Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T17:05:41.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interference in general immune function by parasite infections; African trypanosomiasis as a model system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2011

B. A. Askonas
B. A. Askonas
Affiliation:
National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW1 1AA
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Many parasitic diseases are accompanied by an immunosuppression which may affect only parasite-specific responses in some infections or lead to a general dysfunction of the immune system in others. African trypanosomiasis causes a particularly severe disorder of the immune system and this serves as a model system for analysis of the cellular basis of a parasite-induced general immune dysfunction affecting nearly all T- or B-lymphoid cell subpopulations. The nature of the parasite products causing havoc in the immune system may well vary in different infections and still remains to be defined. Trypanosome membrane fractions are active in vitro or in vivo but we have no evidence for a direct action on B- or T-cells. In vitro, both in man and mouse, T-cells are stimulated, but only in the presence of accessory cells. This points to the importance of host-derived immunosuppressive factors in the immune dysfunction. We have evidence that macrophages, after uptake of parasites in the presence of antibodies, are at least one target cell for parasite action. They can mediate immunosuppression and undergo changes in phenotype and mediator release during the course of infection. The macrophages show all the characteristic signs of activation, which can also be induced by other means and other infective agents such as BCG. Thus, macrophage activation would provide a common pathway for induction of a general immunosuppression in different infections.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 88 , Issue 4: Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology Volume 21: Parasite evasion of the immune response , August 1984, pp. 633 - 638
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bancroft, R. G. & Askonas, B. A. (1982). Regulation of antibody production in protozoal infections. Clinics in Immunology and Allergy 2, 511–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, C. E., Ogilvie, B. M. & Askonas, B. A. (1979). Trypanosoma brucei infection in nude mice: B-lymphocyte function is suppressed in the absence of T-lymphocytes. Parasite Immunology 1, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, C. E., Selkirk, M. E., Corsini, A. C., Ogilvie, B. M. & Askonas, B. A. (1980). Murine trypanosomiasis: cellular proliferation and functional depletion in the blood, peritoneum and spleen related to changes in bone marrow stem cells. Infection and Immunity 28, 824–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corsini, A. C., Clayton, C. E., Askonas, B. A. & Ogilvie, B. M. (1977). Suppressor cells and loss of B-cell potential in mice infected with Trypanosoma brucei. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 29, 122–31Google ScholarPubMed
Fierer, J., Salmon, J. A. & Askonas, B. A. (1984). African trypanosomiasis alters prostaglandin production by murine peritoneal macrophages. Clinical and Experimental Immunology (in the Press).Google Scholar
Greenwood, B. M. (1974a). Immunosuppression in malaria and trypanosomiasis. In Parasites in the Immunized Host: Mechanisms of Survival (ed. Porter, R. and Knight, J.), pp. 137–45. Ciba Foundation Symposium 25 (New Series). Amsterdam: Associated Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Greenwood, B. M. (1974b). Possible role of B-cell mitogen in hypergammaglobulinaemia in malaria and trypanosomiasis. Lancet i, 435–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosskinsky, C. M. & Askonas, B. A. (1981). Macrophages as primary target cells and mediators of immune dysfunction in African trypanosomiasis. Infection and Immunity 33, 149–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosskinsky, C. M., Ezekowitz, R. A. B., Berton, G., Gordon, S. & Askonas, B. A. (1983). Macrophage activation in bovine African trypanosomiasis. Infection and Immunity 39, 1080–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, J. G. (1984). Manipulation of the immune response in parasitic infections. In Parasite Evasion of the Immune Response. Parasitology 88 (4), 665–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Howard, J. G., Hale, C. & Liew, F. W. (1980). Immunological regulation of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. Journal of Experimental Medicine 152, 594–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, K. M. & Terry, R. J. (1979). Immunodepression and the course of infection of a chronic Trypanosoma brucei infection in mice. Parasite Immunology 1, 317–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayawardena, A. N., Waksman, B. H. & Eardley, D. D. (1978). Activation of distinct helper and suppressor T cells in experimental trypanosomiasis. Journal of Immunology 121, 622–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansfield, J. M. (1978). Immunobiology of African trypanosomiasis. Cellular Immunology 39, 204–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansfield, J. M. (1982). Immunology and immunopathology of African trypanosomiasis. In Parasitic Diseases, vol. 1. The Immunology (ed. Mansfield, J. M.), p. 167. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Mansfield, J. M., Levine, R. F., Dempsey, W. L., Wellhausen, S. R. & Hansen, C. T. (1981). Lymphocyte function in experimental African trypanosomiasis. IV. Immunosuppression and suppressor cells in the athymic nu/nu mouse Cellular Immunology 63, 210–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, G. F. (1979). Response to infection with metazoan and protozoan parasites. Advances in Immunology 28, 451–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nathan, C. F., Murray, H. W. & Cohn, Z. A. (1980). The macrophage as an effector cell. New England Journal of Medicine 303, 622–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelants, G. E., Pearson, T. W., Morrison, W. I., Mayor-Withey, K. S. & Lundin, L. B. (1979). Immune depression in trypanosome-infected mice. IV. Kinetics of suppression and alleviation by the trypanocidal drug Berenil. Clinial and Experimental Immunology 37, 457–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Sacks, D. L. & Askonas, B. A. (1980). Trypanosome-induced suppression of antiparasite responses during experimental African trypanosomiasis. European Journal of Immunology 10, 971–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacks, D. L., Selkirk, M., Ogilvie, B. M. & Askonas, B. A. (1980). Intrinsic immunosuppressive activity of different trypanosome strains varies with parasite virulence. Nature, London 283, 476–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacks, D. L., Bancroft, G., Evans, W. H. & Askonas, B. A. (1982). Incubation of trypanosome-derived mitogenic and immunosuppressive products with peritoneal macrophages allows recovery of biological activities from soluble parasite fractions. Infection and Immunity 36, 160–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selkirk, M. E., Ogilvie, B. M. & Platts-Mills, T. A. E. (1981). Activation of human peripheral blood lymphocytes by a trypanosome derived mitogen. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 45, 615–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Unanue, E. R. (1981). The regulatory role of macrophages in antigenic stimulation. II. Symbiotic relationship between lymphocytes and macrophages. Advances in Immunology 31, 1–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed