echinoderm phylogeny and evolutionary biology. Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Simms, M. J. 1999. Systematics, phylogeny and evolutionary history. Pp. 31–40 in Hess, H., Ausich, W. I., Brett, C. E., and Simms, M. J., eds. Fossil crinoids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Simms, M. J., and Sevastopulo, G. D. 1993. The origin of articulate crinoids. Palaeontology 36:91–109.Google Scholar
Sims, K. 1994. Evolving virtual creatures. SIGGRAPH (Conference 1994). Computer graphics proceedings, annual conference series, pp. 15–22. Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics, Association for Computing Machinery, New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1970. Relation of shell form to life habits in the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of America Memoir 125.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. A., and Parrish, J. M. 1999. Neck posture and feeding habits of two Jurassic sauropod dinosaurs. Science 284:798–800.Google Scholar
Terzopoulos, D., Tu, X., and Grzeszczuk, R. 1994. Artificial fishes: autonomous locomotion, perception, behavior, and learning in a simulated physical world. Artificial Life 1:327–351.Google Scholar
Terzopoulos, D., Rabie, T., and Grzeszczuk, R. 1997. Perception and learning in artificial animals. Pp. 1–8 in Langton, C. G. and Shimohara, K., eds. Artificial life V: proceedings of the fifth international workshop on the synthesis and simulation of living systems, Nara-shi, Japan, 1996. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1979. Biological bulldozers and the evolution of marine benthic communities. Science 203:458–461.Google Scholar
Thomason, J., ed. 1995. Functional morphology in vertebrate paleontology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. M., and May, C. M. 1996. Hierarchies in biology and paleontology. Paleobiology 22:23–33.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators, and grazers. Paleobiology 3:245–258.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1996. Adaptations of clades: resistance and response. Pp. 363–380 in Rose and Lauder 1996b.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1994. Life in moving fluids: the physical biology of flow. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1998. Cats’ paws and catapults. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Wainwright, S. 1988. Axis and circumference: the cylindrical shape of plants and animals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wainwright, S., Biggs, W., Currey, J., and Gosline, M. 1976. Mechanical design in organisms. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Watkins, R. 1994. Evolution of Silurian pentamerid communities in Wisconsin. Palaios 9:488–499.Google Scholar
Weishampel, D. B. 1995. Fossils, function, and phylogeny. Pp. 34–54 in Thomason 1995.Google Scholar
Witmer, L. M. 1995. The extant phylogenetic bracket and the importance of reconstructing soft tissues in fossils. Pp. 19–33 in Thomason 1995.Google Scholar
Witmer, L. M., and Rose, K. D. 1991. Biomechanics of the jaw apparatus of the gigantic Eocene bird Diatryma: implications for diet and mode of life. Paleobiology 17:95–120.Google Scholar