Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T16:06:09.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shape, Drag, and Power in Ammonoid Swimming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

David K. Jacobs
David K. Jacobs*
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study assesses swimming potential in a variety of ammonoid shell shapes on the basis of coefficients of drag (Cd) and the power needed to maintain a constant velocity. Reynolds numbers (Re) relevant to swimming ammonoids, and lower than those previously studied, were examined. Power consumption was scaled to a range of sizes and swimming velocities. Estimates of power available derived from studies of oxygen consumption in modern cephalopods and fish were used to calculate maximum sustainable swimming velocities (MSV).

Laterally compressed, small thickness ratio (t. r.) ammonoids, previously assumed to be the most efficient swimmers, do not experience the lowest drag or power consumption at all sizes and velocities. At low values of size and velocity associated with Reynolds numbers below 104, less compressed forms have smaller drag coefficients and reduced power requirements. At hatching a roughly spherical shell shape would have minimized drag in ammonoids; with increasing size, hydrodynamic optima shift toward compressed morphologies.

The high energetic cost of ammonoid locomotion may have limited dispersal and excluded ammonoids from high current velocity environments.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , March 1992, pp. 203 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Arkell, W. J. 1957. Introduction to Mesozoic ammonoidea. Pp. 89–129In Moore, R. C., ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, part L. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Batt, R. J. 1989. Ammonite shell morphospace distribution in the Western Interior Greenhorn Sea and some paleoecological implications. Palaios 4: 32–43.Google Scholar
Bayer, U., and McGhee, G. R. Jr. 1984. Iterative evolution of Middle Jurassic ammonite faunas. Lethaia 17: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthold, T., and Engeser, T.. 1987. Phylogenetic analysis and systematization of the Cephalopoda. Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 29: 187–220.Google Scholar
Brett, J. R. 1965. The relation of size to rate of oxygen consumption and sustained swimming speed of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 22: 1491–1501.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1976. Flow patterns and drag coefficients of cephalopod shells. Palæontology 19: 539–563.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1980. The role of body extension in cephalopod locomotion. Palæontology 23: 445–461.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1981. Hydromechanical design of fossil cephalopods. Pp. 289–336In House, M. R. and Senior, J. R., eds. The Ammonoidea. Systematics Association, London.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1990. Jet propulsion of Nautilus: a surviving example of early Paleozoic locomotor design. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 806–814.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr., and Westermann, G.E.G.. 1976. Hydrodynamic properties of cephalopod shell ornament. Paleobiology 2: 316–331.Google Scholar
Daniel, T. L. 1984. Unsteady aspects of aquatic locomotion. American Zoologist 24: 121–134.Google Scholar
Draper, N., and Smith, H.. 1981. Applied regression analysis, 2d ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Ebel, K. 1990. Swimming abilities of ammonites and limitations. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 64: 25–37.Google Scholar
Hoerner, S. F. 1965. Fluid dynamic drag. Published by the author, Brick Town, N.J.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1889. Genesis of the Arietidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge 673: xi–239.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K. 1990. Hydrodynamic and structural constraints on ammonite shell shape. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. K., and Landman, N. H.. 1991. Is Nautilus a good model for the function and behavior of ammonoids? Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 23: 163.Google Scholar
Kummel, B., and Lloyd, R. M.. 1955. Experiments on the relative streamlining of coiled cephalopod shells. Journal of Paleontology 29: 159–170.Google Scholar
Landman, N. H. 1988. Early ontogeny of Mesozoic ammonites and nautilids. Pp. 215–228In Weidman, J. and Kullman, J., eds. Cephalopods present and past. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Mutvei, H., and Reyment, R. A.. 1973. Buoyancy control and siphuncle function in ammonoids. Palæontology 16: 623–636.Google Scholar
O'Dor, R. K. 1982. Respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of the squid, Loligo opalescens. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 39: 580–587.Google Scholar
O'Dor, R. K. 1988. The energetic limits on squid distributions. Malacologia 29: 113–119.Google Scholar
O'Dor, R. K., and Wells, M. J.. 1990. Performance limits of “antique” and “state-of-the-art” cephalopods, Nautilus and squid. American Malacological Union Programs with Abstracts 56: 52.Google Scholar
Peters, R. H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. Journal of Paleontology 40: 1178–1190.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1967. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: coiling in ammonoids. Journal of Paleontology 41: 43–65.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1967. Equations for the volume and center of gravity in ammonoid shells. Journal of Paleontology 41: 566–574.Google Scholar
Redmond, J. R. 1987. Respiratory physiology. Pp. 305–310In Saunders, W. B. and Landman, N. H., eds. Nautilus, the biology and paleobiology of a living fossil. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B., and Shapiro, E. A.. 1986. Calculation and simulation of ammonoid hydrostatics. Paleobiology 12: 64–79.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. 1930. Uber die Bewegungsweise der Schalence-phalopoden. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 12: 194–208.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Neilson, K. 1972. Locomotion: energy cost of swimming, flying and running. Science (Washington, D.C.) 177: 222–228.Google Scholar
Scott, G. 1940. Paleoecological factors controlling the distribution and mode of life of Cretaceous ammonoids in the Texas area. Journal of Paleontology 14: 299–323.Google Scholar
Smith, J. P. 1897. The development of Glyphioceras and the phylogeny of the Glyphioceratidae. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science 1: 105–128.Google Scholar
Smith, J. P. 1898. The development of Lytoceras and Phylloceras. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science 1: 129–152.Google Scholar
Smith, J. P. 1900. The development and phylogeny of Placenticeras. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science 3: 181–232.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1919. Notes on ammonites. Geological Magazine 56: 26–58, 65–74, 115–122, 170–177, 220–225.Google Scholar
Trueman, A. E. 1941. The ammonite body chamber, with special reference to the buoyancy and mode of life of the living ammonite. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 96: 339–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschudy, D. M. 1989. Cephalopods: biasing agents and the preservation of lobsters. Journal of Paleontology 63: 621–626.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1981. Life in moving fluids: the physical biology of flow. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Vogel, S., and LaBarbera, M.. 1978. Simple flow tanks for research and teaching. Bioscience 28: 638–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. 1980. Comparative shell shape distributions in Jurassic-Cretaceous ammonites and Jurassic-Tertiary nautilids. Paleobiology 6: 32–43.Google Scholar
Webber, D. M., and O'Dor, R. K.. 1986. Monitoring the metabolic rate and activity of free-swimming squid with telemetered jet pressure. Journal of Experimental Biology 126: 205–224.Google Scholar
Wells, M. J. 1987. Ventilation and oxygen extraction by Nautilus. Pp. 339–348In Saunders, W. B. and Landman, N. H., eds. Nautilus, the biology and paleobiology of a living fossil. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Westermann, G.E.G. 1971. Form, structure and function of shell and siphuncle in coiled Mesozoic ammonoids. Life Science Contributions Royal Ontario Museum 78: 1–39.Google Scholar