Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:05:02.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amplification of the cestode surface: a stereological analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

L. T. Threadgold and
A. Robinson
L. T. Threadgold
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN
A. Robinson
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A stereological study was undertaken on the length, diameter and numbers of microtriches and on the structural and functional amplification factors of the adult cestodes, Hymenolepis diminuta, Hymenolepis nana, Eubothrium crassium, Proteocephalus pollanicoli, the plerocercoid of Schistocephalus solidus and the cysticercus of Taenia crassiceps. The study showed wide variations in these stereological parameters between species, stages and regionally in the same species. A comparison of the present results with previous studies has shown a large measure of agreement but some differences are evident and possible explanations of these differences are proposed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , December 1984, pp. 523 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baron, P. J. (1971). On the histology, histochemistry and ultrastructure of the cysticercoid of Raellietina cesticullus (Malin 1958) Fuhrmann 1920 (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). Parasitology 62, 233–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beguin, F. (1966). Étude du microscope électronique de la cuticle et de ses structures Associées chez quelques Cestodes: Essai d'histologie Comparée. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie 72, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. & Mettrick, D. F. (1971). Microtrichial polymorphism among Hymenolepid tapeworms as seen by scanning electron microscopy. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 90, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bortoletti, G. & Ferretti, G. (1971). Observations on the ultrastructure of the tegument of the larval forms of Hydatigera (= Taenia) taeniaeformis and considerations on the development of cyclophyllidean cestode larvae. Revista di Parassitologia 32, 249–71.Google Scholar
Braten, T. (1968). The fine structure of the tegument of Diphyllobothrium latum (L). A comparison of the plerocercoid and adult stages. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 30, 104–12.Google Scholar
Collin, W. K. (1970). Electron microscopy of postembryonic stages of the tapeworm Hymenolepis citelli (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). Journal of Parasitology 56, 1159–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeber, K. & Storch, V. (1979). Elektronenmikroskopische und morphometrische Untersuchungen am Integument von Cestoda und Trematoda (Plathelminthes). Zoologischer Anzeiger 202, 331–47.Google Scholar
Haygunga, E. G. & Machiewicz, J. S. (1975). An electron microscope study of the tegument of Hunterella nodulosa Machiewicz & McRae 1962 (Cestodea; Caryophyllidea). International Journal for Parasitology 5, 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, R. D. (1966). Cytological studies on the absorptive surface of cestodes. I. Fine structure of the strobilar tegument. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 27, 355–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, R. D. (1982). The morphology, histology and fine structure of the adult stage of the cyclophyllidean tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta. In The Biology of the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta (ed. Aria, H. P.), pp. 157–280. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rifkin, E., Cheng, T. C. & Hohl, H. R. (1970). The fine structure of the tegument of Tylocephalum metacestode: with emphasis on a new type of microvilli. Journal of Morphology 130, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, A. H. (1963). Electron microscopic studies of tapeworms: The surface structure of Hymenolepis diminuta (Rudolphi, 1819), Blanchard 1891. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 82, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Threadgold, L. T. (1962). Electron microscope study of the tegument and associated structures of Diphylidium caninum. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 103, 135–40.Google Scholar
Threadgold, L. T. (1965). Electron microscope study of the tegument and associated structures of Proteocephalus pollanicoli. Parasitology 55, 467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Threadgold, L. T. & Dunn, J. (1982). Taenia crassiceps: Regional variation in ultrastructure and evidence of endocytosis in the cysticercus tegument. Experimental Parasitology 55, 121–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubelaker, J. E., Allison, V. F. & Specian, R. D. (1973). Surface topography of Hymenolepis diminuta by scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Parasitology 59, 667–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed