Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:21:12.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Niche conservatism along an onshore-offshore gradient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Steven M. Holland and
Andrew Zaffos
Steven M. Holland
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2501. E-mail: stratum@uga.edu
Andrew Zaffos
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2501. E-mail: stratum@uga.edu
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Niche conservatism is increasingly recognized in diverse modern ecological settings, and it influences many aspects of modern ecosystems, including speciation mechanisms, community structure, and response to climate change. Here, we investigate the stability of niches with benthic marine invertebrates along a Late Ordovician onshore-offshore gradient on the Cincinnati Arch in the eastern United States. Using a Gaussian niche model characterized by peak abundance, preferred environment, and environmental tolerance, with these parameters estimated through weighted averaging and logistic regression, we find evidence of strong niche conservatism in peak abundance and preferred environment, particularly for abundant taxa. This conservatism is maintained in successive depositional sequences and through the nearly 9–10 Myr study interval. Environmental tolerance shows no evidence of conservatism, although numerical simulations suggest that the error rates in estimates of this parameter are so high that they could overwhelm evidence of conservatism. These numerical simulations also indicate that both weighted averaging and logistic regression produce useful estimates of peak abundance and preferred environment, with slightly better results for weighted averaging. This evidence for niche conservatism suggests that long-term shifts of higher taxa of marine invertebrates into deeper water are primarily the result of differential rates of origination and extinction. These results also add to the evidence of long periods of relatively stable ecosystems despite regional environmental perturbations, and they constrain the causes of peaked patterns in occupancy.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , Spring 2011, pp. 270 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Ackerly, D. D. 2004. Adaptation, niche conservatism, and convergence: comparative studies of leaf evolution in the California chaparral. American Naturalist 163:654–671.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Thompson, W. L. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:912–923.Google Scholar
Ando, A., Huber, B. T., and MacLeod, K. G. 2010. Depth-habitat reorganization of planktonic foraminifera across the Albian/Cenomanian boundary. Paleobiology 36:357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottjer, D. J., and Jablonski, D. 1988. Paleoenvironmental patterns in the evolution of post-Paleozoic benthic marine invertebrates. Palaios 3:540–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1981. Principles of benthic marine paleoecology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1983. Does evolution take place in an ecological vacuum? II. Journal of Paleontology 57:1–30.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1998. Sequence stratigraphy, paleoecology, and evolution: biotic clues and responses to sea-level fluctuations. Palaios 13:241–262.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Algeo, T. J. 2001. Event beds and small-scale cycles in Edenian to lower Maysvillian strata (Upper Ordovician) of northern Kentucky: identification, origin, and temporal constraints. Pp. 65–92 in Algeo, T. J. and Brett, C. E., eds. Sequence, cycle and event stratigraphy of Upper Ordovician and Silurian strata of the Cincinnati Arch region. Field trip guidebook, 1999 field conference, Great Lakes Section SEPM-SSG (Society for Sedimentary Geology). Kentucky Geological Survey, Lexington.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Baird, G. C. 1995. Coordinated stasis and evolutionary ecology of Silurian to Middle Devonian faunas in the Appalachian Basin. Pp. 285–315 in Erwin, D. H. and Anstey, R. L., eds. New approaches to speciation in the fossil record. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., Ivany, L. C., and Schopf, K. M. 1996. Coordinated stasis: an overview. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 127:1–20.Google Scholar
Coudun, C., and Gégout, J. C. 2006. The derivation of species response curves with Gaussian logistic regression is sensitive to sampling intensity and curve characteristics. Ecological Modeling 199:164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, M. D., Arroyo, M. T. K., Cook, L. G., Gandolfo, M. A., Jordan, G. J., McGlone, M. S., Weston, P. H., Westoby, M., Wilf, P., and Linder, H. P. 2009. Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature 458:754–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. R. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. J. Murray, London.Google Scholar
Donoghue, M. J. 2008. A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105:11549–11555.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., Thompson, J. N., Brakefield, P. M., Gavrilets, S., Jablonski, D., Jackson, J. B. C., Lenski, R. E., Lieberman, B. S., McPeek, M. A., and Miller, W. III. 2005. The dynamics of evolutionary stasis. In Vrba, E. S. and Eldredge, N., eds. Macroevolution: diversity, disparity, contingency Paleobiology 31(Suppl. to No. 2):133–145.Google Scholar
Foote, M., Crampton, J. S., Beu, A. G., Marshall, B. A., Cooper, R. A., Maxwell, P. A., and Matcham, I. 2007. Rise and fall of species occupancy in Cenozoic fossil mollusks. Science 318:1131–1134.Google Scholar
