Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T05:59:10.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional morphology of Cretaceous helically-coiled ammonite shells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Peter Ward
Peter Ward*
Affiliation:
Geology Department, University of California, Davis, California 95616
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Torticonic (helically-coiled) ammonoids have been most commonly interpreted as vagile, benthonic forms. Their mode of coiling, however, places the siphuncle in a functionally dorsolateral, rather than ventral position on the shell whorl due to: 1) their probable apex-upward shell orientation during life, and 2) size asymmetry of the lateral sutural saddles due to helical coiling, associated with upward siphuncle displacement. The resultant positioning of the siphuncle produces cameral liquid de-coupling soon after initiation of cameral liquid removal (emptying of liquid from a newly formed chamber within the phragmocone). Since in Recent chambered cephalopods cameral liquid de-coupling increases efficiency of vertical migration, a similar mode of life was indicated for the torticonic ammonites.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , Fall 1979, pp. 415 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Bayer, U. 1975. Organische Tapeten im Ammoniten-Phragmokon und ihr Einflub auf die Fossilisation. Neues Jahrb. fur Geol. und Min. (Mon.) 1:12–25.Google Scholar
Berry, E. W. 1928. Cephalopod adaptations—the record and its interpretations. Q. Rev. Biol. (Baltimore). 3:92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beurlen, K. 1928. Die Lebensweise der Ammoniten. Bericht. Senckenberg. Naturf. Gesell. 58:546–556.Google Scholar
Clark, D. L. 1965. Heteromorph ammonoids from the Albian and Cenomanian of Texas and adjacent areas. Geol. Soc. of Am. Mem. 95:1–99.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. R. 1966. A review of the systematics and ecology of oceanic squids. Adv. Mar. Biol. 4:91–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J. and Gilpin-Brown, J. B. 1966. On the buoyancy of the Pearly Nautilus. J. Mar. Biol. Assn. U.K. 46:723–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J. and Gilpin-Brown, J. B. 1973. Flotation mechanisms in modern and fossil cephalopods. Adv. Mar. Biol. 11:197–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, C. 1912. Lebensweise und Verbreitung der Ammoniten. Neues Jahrb., Min. Geol. 2:67–89.Google Scholar
Dietl, G. 1973. Middle Jurassic (Dogger) heteromorph ammonites. Pp. 283–285. In: Hallam, A., ed. Atlas of Paleobiogeography.Google Scholar
Linsley, R. M. 1977. Some “laws” of gastropod shell form. Paleobiology. 3(2):196:206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1973. Late Cretaceous Ammonoidea. Pp. 421–429. In: Hallam, A., ed. Atlas of Paleobiogeography.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1977. Some heteromorph ammonites from the Cretaceous of Hokkaido. Mem. Fac. Sci., Kyushu Univ., Series D. 23(3):303–366.Google Scholar
Raup, D. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: General problems. J. Paleontol. 40:1178–1190.Google Scholar
Raup, D. 1967. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: coiling in ammonoids. J. Paleontol. 41:43–65.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1975. Mechanische Simulation und funktionelle Evolution des Ammoniten-Septums. Paläontol. Z. 49(3):268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trueman, A. E. 1941. The ammonite body chamber, with special reference to the buoyancy and mode of life of the living ammonite. Geol. Soc. London, Q. J. 96:339–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. D. 1976. Upper Cretaceous ammonites (Santonian-Campanian) from Orcas Island, Washington. J. Paleontol. 50(3):454–461.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D. and Martin, A. W. 1978. On the buoyancy of the Pearly Nautilus. J. Exp. Zool. 205(1):5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. D. and Westermann, G. 1977. First occurrence, systematics, and functional morphology of Nipponites (Cretaceous Lytoceratina) from the Americas. J. Paleontol. 51(2):367–372.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1971. Form, structure and function of shell and siphuncle in coiled Mesozoic Ammonoids. Life Sci. Contr., R. Ont. Mus., No. 78, 39 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1973. Upper Triassic heteromorph ammonites. In: Hallam, A., ed. Atlas of Paleobiogeography.Google Scholar