Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T17:35:55.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cladistic Classification and Functional Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

P. E. Griffiths
P. E. Griffiths*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy University of Otago
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I adopt a cladistic view of species, and explore the possibility that there exists an equally valuable cladistic view of organismic traits. This suggestion seems to run counter to the stress on functional views of biological traits in recent work in philosophy and psychology. I show how the tension between these two views can be defused with a multilevel view of biological explanation. Despite the attractions of this compromise, I conclude that we must reject it, and adopt an essentially cladistic conception of biological traits.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 206 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

In preparing this paper I have benefited greatly from the comments of Robert J. O'Hara, Russell Gray and an anonymous referee for this journal.

References

Basolo, A. L. (1990), “Female Preference Predates the Evolution of the Sword in Sword-Tailed Fish”, Science 250: 808–810.10.1126/science.250.4982.808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coddington, J. A. (1988), “Cladistic Tests of Adaptational Hypotheses”, Cladistics 4: 3–22.10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00465.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cracraft, J. (1983), “Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis”, in Johnson, R. (ed.), Current Ornithology, vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 159–187.10.1007/978-1-4615-6781-3_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1987), “Species Concepts and the Ontology of Evolution”, Biology and Philosophy 2: 329–346.10.1007/BF00128837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craw, R. (1992), “Margins of Cladistics: Identity, Space and Difference in the Emergence of Phylogenetic Systematics 1864–1975”, in Griffiths, P. (ed.), Trees of Life: Essays in Philosophy of Biology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 65–107.10.1007/978-94-015-8038-0_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. ([1859] 1964), On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. (1972), “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism”, in Schopf, T. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Co., pp. 82–115.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1985), “Phylogenies and the Comparative Method”, American Naturalist 125: 1–15.10.1086/284325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, W. L. (1979), “Optimal Classifications”, Systematic Zoology 28: 371–374.10.2307/2412590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, D. P. and Hillis, D. M. (1990), “Species in Concept and Practice: Herpetological Applications”, Herpetologica 46: 87–104.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974a), “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem”, Systematic Zoology 23: 536–544.10.2307/2412471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974b), The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (1991), “Signal, Decision, Action”, Journal of Philosophy 88: 709–722.10.2307/2027008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1976), “Grades and Clades Revisited”, in Masterton, R. B., Hodos, W., and Jerison, H. (eds.), Evolution, Brain and Behaviour: Persistent Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1985), The Flamingo's Smile: Reflections in Natural History. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1989), Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. London: Century Hutchison.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. (1979), “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205: 581–598.Google Scholar
Gray, R. A. (1987), “Faith and Foraging: A Critique of the ‘Paradigm Argument from Design’” in A. Kamil, J. Krebs, and H. Putnam (eds.), Foraging Behaviour. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 69–140.10.1007/978-1-4613-1839-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, R. D. (1991), “Behaviour, Brain and Phylogeny: Cladistic Analyses of Behavioural, Morphological and Molecular Data”, International Journal of Neuroscience 57: 296.Google Scholar
Gray, R. D. and Craig, J. L. (1991), “Theory Really Matters: Hidden Assumptions in the Concept of Habitat Requirements”, Acta Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici 20: 2553–2560.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1966), Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1976), “Are Species Really Individuals?”, Systematic Zoology 25: 174–191.10.2307/2412744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1978), “A Matter of Individuality”, Philosophy of Science 45: 335–360.10.1086/288811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1984), “Historical Entities and Historical Narratives”, in Hookway, C. (ed.), Minds, Machines and Evolution. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1987), “Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles”, Biology and Philosophy 2: 168–184.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1988), Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pettit, P. (1988), “Functionalism and Broad Content”, Mind 97: 381–400.10.1093/mind/XCVII.387.381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1981), “Natural Categories and Natural Concepts”, The Behavioural and Brain Sciences 4: 293–294.10.1017/S0140525X00008955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitts, D. B. and Kitts, D. J. (1979), “Biological Species as Natural Kinds”, Philosophy of Science 46: 613–622.10.1086/288898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. (1980), Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levins, R. and Lewontin, R. (1980), “Dialectics and Reductions in Ecology”, Synthese 43: 47–78.10.1007/BF00413856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1978), “Adaption”, in Evolution. New York: Scientific American, Inc., pp. 115–125.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1936), The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, C. (1989), New Zealand Journal of Zoology Panbiogeography Special Issue. New Zealand: DSIR Publishing.Google Scholar
Maynard-Smith, J. (1964), “Group Selection and Kin Selection”, Nature 201: 1145–1147.10.1038/2011145a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard-Smith, J. (1982), Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511806292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, N. (1989), Biology and Emotion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511608445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. (1984), Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. (1986), “Thought Without Laws, Cognitive Science with Content”, Philosophical Review 95: 47–80.10.2307/2185132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, B. D. and Brandon, R. (1987), “Individuality, Pluralism and the Phylogenetic Species Concept”, Biology and Philosophy 2: 397–414.10.1007/BF00127698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, B. D. and Donoghue, M. J. (1982), “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism”, Systematic Zoology 31: 491–503.10.2307/2413371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, E. (1982), The Aquatic Ape. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Neander, K. (1991), “The Teleological Notion of ‘Function’”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 454–468.10.1080/00048409112344881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. (1979), “Cladistics Analysis and Synthesis: Principles and Definitions, with a Historical Note on Adanson's Familles des Plantes (1763–1764)”, Systematic Zoology 28: 1–21.10.2307/2412995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. J. and Platnick, N. I. (1981), Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
O'Hara, R. J. (1988), “Homage to Clio, or Towards an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology”, Systematic Zoology 37: 142–155.10.2307/2992272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, C. (1977), “The Contribution of Paleontology to Telostean Phylogeny”, in Hecht, M., Goody, P., and Hecht, B. (eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 579–643.10.1007/978-1-4684-8851-7_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutchik, R. (1970), “Emotions, Evolution and Adaptative Processes”, in Arnold, M. B. (ed.), Feelings and Emotions. New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–24.10.1016/B978-0-12-063550-4.50007-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutchik, R. (1980), “A General Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion”, in R. Plutchik and H. Kellerman (eds.), Emotion: Theory, Research and Experience. Vol. 1, Theories of Emotion. New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975), “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’”, in Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–271.10.1017/CBO9780511625251.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, M. (1989), “The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem”, Biology and Philosophy 4: 1–16.10.1007/BF00144036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, D. E. (1978), “Vicariant Patterns and Historical Explanations in Biogeography”, Systematic Zoology 27: 159–188.10.2307/2412970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, D. E. (1979), “Fishes from the Uplands and Intermontane Basin of Guatemala: Revisionary Studies and Comparative Geography”, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 162: 267–376.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. E. (1982), “Telostean Interrelationships, Morphological Function and Evolutionary Inference”, American Zoologist 22: 261–273.10.1093/icb/22.2.261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. (1980a), “A Succession of Paradigms in Ecology: Essentialism to Materialism and Probabilism”, Synthese 43: 3–39.10.1007/BF00413854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. (1980b), “Reply”, Synthese 43: 79–93.10.1007/BF00413857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1987), “What is Adaptationism?”, in Dupré, J. (ed.), The Latest on the Best? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 105–118.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1988), “The Conceptual Relationship of Cladistic Phylogenetics and Vicariance Biogeography”, Systematic Zoology 37: 245–253.10.2307/2992371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. (1990), The Representational Theory of Mind: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. J. (1987), “Historical versus Selectionist Explanations in Evolutionary Biology”, Cladistics 3: 1–13.10.1111/j.1096-0031.1987.tb00493.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornhill, R. and Thornhill, N. W. (1992), “The Evolutionary Psychology of Men's Coercive Sexuality”, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 15: 363–421.10.1017/S0140525X00069120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valen, T. (1976), “Ecological Species, Multispecies and Oaks”, Taxon 25: 233–239.10.2307/1219444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, J. D. (1977), “Human Sociobiology: Pair Bonding and Resource Predictability”, Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 2: 91–118.10.1007/BF00361896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, E. O. (1978), “The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered”, Systematic Zoology 27: 17–26.10.2307/2412809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, E. O. (1980), “Is the Evolutionary Species a Fiction? A Consideration of Cases, Individuals and Historical Entities”, Systematic Zoology 29: 76–80.10.2307/2412628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, E. O. (1981), Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Young, J. Z. (1962), The Life of Vertebrates. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5962/bhl.title.6856CrossRefGoogle Scholar