Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T02:57:05.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dialectical Materialism: A Friendly Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Hans Freistadt
Hans Freistadt*
Affiliation:
Newark College of Engineering
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Following an initial section, in which the relation of materialism to positivism (including operationalism) and agnosticism is discussed, and the latter views criticized, a formal definition of dialectical materialism is given. Materialism is contrasted to idealism and dualism. Dialectics is contrasted to metaphysics. Some additional assumptions, usually included in dialectics, such as the interpenetrating character of the levels of science, and rationalism, are listed. In a section devoted to the relation between matter and spirit, the foundations of materialist ethics are laid by stating the humanist axiom of purpose. In the last section, historical materialism is defined, and some reasons for the occasional entanglement of scientific, philosophical, and political controversies are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 1956 , pp. 97 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 1956, The Williams & Wilkins Company

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blokhintzev, D. I., Uspekhi Fisich. Nauk 45 (Oct., 1951).Google Scholar
Bohm, D., Phys. Rev. 85, 166, 180 (1952); 89, 458 (1953); Lectures on Causality (Sao Paulo, unpublished, 1953).10.1103/PhysRev.85.180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgman, P. W., The Logic of Modern Physics (New York, 1927); Reflections of a Physicist (New York, 1950).Google Scholar
Bunge, M., On Levels (unpublished MS., Florida, Argentina, 1954).Google Scholar
Caudwell, C., The Crisis in Physics (London, 1939).Google Scholar
Diderot, D., Le Rêve de d'Alembert (1769, many editions).Google Scholar
Duhem, P., La Theorie Physique: Son Objet, Sa Structure (Paris, 1914).Google Scholar
Dunham, B., Giant in Chains (Boston, 1953).Google Scholar
Einstein, A., Out of My Later Years (New York, 1950).10.1097/00010694-195006000-00011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, F., Ludwig Feurbach und der Ausgang der Klassischen Deutschen Philosophie (Stuttgart, 1888); Herrn Eugen Duehrings Umwaelzung der Wissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1894).Google Scholar
Epstein, P. S., Bull. Atom. Sci., Aug., 1952.Google Scholar
Lamont, C., Humanism as a Philosophy.Google Scholar
Lenin, N., Materialism and Empirio-Criticism (Moscow, 1920).Google Scholar
Lysenko, T. D. et al., The Situation in the Biological Sciences (Moscow, 1949).Google Scholar
Tse-Tung, Mao, On Contradiction (Yenan, 1937; translation from the Chinese published by International Publishers, New York, 1953).Google Scholar
Margenau, H., The Nature of Physical Reality (New York, 1950).Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H., Experience and Prediction (Chicago, 1938).Google Scholar