Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T21:19:41.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Rickettsia1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Edward Hindle
Edward Hindle
Affiliation:
Professor of Biology, School of Medicine, Cairo. (From the Quick Laboratory, Cambridge, and the Biological Dept., School of Medicine, Cairo.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the recent advances in our knowledge of the aetiology of human diseases, one of the most interesting is the discovery of a new group of somewhat problematic organisms which have been grouped together under the generic name Rickettsia. Up to now their presence has been shown, more or less satisfactorily, to be associated with three types of human fevers, viz. typhus, trench fever and possibly Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and in the last few years a certain number of papers have appeared on this subject, the most comprehensive of which are those published by the British War Office Committee and the American Commission on trench fever. In addition it has been suggested that many other human diseases are caused by these organisms, but the evidence is so very unsatisfactory that it may be disregarded.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1921 , pp. 152 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

American Red Cross Medical Research Committee. Report of Commission on Trench Fever (1918), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arkwright, J. A., Bacot, A. and Duncan, F. M. (1919). The Association of Rickettsia with Trench Fever. Journ. of Hygiene, xviii. 76–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumpt, E. (1918). Au sujet d'un parasite (Rickettsia Prowazeki) des poux de l'homme considéré, à tort, comme l'agent causal du typhus exanthématique. Bull. Soc. Path. Exotique, ix. 249.Google Scholar
Buchneŕ, P. (1912). Studien an intracellulären Symbionten. Arch. f. Protistenkunde, xxvi. 1–116.Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B. and Porter, A. (1916). The Significance of certain Natural Flagellates of Insects in the Evolution of Disease in Vertebrates. Journ. Parasitology, ii. 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laveran, A. and Franchini, G. (1914). Infections de Mammifères par des flagellés d'invertébrés. Bull. Soc. Path. Exotique, vii. 605–612.Google Scholar
Nicolle, C., Blanc, G. and Conseil, E. (1914). Quelques points de l'étude expérimentale du Typhus exanthématique. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. clix.Google Scholar
Nöller, W. (1917). Blut- und Insekten-flagellaten Züchtung auf Platten. Archiv f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hygiene, xxi. 53–94.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (1917). The Biology of Pediculus humanus. Parasitology, x. 80–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Rocha, Lima (1916). Zur Aetiologie des Fleckfiebers. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr. liii. 527.Google Scholar
Da Rocha, Lima (1917). Ergebnis der aetiologischen Untersuchungen und deren Beziehungen zur Fleckfieber-forschung. Münch, med. Wochenschr. 1422.Google Scholar
Sikora, H. (1918). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Rickettsien. Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropen- Hygiene, xxii. 442–446.Google Scholar
Töpfer, H. (1916). Zur Aetiologie des Febris Wolhynica. Berlin, klin. Wochenschr. 323.Google Scholar
Wolbach, S. Burt (1919). Studies on Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Journ. Medical Research, xli. 1–197.Google Scholar
Wolbach, S. B., Todd, J. L. and Palfrey, F. W. (1920). Notes on Typhus. Internat. Journ. of Public Health, i. 211–215.Google Scholar