Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:55:08.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Five Duhemian Theses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

R. M. Yoshida
R. M. Yoshida*
Affiliation:
University of Lethbridge
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In concluding section 2, chapter VI of part II of [6], Duhem claimed:

  1. (I) ... the physicist can never subject an isolated hypothesis to experimental test, but only a whole group of hypotheses ... ([6], p. 187)

  2. (II) ... when the experiment is in disagreement with his predictions, what he learns is that at least one of the hypotheses constituting this group is unacceptable and ought to be modified; but the experiment does not designate which one should be changed'. ([6], p. 187)

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 1975, pp. 29 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adorno, T. W., et al. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1950.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. W. and Trumpler, R. “Testing the Theory of Relativity.” In Source Book in Astronomy, 1900–1950. Edited by Shapley, H. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1960. Pages 351–355.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. The Logical Syntax of Language. New Jersey: Littlefield Adams & Co., 1959.Google Scholar
Copi, I. Introduction to Logic. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1961.Google Scholar
Davisson, C. J. “Are Electrons Waves?” In The World of the Atom. Edited by Boorse, H. A. and Motz, L. Vol. II. New York: Basic Books, 1966. Pages 1144–1165.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. New York: Atheneum, 1962.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. Space, Time and Gravitation. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1920.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement. New York: Dover Publications, 1956.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. “The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity.” In The Principle of Relativity. New York: Dover Publications, 1923.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. “The Falsifiability of a Component of a Theoretical System.” In Mind, Matter and Method. Edited by Feyerabend, P. K. and Maxwell, G. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1966. Pages 273–305.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. The Concept of the Positron. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.10.1063/1.3050673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
Hertz, H. Electric Waves. New York: Dover Publications, 1962.Google Scholar
Jammer, M. The Concepts of Mass. New York: Harper & Row, 1961.Google Scholar
Jammer, M. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
Kaplan, I. Nuclear Physics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. 1963.Google Scholar
Newton, I. Opticks. New York: Dover Publications, 1952.Google Scholar
Newton, I. Principia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Northrup, F. S. C. The Logic of the Sciences and Humanities. Cleveland: The World Publishing Co., 1947.Google Scholar
Perrin, Jean. “Brownian Motion and Molecular Reality.” In The World of the Atom. Edited by Boorse, H. A. and Motz, L. Vol. I. New York: Basic Books, 1966. Pages 628–640.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1961. Pages 20–46.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J. “Moore's Technique.” In Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1957. Pages 149–168.Google Scholar