Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T05:11:31.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reply to Jones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Daniel Steel
Daniel Steel*
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Reply
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , December 1998, pp. 682 - 687
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, 1017 Cathedral of Learning, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh 15260.

References

Davidson, Donald (1980), Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Earman, John (1986), A Primer on Determinism. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Todd (1998), “Unification, Deduction, and History: A Reply to Steel”, Philosophy of Science, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1989), “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World”, in W. Salmon and P. Kitcher (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XIII. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 410–605.Google Scholar
Steel, Daniel (1998), “Warfare and Western Manufactures: a Case Study of Explanation in Anthropology”, Philosophy of Science, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar