Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T11:13:52.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paleozoic Scleractinia: progenitors or extinct experiments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Yoichi Ezaki
Yoichi Ezaki*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585, Japan. E-mail: ezaki@sci.osaka-cu.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Scleractinia, which are one of the most important builders of modern reefs, have been considered to have first appeared in the Middle Triassic. Recently, Paleozoic scleractiniamorphs have been reported from both the Ordovician and the Permian, suggesting that the scleractinian-like body plan was already established in the Paleozoic. Those Paleozoic scleractiniamorphs are considered either unsuccessful skeletonized offshoots (extinct experiments) or Paleozoic progenitors of the post-Paleozoic Scleractinia. Permian scleractiniamorphs are characterized by “ancestral” features and have no specific morphologies that deny scleractinian affinities. Molecular phylogenetics also indicate that extant scleractinians are monophyletic and originated long before their Triassic appearance. A Paleozoic origin for the Scleractinia is supported by morphological and molecular phylogenetic data. On the other hand, there is no positive evidence to show that different groups of scleractinians had separate soft-bodied precursors.

The Paleozoic scleractinians evolved within the framework of their basic body plan, and a direct derivation of the Scleractinia from the Rugosa is not probable. The Anthozoa are characterized by a bilaterally symmetrical body plan, which is traditionally considered to have been derived from other radially symmetrical Cnidaria. The problem of the origin of scleractinian body plan may provide a key for deciphering the early anthozoan radiation within the Bilateria. Other examples of Paleozoic Scleractinia and scleractiniamorphs will be found, probably in shallow-water reefal facies or deeper-water communities, bridging the stratigraphic gaps in occurrence and elucidating the origin of the Scleractinia and their body plan.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , Spring 1998 , pp. 227 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Bengtson, S., Morris, S. Conway, Cooper, B., Jell, P. A., and Runnegar, B. N. 1990. Early Cambrian fossils from South Australia. Memoir of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 9: 1–364.Google Scholar
Bridge, D., Cunningham, C. W., Schierwater, B., DeSalle, R., and Buss, L. W. 1992. Class-level relationships in the phylum Cnidaria: evidence from mitochondrial genome structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 89: 8750–8753.Google Scholar
Bridge, D., Cunningham, C. W., DeSalle, R., and Buss, L. W. 1995. Class-level relationships in the phylum Cnidaria: molecular and morphological evidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 679–689.Google Scholar
Chen, J. Y. and Erdtmann, B. D. 1990. Lower Cambrian fossil Lagerstätte from Chengjiang, Yunnan, China: insights for reconstructing early metazoan life. Pp. 57–76. Simonetta, A. M., Conway, S., Morris The early evolution of Metazoa and the significance of problematic taxa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Chen, C. A., Odorico, D. M., Lohuis, M. Ten, Veron, J. E. N., and Miller, D. J. 1995. Systematic relationships within the Anthozoa (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) using the 5′-end of the 28S rDNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 175–183.Google Scholar
Coates, A. G. and Jackson, J. B. C. 1987. Clonal growth, algal symbiosis, and reef formation in corals. Paleobiology 13: 363–378.Google Scholar
Morris, S. Conway 1993. Ediacaran-like fossils in Cambrian Burgess Shale-type faunas of North America. Palaeontology 36: 593–635.Google Scholar
Cowen, R. 1988. The role of algal symbiosis in reefs through time. Palaios 3: 221–227.Google Scholar
Crimes, T. P. 1992. The record of trace fossils across the Proterozoic-Cambrian boundary. Pp. 177–202. in Lipps, and Signor, 1992.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 1993. The great Paleozoic crisis. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 1995. The end-Permian mass extinction. Pp. 20–34. Scholle, P. A., Peryt, T. M., Ulmer-Scholle, D. S.The Permian of Northern Pangea. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Erwin, D. H. 1996. Understanding biotic recoveries: extinction, survival, and preservation during the end-Permian mass extinction. Pp. 398–418. Jablonski, D., Erwin, D. H., Lipps, J. H.Evolutionary paleobiology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ezaki, Y. 1989. Morphological and phylogenetic characteristics of Late Permian rugose corals in Iran. Memoir of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 8: 275–281.Google Scholar
Ezaki, Y. 1994. Patterns and paleoenvironmental implications of end-Permian extinction of Rugosa in South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 107: 165–177.Google Scholar
Ezaki, Y. 1995a. The development of reefs across the end-Permian extinction. The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan 101: 857–865.Google Scholar
Ezaki, Y. 1995b. Scleractinian-like Permian coral and origin of Scleractinia. Pp. 18–19. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria and Porifera, Madrid. [Abstract.].Google Scholar
Ezaki, Y. 1997. The Permian coral Numidiaphyllum: new insights into anthozoan phylogeny and Triassic scleractinian origins. Palaeontology 40: 1–14.Google Scholar
Flügel, E. 1994. Pangean shelf carbonates: controls and paleoclimatic significance of Permian and Triassic reefs. G. D. Klein >Pangea: paleoclimate, tectonics, and sedimentation during accretion, zenith, and breakup of a supercontinent. Geological Society of America Special Paper 288: 247–266. Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Flügel, H. W. 1976. Numidiaphyllidae—eine neue Familie der Rugosa aus dem Ober-Perm von Süd-Tunis. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 9: 54–64.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. K. and Jenkins, R. J. F. 1994. Moorowipora chamberensis, a coral from the Early Cambrian Moorowie Formation, Flinders Ranges, South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 118: 227–235.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1984. The dawn of animal life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. and Wignall, P. B. 1997. Mass extinctions and their aftermath. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hand, C. 1966. On the evolution of the Actiniaria. W. J. Rees The Cnidaria and their evolution. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 16: 135–146.Google Scholar
Hanson, E. D. 1977. The origin and early evolution of animals. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Conn.Google Scholar
Iljina, T. G. 1984. Historical development of corals. Transactions of the Paleontological Institute, USSR Academy of Sciences 198: 1–184. [In Russian.].Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. J. F. 1992. Functional and ecological aspects of Ediacaran assemblages. Pp. 131–176. in Lipps, and Signor, 1992.Google Scholar
Lipps, J. H. and Signor, P. W. 1992. Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Melnikoval, G. K. and Roniewicz, E. 1976. Contribution to the systematics and phylogeny of Amphiastraeina (Scleractinia). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 21: 97–114.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr. 1980. The relationship of the scleractinian corals to the rugose corals. Paleobiology 6: 146–160.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr. 1996. Origins and relationships of Paleozoic coral groups and the origin of the Scleractinia. G. D. Stanley Paleobiology and biology of corals. Paleontological Society Paper 1: 107–134. Pittsburgh, Penn.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr. and Coates, A. G. 1987. Phylum Cnidaria. Pp. 140–193. Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., Rowell, A. J.Fossil invertebrates. Blackwell Scientific, Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
Romano, S. L. and Palumbi, S. R. 1996. Evolution of scleractinian corals inferred from molecular systematics. Science 271: 640–642.Google Scholar
Roniewicz, E. and Morycowa, E. 1993. Evolution of the Scleractinia in the light of microstructural data. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 164: 233–240.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu and Zhuravlev, A. Yu 1992. The Lower Cambrian fossil record of the Soviet Union. Pp. 205–282. in Lipps and Signor 1992.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B. 1995. Vendobionta or Metazoa? Developments in understanding the Ediacara “fauna”. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 195: 303–318.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H. 1942. Zur Kenntnis der Polycoelien und Plerophyllen. Eine Studie über den Bau der “Tetrakorallen” und ihre Beziehungen zu den Madreporarien. Abhandlungen des Reichsamts für Bodenforschung, Neue Folge 204: 1–324.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1993. New Kilbuchophyllid corals from the Ordovician of the Southern Uplands, Scotland. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 164: 153–158.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1997. The Palaeozoic corals, I: origins and relationships. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 51: 177–208.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. and Clarkson, E. N. K. 1991. A new scleractinian-like coral from the Ordovician of the Southern Uplands, Scotland. Palaeontology 34: 179–194.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. M. 1985. Reefs are not so different—they follow the evolutionary pattern of level-bottom communities. Geology 13: 46–49.Google Scholar
Sorauf, J. E. and Savarese, M. 1995. A Lower Cambrian coral from South Australia. Palaeontology 38: 757–770.Google Scholar
Stolarski, J. 1996. Gardineria—a scleractinian living fossil. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 41: 339–367.Google Scholar
Veron, J. E. N., Odorica, D. M., Chen, C. A., and Miller, D. J. 1996. Reassessing evolutionary relationships of scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 15: 1–9.Google Scholar
Wainright, P. O., Hinkle, G., Sogin, M. L., and Stickel, S. K. 1993. Monophyletic origins of the Metazoa: an evolutionary link with Fungi. Science 260: 340–342.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W. 1956. Scleractinia. Pp. F328–F444. Bayer, F. M. et al. Coelenterata, R. C. Moore Part F of Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, New York.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W. and Hill, D. 1956. Anthozoa—general features. Pp. F161–F165. Bayer, F. M. et al. Coelenterata, R. C. Moore Part F of Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, New York.Google Scholar
Wendt, J. 1990. The first aragonitic rugose coral. Journal of Paleontology 64: 335–340.Google Scholar
Wood, R. 1993. Nutrients, predation and the history of reef-building. Palaios 8: 526–543.Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu and Wood, R. 1995. Lower Cambrian reefal cryptic communities. Palaeontology 38: 443–470.Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu, Debrenne, F., and Lafuste, J. 1993. Early Cambrian microstructural diversification of Cnidaria. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 164: 365–372.Google Scholar