Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T01:08:27.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models and Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

R. I. G. Hughes
R. I. G. Hughes*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
*
†Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2 2AE, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A general account of modeling in physics is proposed. Modeling is shown to involve three components: denotation, demonstration, and interpretation. Elements of the physical world are denoted by elements of the model; the model possesses an internal dynamic that allows us to demonstrate theoretical conclusions; these in turn need to be interpreted if we are to make predictions. The DDI account can be readily extended in ways that correspond to different aspects of scientific practice.

Information

Type
Symposium: Models as Mediators
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 64 , Issue S4: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Dec., 1997 , 1997 , pp. S325 - S336
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baird, D. (1994), “Meaning in a Material Medium”, in D. Hull, M. Forbes, and R. M. Burian (eds.), PSA 1994, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 441–451.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.2.192956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198247044.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhem, P. ([1906] 1991), The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. P. P. Wiener, trans. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Galileo, G. ([1638] 1974), Two New Sciences. S. Drake, trans. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Giere, R. (1985), “Constructive Realism”, in Churchland, P. and Hooker, C. (eds.), Images of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 75–98.Google Scholar
Giere, R. (1988), Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226292038.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, N. (1968), Languages of Art. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
Hertz, H. ([1894] 1956), The Principles of Mechanics. R.S. Cohen, trans. New York: Dover Books.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1953), The Philosophy of Science: An Introduction. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar