Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T11:29:36.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choosing Between Confirmation Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

R. G. Swinburne
R. G. Swinburne*
Affiliation:
University of Hull
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper considers on what grounds we ought to choose between competing confirmation theories. It begins by distinguishing between confirmation theories and other theories which might be confused with them, such as theories of acceptability. It then argues that the task of a confirmation theory is to analyze rather than explicate our ordinary standards of confirmation, to “draw out” from our intuitive judgments the standards implicit in them. A theory of confirmation will do this in so far as it is coherent and does not yield counter-intuitive judgments.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 1970, pp. 602 - 613
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1] Barker, S. F., Induction and Hypothesis, Ithaca N.Y., 1957.Google Scholar
[2] Bar-Hillel, Y., “Further Comments on Probability and Confirmation: A Reply to Professor Popper,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7, 1956, pp. 245–248.10.1093/bjps/VII.27.245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bunge, M. (ed.), The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
[4] Carnap, R., The Logical Foundations of Probability, 2nd edit., London, 1962.Google Scholar
[5] Carnap, R., The Continuum of Inductive Methods, Chicago, 1952.Google Scholar
[6] Hanna, J. F., “An Explication of ‘explication’,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 35, 1968, pp. 28–44.10.1086/288185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Hempel, C. G., “Studies in the Logic of Confirmation,” republished in Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
[8] Popper, K. R., Conjectures and Refutations, 2nd edit., London, 1965.Google Scholar