Hadly, E. A., Spaeth, P. A., and Li, C. 2009. Niche conservatism above the species level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:19707–19714.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1993. Sequence stratigraphy of a carbonate-clastic ramp: the Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician) in its type area. Geological Society of America Bulletin 105:306–322.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1997. Using time/environment analysis to recognize faunal events in the Upper Ordovician of the Cincinnati Arch. Pp. 309–334 in Brett, C. E. and Baird, G. C., eds. Paleontological events: stratigraphic, ecological and evolutionary implications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 2000. The quality of the fossil record: a sequence stratigraphic perspective. Pp. 148–168 in Erwin, D. H. and Wing, S. L., eds. Deep time: Paleobiology's perspective Paleobiology 26(Suppl. to No. 4):148–168.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 2005. The signatures of patches and gradients in ecological ordinations. Palaios 20:573–580.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 1996. Sequence stratigraphy and long-term paleoceanographic change in the Middle and Upper Ordovician of the eastern United States. In Witzke, B. J., Ludvigsen, G. A., and Day, J. E., eds. Paleozoic sequence stratigraphy: views from the North American craton. Geological Society of America Special Paper 306:117–130.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 2004. Ecosystem structure and stability: Middle Upper Ordovician of central Kentucky, USA. Palaios 19:316–331.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 2007. Gradient ecology of a biotic invasion: biofacies of the type Cincinnatian series (Upper Ordovician), Cincinnati, Ohio region, USA. Palaios 22:392–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, S. M., Miller, A. I., Meyer, D. L., and Dattilo, B. F. 2001. The detection and importance of subtle biofacies within a single lithofacies: the Upper Ordovician Kope Formation of the Cincinnati, Ohio region. Palaios 16:205–217.Google Scholar
Hua, X., and Wiens, J. J. 2010. Latitudinal variation in speciation mechanisms in frogs. Evolution 64:429–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quaternary Biology 22:415–427.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1980. Apparent versus real biotic effects of transgressions and regressions. Paleobiology 6:397–407.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 2008. Species selection: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology and Evolutionary Systematics 39:501–524.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Botrjer, D. J. 1988. Onshore-offshore evolutionary patterns in post-Paleozoic echinoderms: a preliminary analysis. Pp. 81–90 in Burke, R. D., Mladenov, P. V., Lambert, P., and Parsley, R. L., eds. Echinoderm biology. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1990. Onshore-offshore trends in marine invertebrate evolution. Pp. 21–75 in Ross, R. M. and Allmon, W. D., eds. Causes of evolution: a paleontologic perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. J., Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., Bottjer, D. J., and Sheehan, P. M. 1983. Onshore-offshore patterns in the evolution of Phanerozoic shelf communities. Science 222:1123–1125.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., Roy, K., and Valentine, J. W. 2006. Out of the tropics: evolutionary dynamics of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Science 314:102–106.Google Scholar
Jennette, D. C., and Pryor, W. A. 1993. Cyclic alternation of proximal and distal storm facies: Kope and Fairview Formations (Upper Ordovician), Ohio and Kentucky. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 63:183–203.Google Scholar
Jongman, R. H. G., Ter Braak, C. J. F., and Van Tongeren, O. F. R., eds. 1995. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., and Flessa, K. W. 1996. The quality of the fossil record: populations, species, and communities. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 24:433–464.Google Scholar
Kozak, K. H., and Wiens, J. J. 2006. Does niche conservatism promote speciation? A case study in North American salamanders. Evolution 60:2604–2621.Google Scholar
Krug, A. Z., Jablonski, D., Valentine, J. W., and Roy, K. 2009. Generation of Earth's first-order biodiversity pattern. Astrobiology 9:113–124.Google Scholar
Liow, L. H., and Stenseth, N. C. 2007. The rise and fall of species: implications for macroevolutionary and macroecological studies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274:2745–2752.Google Scholar
Losos, J. B. 2008. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecology Letters 11:995–1003.Google Scholar
Lovette, I. J., and Hochachka, W. M. 2006. Simultaneous effects of phylogenetic niche conservatism and competition on avian community structure. Ecology 87:S14–S28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maguire, K. C., and Stigall, A. L. 2009. Distribution of fossil horses in the Great Plains during the Miocene and Pliocene: an ecological niche modeling approach. Paleobiology 35:587–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M. L., Lockwood, J. L., and Frederick, D. R. 1996. Does ecosystem and evolutionary stability include rare species? Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 127:191–207.Google Scholar
Mcnyset, K. M. 2009. Ecological niche conservatism in North American freshwater fishes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 96:282–295.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1997. Coordinated stasis or coincident relative stability? Paleobiology 23:155–164.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I., and Connolly, S. R. 2001. Substrate affinities of higher taxa and the Ordovician Radiation. Paleobiology 27:768–778.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I., and Foote, M. 2003. Increased longevities of post-Paleozoic marine genera after mass extinctions. Science 302:1030–1032.Google Scholar
Moen, D. S., Smith, S. A., and Wiens, J. J. 2009. Community assembly through evolutionary diversification and dispersal in Middle American treefrogs. Evolution 63:3228–3247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, P. J., Ivany, L. C., Schopf, K. M., and Brett, C. E. 1995. The challenge of paleoecological stasis: reassessing sources of evolutionary stability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 92:11269–11273.Google Scholar
Nunes, M. F. C., Galetti, M., Marsden, S., Pereira, R. S., and Peterson, A. T. 2007. Are large-scale distributional shifts of the blue-winged macaw (Primolius maracana) related to climate change? Journal of Biogeography 34:816–827.Google Scholar
Olson, E. C. 1952. The evolution of a Permian vertebrate chronofauna. Evolution 6:181–196.Google Scholar
Olszewski, T. D., and Erwin, D. H. 2009. Change and stability in Permian brachiopod communities from western Texas. Palaios 24:27–40.Google Scholar
Olszewski, T. D., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 2001. Evaluating taxonomic turnover: Pennsylvanian–Permian brachiopods and bivalves of the North American midcontinent. Paleobiology 27:646–668.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E., and Holland, S. M. 1993. Biotic response to a Middle Ordovician paleoceanographic event in eastern North America. Geology 21:619–622.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E. 1997. Patterns of turnover in Middle and Upper Ordovician brachiopods of the eastern United States: a test of coordinated stasis. Paleobiology 23:420–443.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E. 2007. Diversity partitioning of a Late Ordovician marine biotic invasion: controls on diversity in regional ecosystems. Paleobiology 33:295–309.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. T., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Soberon, J., Bartley, J., Buddemeier, R. W., and Navarro-Siguenza, A. G. 2001. Effects of global climate change on geographic distributions of Mexican Cracidae. Ecological Modeling 144:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, M. C., and Read, J. F. 1997. High-resolution stratigraphy of the Lexington Limestone (Late Middle Ordovician), Kentucky, United States of America: a cool-water carbonate-clastic ramp in a tectonically active foreland basin. In James, N. P. and Clarke, J. A. D., eds. Cool-water carbonates. SEPM Special Publication 56:411–429. Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Pope, M. C., Holland, S. M., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 2009. The Cincinnati Arch: a stationary peripheral bulge during the Late Ordovician. In Swart, P. K., Eberli, G. P., and McKenzie, J. A., eds. Perspectives in carbonate geology: a tribute to the career of Robert Nathan Ginsburg. International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication 41:255–276.Google Scholar
Roy, K., Jablonski, D., and Valentine, J. W. 1995. Thermally anomalous assemblages revisited: patterns in the extraprovincial latitudinal range shifts of Pleistocene marine mollusks. Geology 23:1071–1074.Google Scholar
Roy, K. 2001. Climate change, species range limits and body size in marine bivalves. Paleobiology 4:366–370.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Version 2.11.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., and Miller, A. I. 1985. Evolutionary faunas and the distribution of Paleozoic benthic communities in space and time. Pp. 153–190 in Valentine, J. W., ed. Phanerozoic diversity patterns. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar
Stephens, P. R., and Wiens, J. J. 2009. Bridging the gap between community ecology and historical biogeography: niche conservatism and community structure in emydid turtles. Molecular Ecology 18:4664–4679.Google Scholar
Rode, A. L. Stigall, and Lieberman, B. S. 2005. Using environmental niche modeling to study the Late Devonian biodiversity crisis. Pp. 93–180 in Over, D. J., Morrow, J. R., and Wignall, P. B., eds. Understanding Late Devonian and Permian-Triassic biotic and climatic events: towards an integrated approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
ter Braak, C. J. F., and Looman, C. W. M. 1986. Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 65:3–11.Google Scholar
Tobin, R. C., and Pryor, W. A. 1981. Sedimentological interpretation of an Upper Ordovician carbonate-shale vertical sequence in northern Kentucky. Pp. 49–57 in Roberts, T. G., ed. GSA Cincinnati '81 Field Trip Guidebooks, Vol. I. Stratigraphy, sedimentology. American Geological Institute, Falls Church, Va. Google Scholar
Vermeesch, P. 2009. Lies, damned lies, and statistics (in geology). Eos 90:443.Google Scholar
Vrba, E. S. 1985. Environment and evolution: alternative causes of the temporal distribution of evolutionary events. South African Journal of Science 81:229–236.Google Scholar
Vrba, E. S. 1993. Turnover-pulses, the Red Queen, and related topics. American Journal of Science 293-A:418–452.Google Scholar
Walker, K. R., and Laporte, L. F. 1970. Congruent fossil communities from Ordovician and Devonian carbonates of New York. Journal of Paleontology 44:928–944.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1970. Communities and ecosystems. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. J. 2008. Commentary on Losos (2008): Niche conservatism deja vu. Ecology Letters 11:1004–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiens, J. J., and Graham, C. H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36:519–539.Google Scholar
Yoccoz, N. G. 1991. Use, overuse, and misuse of significance tests in evolutionary biology and ecology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 72:106–111.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Holland and Zaffos supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Holland and Zaffos supplementary material(File)
File 39.2 KB